Comments on: Ice-powered air-conditioner could cut costs
Ice Energy says energy-storage system cuts down on the power required for air conditioning by 30 percent.
Photo: Ice-cold air
Ice Energy says energy-storage system cuts down on the power required for air conditioning by 30 percent.
Photo: Ice-cold air
November 30, 2009 7:42 PM PST
November 30, 2009 6:01 PM PST
November 30, 2009 5:00 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Still, I agree it makes terrific sense from an energy-efficiency and cost savings standpoint.
It helps that a really large amount of water was available. Note that the heat capacity of water is small compared to the heat required in freezing phase change.
My recall is that the cavern where the ice formed was something like a quarter mile long and quite wide and deep. This is not for everone, but it made a huge difference in the mine for a relativly small cost compared to cooling or heating by fuel driven air conditioners.
My thought is making ice in the volume of a small fridge seems to be not enough storage volume. My AC it 3 tons. Three tons of ice is a big block Water liquid is about 62.4 lbs per cubic foot So ten cubic feet (a small fridge) is 624 lbs liquid. After freezing it is less dense and same volume is mow about 56 pounds per cubic foot of ice. That is a quarter of a ton more or less. Three tons of my AC would take twelve of these units. Doesn't seem too workabe to me. My floor won't take that load, but the basement could.
I do my house differntly. At midnight the AC is turned on to cool the entire house to 78 F from the set point for rest of day of 84 F. This uses power at lowest demand time, and the AC does not come on in most summer weather until after noon. I know it is peak power demand time, but it misses the AM ramp up. We also use gas discharge lights that take a quarter or less of the power of hot filament bulbs. And they are off if not needed.
duke
An ice cooler is currently being used in Californina in the Sacramento area and a TOU rate allows the equipment to make ice at night, then chill with it during the daytime. These systems are not currently in production anymore, but obviously the concept has been around a while. It may need some more development to perfect the technology and affordability for residential use.
The difference comes in the fact that it is usually cooler at night and using the heat exchange process to make things cool is more efficient when the ambient temperature is cooler - there is simply less of a thermal difference to overcome.
The ice is a simple thermal battery to allow the cooling process to happen at a time when less electricity is needed to do the same job.
Peak/offpeak charge differences would add to the savings, but the savings are still there without them.
So... some electric companies do offer it to residential companies.
I'm sure that the order of generation for the big companies is soemething like this: full load on Nuke stations, then coal generation, then oil, then peak loads from natural gas turbins. If they are lucky enough to have hydro power, it would be fitted in to maximize income. Pumped storage woud be recharged during off peak and weekends when industial loads are off line.
Some used to have discounts if you were willing to have a remote signal disconect the AC for short periods of peak demand. Idea was to avoid blackouts.
=P
A big ol' block of ice and a fan!
- by dennisrader1945 July 19, 2009 3:10 PM PDT
- We have a newly constructed building in Southern California with Ice Bear units. They are absolutely terrible. Right now it is 88f degrees in our shop and across the hall way it is 92f degrees (they have the setting sun on them right now). It?s unbearable, and we have no business due to the heat. It?s 107f degrees outside right now so why would anyone want to eat in restaurant that is over 90f degrees.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)