Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon

Comments on: Microsoft limits Longhorn's Itanium job duties

Redmond's move reinforces the chip's position as a component mainly meant for powerful multiprocessor servers.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
I've got a hunch...
by Earl Benser September 2, 2005 2:20 PM PDT
... that Linux or Unix will have no trouble utilizing the Itanium
processor for any number of tasks beyond MS's case of myopia.
Sort of looks like MS is trying to slip the shaft to Intel. Maybe it's
time for Intel to come out with a new OS and apps for the Pentium
line... or is that Linux too?
Reply to this comment
I've got a hunch...
by Earl Benser September 2, 2005 2:20 PM PDT
... that Linux or Unix will have no trouble utilizing the Itanium
processor for any number of tasks beyond MS's case of myopia.
Sort of looks like MS is trying to slip the shaft to Intel. Maybe it's
time for Intel to come out with a new OS and apps for the Pentium
line... or is that Linux too?
Reply to this comment
I've got a hunch...
by Earl Benser September 2, 2005 2:20 PM PDT
... that Linux or Unix will have no trouble utilizing the Itanium
processor for any number of tasks beyond MS's case of myopia.
Sort of looks like MS is trying to slip the shaft to Intel. Maybe it's
time for Intel to come out with a new OS and apps for the Pentium
line... or is that Linux too?
Reply to this comment
So what's new?
by September 2, 2005 11:44 PM PDT
Windows Server 2003 for Itanium is also pretty limited. The Itanium 2 is an awesome chip, but way too expensive. You could setup a nice load balanced cluster using x86/EM64T CPU's for the same money.
Reply to this comment
So what's new?
by September 2, 2005 11:44 PM PDT
Windows Server 2003 for Itanium is also pretty limited. The Itanium 2 is an awesome chip, but way too expensive. You could setup a nice load balanced cluster using x86/EM64T CPU's for the same money.
Reply to this comment
So what's new?
by September 2, 2005 11:44 PM PDT
Windows Server 2003 for Itanium is also pretty limited. The Itanium 2 is an awesome chip, but way too expensive. You could setup a nice load balanced cluster using x86/EM64T CPU's for the same money.
Reply to this comment
Linux on ia64
by September 3, 2005 3:01 AM PDT
The article specifically mentioned SLES and RHEL as Linux alternatives for for Itanium, and those are both good (but expensive) products.

If you want a free (enterprise level) alternative to those, give CentOS a try < http://www.centos.org >

Debian and Gentoo also have ia64 ports.
Reply to this comment
The point is...
by Johnny Mnemonic September 3, 2005 11:45 PM PDT
Linux is extremlely well supported on the Itanium.
View reply
Linux on ia64
by September 3, 2005 3:01 AM PDT
The article specifically mentioned SLES and RHEL as Linux alternatives for for Itanium, and those are both good (but expensive) products.

If you want a free (enterprise level) alternative to those, give CentOS a try < http://www.centos.org >

Debian and Gentoo also have ia64 ports.
Reply to this comment
The point is...
by Johnny Mnemonic September 3, 2005 11:45 PM PDT
Linux is extremlely well supported on the Itanium.
View reply
Linux on ia64
by September 3, 2005 3:01 AM PDT
The article specifically mentioned SLES and RHEL as Linux alternatives for for Itanium, and those are both good (but expensive) products.

If you want a free (enterprise level) alternative to those, give CentOS a try < http://www.centos.org >

Debian and Gentoo also have ia64 ports.
Reply to this comment
The point is...
by Johnny Mnemonic September 3, 2005 11:45 PM PDT
Linux is extremlely well supported on the Itanium.
View reply
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement