Comments on: AMD folds in ATI for graphics future
Newly merged company outlines its plans to deliver a combination PC/graphics processor by 2008 or 2009.
Newly merged company outlines its plans to deliver a combination PC/graphics processor by 2008 or 2009.
January 5, 2010 9:54 AM PST
January 5, 2010 8:53 AM PST
January 5, 2010 8:11 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Never have had problems return using Intel/Nvidia chips for the past several years.
If you don't know how to install and/or debug drivers then again take it to someone that does.
All of us that have had positive experiences with AMD and ATI feel for you and if you ever find yourself with a technical problem that is over your head (ie; installing a heat sink/fan, ensuring case temperature not to high) please feel free to post so that someone can help you.
If you don't know how to install and/or debug drivers then again take it to someone that does.
All of us that have had positive experiences with AMD and ATI feel for you and if you ever find yourself with a technical problem that is over your head (ie; installing a heat sink/fan, ensuring case temperature not to high) please feel free to post so that someone can help you.
PS - Luck has nothing to do with it.
I myself have been using AMD products since the AMD K6 and have not seen a problem. These processors included the K6-266 (Socket 7), Athlon 750 (Slot A), Athlon 1.33GHz and 1.4GHz (Socket A), and Athlon64 3200+ (Socket 754).
By the way - you do realize that many Pentium 4 CPUs have been known to run very hot, right?
I can't say I've ever used an AMD processor before, and since my Mac uses an Intel Core 2 Duo, I don't think I will anytime soon.
They will also FINALLY give AMD some good reference platforms for Standardized Business Systems (where the system image can't change due to hardware changes for a life of 6 to 12 months).
I look for good things to come of this relationship especially in the laptop and mobile devices area for both of them.
Good fortune to both companies.
- So what?
- by Rimer June 20, 2007 9:01 AM PDT
- I cannot honestly say I have ever used AMD, but from the lineups I have seen the only one that excites me is Intel because as it stands they are a step ahead of AMD. To me the company it comes from matters little, what matters is the quality of the product, and whats best at the time of purchase.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)As far as ATI goes, I won't be moving to an ATI unless they end up producing something amazing, but from what I have seen nVidia pump out it seems highly doubtful that I will ever buy a ATI.
So back to my original question, So what? Does it really matter that the two merged and I honestly don't understand peoples loyalties to either company, why sell your soul to corporation when you should be keeping it to yourself, would you buy a lesser product at the same price or slightly less just because another company you dislike has a better product at the same price or a little more? Disliking them is no reason to not buy a better product for the same money. Its like not liking windows and still buying windows, just because you don't like it doesn't mean you don't buy it.
So stop the 'choose a side' crap already, it makes reading these news reports a pain in the ass because half the comments are people glorifying one or another company as the end all of products, in 20 years we will probably not even remember some of these companies and be laughing about how vintage all this stuff is anyways.