Comments on: Intel makes performance claims, AMD rebuffs them
Intel's prediction of a 20-percent lead in chip performance over AMD isn't sitting well with the smaller chipmaker.
Intel's prediction of a 20-percent lead in chip performance over AMD isn't sitting well with the smaller chipmaker.
November 29, 2009 5:54 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:10 PM PST
November 29, 2009 4:09 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
And they'd better pray Cell/Niagare/et al-type processors never make it to desktops, or they're history......
Obviously there would be plenty of things that would need to happen to make this a reality - in terms of both hardware and software, but it would make sense for Microsoft to move in that direction.
A desktop powered by Cell processors would blow away any of the current technologies, as well as those about to be released in the fall.
This sort of development could be the sort of catalyst we haven't seen in the industry since the first home computers appeared on the market back in the 80s.
Most of the revolutionary systems designed back then were doomed due to their owning companies lack of vision, as well as Microsoft and Intel's marketing strategy, which it must be said was truly brilliant - how else could you explain how a computer with a cpm based, single tasking OS being chosen ahead of multitasking, multithread OS powered computers with multiprocessor chipsets, stereo sound (unhead of) and 12-bit graphics (also unheard of)?
And they'd better pray Cell/Niagare/et al-type processors never make it to desktops, or they're history......
Obviously there would be plenty of things that would need to happen to make this a reality - in terms of both hardware and software, but it would make sense for Microsoft to move in that direction.
A desktop powered by Cell processors would blow away any of the current technologies, as well as those about to be released in the fall.
This sort of development could be the sort of catalyst we haven't seen in the industry since the first home computers appeared on the market back in the 80s.
Most of the revolutionary systems designed back then were doomed due to their owning companies lack of vision, as well as Microsoft and Intel's marketing strategy, which it must be said was truly brilliant - how else could you explain how a computer with a cpm based, single tasking OS being chosen ahead of multitasking, multithread OS powered computers with multiprocessor chipsets, stereo sound (unhead of) and 12-bit graphics (also unheard of)?
a quad core and that Intel will prob be close to rolling out their
second gen of dual core mobiles when AMD is just starting to roll
out their first gen. Fanboys on both sides are pathetic. Esp the AM
fanboys who are now running scared that maybe. Just maybe Intel
finally has something that can best AMD?s desktop and mobile
wares. FUD rules in the realm of AMD vs. Intel.
a quad core and that Intel will prob be close to rolling out their
second gen of dual core mobiles when AMD is just starting to roll
out their first gen. Fanboys on both sides are pathetic. Esp the AM
fanboys who are now running scared that maybe. Just maybe Intel
finally has something that can best AMD?s desktop and mobile
wares. FUD rules in the realm of AMD vs. Intel.
and turning to the Banias concept pushed by Mooly,
and developed in Haifa, Israel. Slowly but surely,
US loosing it's technoly lead. Instead of in investing in fuel hungry SUV's you should return
to investing in education.
Totally agree with the SUV bash, though.
Far too many important engineering decisions are made by people not qualified to do so in these large companies. That's the real problem here (or at least one of them).
I think it's great that Intel's next-generation cores are coming from Israel. But that doesn't mean that Americans suddenly can't design microprocessors -- just that Americans aren't the only ones who can design microprocessors. Which shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
and turning to the Banias concept pushed by Mooly,
and developed in Haifa, Israel. Slowly but surely,
US loosing it's technoly lead. Instead of in investing in fuel hungry SUV's you should return
to investing in education.
Totally agree with the SUV bash, though.
Far too many important engineering decisions are made by people not qualified to do so in these large companies. That's the real problem here (or at least one of them).
I think it's great that Intel's next-generation cores are coming from Israel. But that doesn't mean that Americans suddenly can't design microprocessors -- just that Americans aren't the only ones who can design microprocessors. Which shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
Processor performance isn't nearly as important as it was 5 years ago, and these companies don't want to fall out public's eye. Bleeding edge components only matter ro a select few - the rest of us don't care, we only want cheap reliable PC's.
- Pathetic?
- by February 28, 2006 7:01 AM PST
- Pathetic is believing what these companies press departments are spouting in an effort to save face.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- embrace change
- by Seaspray0 February 28, 2006 8:14 AM PST
- When they first are released, they are expensive, aren't they? But without the research these companies do, that price would never go down. You would never get your cheap PC without that.
- Like this
-
(26 Comments)Processor performance isn't nearly as important as it was 5 years ago, and these companies don't want to fall out public's eye. Bleeding edge components only matter ro a select few - the rest of us don't care, we only want cheap reliable PC's.