Comments on: AMD's man of the future

newsmaker CTO Phil Hester's chip design strategy spans supporting co-processors and helping the developing world.

[sexlove2046]

dual-core

i like dual-core pc

[NRecob]

My Opeteron ROCKS

I love my Opteron 175-it leaves my old Intel P4 2.6HT in the DUST.

[sexlove2046]

dual-core

i like dual-core pc

[NRecob]

My Opeteron ROCKS

I love my Opteron 175-it leaves my old Intel P4 2.6HT in the DUST.

[baswwe]

AMD RULEZ

dual core quad core sex core

you name it they are the best

[baswwe]

AMD RULEZ

dual core quad core sex core

you name it they are the best

[NRecob]

INTEL=REAR VIEW MIRROR/ OPTERON=RULES

AMD IS KICKING INTEL'S A$$. NOBODY BUT N00BIES BUY INTEL ANYMORE.

OPTERON RULES!

[NRecob]

INTEL=REAR VIEW MIRROR/ OPTERON=RULES

AMD IS KICKING INTEL'S A$$. NOBODY BUT N00BIES BUY INTEL ANYMORE.

OPTERON RULES!

[Blito]

Stealing chips?

"You also have to deal with the protection of components. When you first get a lot of these devices, someone other than you is on the hook for the liability of the cost. You are in there, you pay for it over time, right, but there is a phenomena that can happen like stripping cars. If somebody steals it, tries to take the components out and sell the components as individual piece parts, for some period of time, there is a higher value in trying to do that than in protecting the device. So you need to think about how you protect the components of these systems to do as much as possible to prevent that sort of thing from happening."

I understand if they are selling it AMD should take a share of the profits but taking the chips out is another matter that isn't stealing other then breaking the AMD warrenty. They shouldn't create a total Orwellian Thin Client scenrio totally either; although it would be good in allot of other minor ways.

If AMD is going open source the specs on it's co-processors that could be a good thing for them against Intel.

[Blito]

Stealing chips?

"You also have to deal with the protection of components. When you first get a lot of these devices, someone other than you is on the hook for the liability of the cost. You are in there, you pay for it over time, right, but there is a phenomena that can happen like stripping cars. If somebody steals it, tries to take the components out and sell the components as individual piece parts, for some period of time, there is a higher value in trying to do that than in protecting the device. So you need to think about how you protect the components of these systems to do as much as possible to prevent that sort of thing from happening."

I understand if they are selling it AMD should take a share of the profits but taking the chips out is another matter that isn't stealing other then breaking the AMD warrenty. They shouldn't create a total Orwellian Thin Client scenrio totally either; although it would be good in allot of other minor ways.

If AMD is going open source the specs on it's co-processors that could be a good thing for them against Intel.

[ilover2]

Conroe is gonna getch ya

watch out slow mo

[ilover2]

Conroe is gonna getch ya

watch out slow mo