Comments on: Where Dell went wrong
CNET News.com's Michael Kanellos says the company was overthrown by competition, product commoditization and sheer arrogance.
CNET News.com's Michael Kanellos says the company was overthrown by competition, product commoditization and sheer arrogance.
December 29, 2009 8:30 PM PST
December 29, 2009 3:53 PM PST
December 29, 2009 2:50 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Dell is a dull hardware manufacturer. Only two companies have
got the marriage of software and hardware right, Burroughs with
Bob Barton's B5000 and Apple. OK Apple is often seen as being
too hardware centric - but why? Because PC hardware is too
limited and shackled to the design of the IBM PC which was and
still is an uninspiring piece of hardware. Windows too is
shackled to this, but apart from that has problems of its own.
Apple does software as well, which is why it generates
excitement around a competent OS with very good application
software and excellent UI.
Like Bill Gates, Michael Dell seems to resent this and much of his
rationale in business seems to be following his desire to put
Apple out of business - that is not a very good business
strategy. Nor for all those who rubbish Apple in these and
similar comment areas is it a very sensible computing strategy.
Well it's all biting Dell and others back now.
For too long the hardware people have dictated that we buy
machines that they can take a screwdriver to, but now customers
are realising it's the functionality of the software - hence the
popularity of iPod and why OS X is gaining ground.
Mr. Dell can do for Dell what Steve Jobs did for Apple when he
returned. I think that scenario is unlikely for many reasons.
Like most great business successes, luck play a substantial role.
In Dell's case, they were lucky to be in the right place at the right
time. Their enterprise oriented business model came to fruition
about the time of the Windows 95 launch which caused business
to replace all their computers. Then only a few years later, the
ridiculous "Y2K" scare initiated another mass replacement. It's
been all down hill for Dell since then.
Their competitors have matched their prices and copied their
business model. Although there is a steady growth in the PC
sector, individuals and businesses no longer replace computers
every two years like they did in the nineties. And, as another
respondent pointed out, virtually all of Dell's business is PCs
while its competitors can beef up their bottom lines with
products in less cutthroat market segments.
Dell knows all this. Their solution so far has been to resell re-
branded consumer products made by other companies. No
doubt, this strategy came from the same idiot MBAs mentioned
in the article. Implementing this strategy was tacit admission
that the company is incapable of creating its own consumer
products.
That's the rub. They have to diversify their business and become
a consumer electronics company, but they are only good at one
thing: developing and selling IBM PC clones that run third party
software. They haven't a clue on how to develop or market
anything else.
Apple was never taken seriously by enterprise customers. While
it work against them in 1990, their consumer-oriented business
culture and talents is helping transform Apple into a consumer
electronics company.
Maybe Michael Dell can pull it off. I doubt it. But, I'm not buying
any Dell shares.
So now when they need to move beyond the commodity end of the market, they don't have anything to sell, they don't know how to design anything to sell, and so they don't have any customers to sell (to).
Try Ubuntu :-)
sell off the assets and give the money back to the shareholders.
That was just a few years ago. Since then Apples value has risen
approximately 35,000% while Dell's has tanked.
No amount of begging Apple to use their operating system is going
to save Dell.
If only we could do the same thing with operating systems... ! Now, there's a thought!...
"Pride is what the companies want us to feel, when using their products. And to pay them lots of money. Forget that!"
Forget that??? Are you so sure? Just look at Apple - they do it quite succesfully. Apple fanboys are as proud as hell, sure that any innovation can be done only by Steve Jobs personally, and ready to pay Apple lots of money for anything that bears Apple logo or name moniker on it - iMac, iPod, iPhone, iWhatever.
No R&D - The difference between HP and Dell is R&D. Guess which company really spends money on R&D and innovation?
Cust. Service - Saving pennies and loosing $$$ on revenue is a surefire way to go to oblivion. Cust Service from India is a joke if you need anything non-trivial and it irks customers.
Lousy Website and hard to track coupons - i have a home office - that is a small business. Unless I track all the various ad's Dell runs from WSJ to the Parade magazine, how do I know what I am getting....I prefer fair-play. The website has gotten even more complex lately.
I gave up on Dell a long time ago when they got in and out of the laptop business twice. My money and recommendations always go to HP/Compaq/IBM. Dell is no better than a white-box.
One of Dell's statgeies as they climbed the ladder to number one was to leverage "just in time" production of their finished goods. They did this by leveraging their volumes in the direct market with the various OEMs worldwide. They required their suppliers to keep ownership of this intentory until it was placed in Dells hands. Dell only accepted components for products that had already been sold. This reduced Dells risk and inventory carrying cost and allowed them to provide a superior product at roughly the same price. This also allowed Dell to provide higher cost customer service without risking their profitability.
The problem begins with other channels. When the retail space began to squeeze manufactuters and cost them margins without regard for these manufactures health they ultimately forced most of the competion out of the business. When the number of competitors shrinks so to does the incentive to create new and compelling offerings. The focus becomes soley that of providing the price point demanded.
So now we have a shrinking competitive enviroment and increasing cost pressure at a publically traded company and a host of OEM's in Taiwan who are loosing there "Branded" customers as they drop out of the market or shrink their footprint. These same OEM's are now actively courting the only games in town such as Dell.
At some point, a OEM presented a offer that Dell could not say no to and the road to ruin begins. Computers and components from the lowest bidder.
At the company I worked for it was normal business for the purchasing department to be set goals of 3-5% cost reductions per quater on the components used to manufacture for the US Brand players. The reasoning was that the OEM would lose money at first, but gradully with the cost reduction end up profitable. (This is one of the reasons we see so many products start out good and finish as a piece of unreliable junk). In an earlier post I saw mention of Gel capacitors vs Tantalum. This is one of the great examples of cost reduction. I do not know how many meetings I sat in where I watched this cost reduction happen.
So now the product quality starts to suffer from cost pressure and then support costs go up and margins remain the same. Something has to give. Almost every company I have worked for in the tech sector at some point starts to look at Customer Service as a needed evil and not a company value, when this happens it is just a matter of time. You start to see things like "Pay for Service",reduction in hours of operation and ultimately outsourcing. Sound famliliar.
So to sum up what I see as the failure of DEll. When the public demands the unreasonable and the company says OK then the "End Is Near". Instead of setting the trend, defining what is right and growing intelligently Dell has given in and lost the advantage they had as a leader. Look at other industies and we can see this pattern repeated again and again. Dell started out as the Toyota of the PC world and is now heading for the same place as Ford. Lack of long term planning, bowing to the presure of quarterly earnings reports and refusing to think long term.
the place was a insane sweatshop and im sure its no better now.
so please, take a minute to remember the poor souls that are in the machine and keep buying hp/ibm products.
put them out of their misery already.
Love it - great way of putting it :)
Love it - great way of putting it :)
- WHERE DELL WENT WRONG
- by nicki73 February 5, 2007 6:51 PM PST
- I think Dell's Customer Service is where Dell went wrong. I spent 16 hours total on the phone trying to get the right memory and products for my computer. Everytime I called they said my serial number was not on file, they could never find my file. They sold me a lithium battery that was for a laptop, not my PC, sent me the wrong memory cards twice and would not give me credit in the amount of $375.00. I was given the dial-tone many times, talked to so rude that I lost my patience more than once. The worst part is they all told me they were not allowed to help me, they had no authorisation. That I believe! They were coached to not give me a refund and to sell quickly. Dell went wrong for the same reason so many do, POOR CUSTOMER RELATIONS!!!!! I mean lets face-it, with a good attitude anything can happen!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (65 Comments)