Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: Dollhouse CANCELED, What Went Wrong?

Comments on: Intel's chipset road map lacks a driver

An attempt by Intel to improve the performance of basic graphics technology has been stalled by software development delays.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
same article on both pages
by mjm01010101 May 17, 2007 5:23 AM PDT
More fine Cnet reporting/editing.
Reply to this comment
Fixed
by Zoe Slocum May 17, 2007 8:22 AM PDT
Sorry about that. We are working to resolve a technical glitch regarding multipage stories.
this is bad
by inachu May 17, 2007 5:37 AM PDT
once on board video is upgraded then the motherboards will run hotter & hotter.
Reply to this comment
Blame MS
by weegg May 17, 2007 7:56 AM PDT
Their incompetence in defining drivers and interfaces (unless they
copy from already existing standards and then muck it up).
Reply to this comment
And who really gives a crap?
by sqlman2000 May 17, 2007 8:04 AM PDT
Anyone that even mildly cares about graphics performance would buy something with a dedicated graphics card. Another excellent non-story.
Reply to this comment
Another stupid comment!
by anarchyreigns May 17, 2007 9:26 AM PDT
"Anyone that even mildly cares about graphics performance would buy something with a dedicated graphics card."

Wrong. Not in laptops. Integrated graphics in laptops use significantly less battery life than do discrete graphic card.
View reply
perhaps Intel is to blame for duo page mix up!
by xxdd7311 May 17, 2007 8:05 AM PDT
give Cnet a break, every body makes mistake. Overall their reporting is excellent. Kudos to CNET for getting things 99.9 percent right!
Reply to this comment
Blame VISTA
by sal-magnone May 17, 2007 10:20 AM PDT
Blame VISTA. If VISTA hadn't been announced just two weeks before it was released INTEL would have been on time - yeah ...
Reply to this comment
Intel's graphics
by jesmac418 May 17, 2007 11:01 AM PDT
I am really surprised that Intel has dragged their feet on the driver
to enable all the 3D effects. If it is true that Microsoft and Vista are
to blame, it would appear that Vista might have something to do
with the new cheap not working as promised. I personally have
gave up on computer games and going the game console road.
It seems that a ever growing resource hog like Vista requires such a
fast expensive graphics card to play games. It's cheaper just to go
with a dedicated gaming console.
Reply to this comment
Vista and Gaming
by J_Satch May 17, 2007 12:43 PM PDT
If your looking at Vista for a gaming platform, that's your problem. XP is still the OS for PC gaming. There is no compelling reason to use Vista for gaming until DX10 games become available, not to mention decent stable video drivers.

A respectable (not top end) gaming PC running XP is only marginally more expensive that a new console and, of course, is not limited to just gaming.
View all 2 replies
Team up with Nvidia
by nightspark May 17, 2007 2:35 PM PDT
I think that Intel should team up with Nvidia in order to produce a killer integrated GPU. Nvidia shouldn't give them the most advance stuff. Just enough to compete with AMD's integrated chips that are going to be released. If they don't then Intel will lose market share to better integrated graphics chips and thus CPU's, like the article said consumers want great looking games and a low price. Who is the one that can deliver...AMD.
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement