Version: 2008
  • On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!

Comments on: Samsung develops flash-based disk

Disks will have a capacity of up to 16GB; first disks will target sub-notebooks and tablet PCs.
Photo: Samsung's solid-state disk

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
the article neglected to mention
by mortis9 May 23, 2005 3:23 PM PDT
they referred to the ipod. One great thing about flash is its duribility. flash can take a fall far better than a hard drive. you can bet my next ipod will be sporting one of those.
Reply to this comment
the article neglected to mention
by mortis9 May 23, 2005 3:23 PM PDT
they referred to the ipod. One great thing about flash is its duribility. flash can take a fall far better than a hard drive. you can bet my next ipod will be sporting one of those.
Reply to this comment
Why even call it a flash "disk"
by wazzledoozle May 23, 2005 4:41 PM PDT
Thats misleading in teh way that it could hurt sales. They should call it hard flash or something, other than disk.
Reply to this comment
Why even call it a flash "disk"
by wazzledoozle May 23, 2005 4:41 PM PDT
Thats misleading in teh way that it could hurt sales. They should call it hard flash or something, other than disk.
Reply to this comment
Why Not Use Both?
by Stating May 23, 2005 6:22 PM PDT
Seems to me that until they can offer larger Flash disk capacities at competetive price points, they should consider using both technologies side by side. Put the little used but hoggish data like Windows recovery, printer drivers, fonts, hibernate files, etc. on the hard drive and frequently used, volatile data on Flash. I've got 6 gigabytes worth of Windows crud on c:\, most of which is used infrequently. This doesn't have to be an either/or engineering decision.


Keith
www.techcando.com
Reply to this comment
Why not use both indeed!
by Mendz May 23, 2005 7:11 PM PDT
Microsoft's future Windows versions plan to support flash-based storage media to perform memory swapping and similar/related processes as you mentioned. Yes, I believe there are plans to use both harddisk and flash memory side-by-side. Of course, this will depend on hardware manufacturers who'll create boards with built-in flash memory. I think negotiations are on-going.
View reply
Why Not Use Both?
by Stating May 23, 2005 6:22 PM PDT
Seems to me that until they can offer larger Flash disk capacities at competetive price points, they should consider using both technologies side by side. Put the little used but hoggish data like Windows recovery, printer drivers, fonts, hibernate files, etc. on the hard drive and frequently used, volatile data on Flash. I've got 6 gigabytes worth of Windows crud on c:\, most of which is used infrequently. This doesn't have to be an either/or engineering decision.


Keith
www.techcando.com
Reply to this comment
Why not use both indeed!
by Mendz May 23, 2005 7:11 PM PDT
Microsoft's future Windows versions plan to support flash-based storage media to perform memory swapping and similar/related processes as you mentioned. Yes, I believe there are plans to use both harddisk and flash memory side-by-side. Of course, this will depend on hardware manufacturers who'll create boards with built-in flash memory. I think negotiations are on-going.
View reply
Well, Finally !!!
by May 23, 2005 8:41 PM PDT
Been waiting for this for a LONG time. I know they suggested this was for PC's. But I've been thinking about my iPod battery with finite recharges & only about 10 hours play time. Go to solid state & no HD to spin up each time AND have a week or two's play time.

The article said "The disks will read data at 57MB per second (megabytes per second) and write at 32MB per second, according to Samsung.".

Q. Does anyone know whether this is fast enough write speed, to be usable for DVR ?

I have often wondered - we already have picture iPods, and so.....is the video iPod (AKA a DVR machine replacement) far behind, once the capacity & write speed is conquered.

Can you imagine the $ value to Apple if they could get a video iPod on the market first - $$$$$$$$$.
Reply to this comment
Well, Finally !!!
by May 23, 2005 8:41 PM PDT
Been waiting for this for a LONG time. I know they suggested this was for PC's. But I've been thinking about my iPod battery with finite recharges & only about 10 hours play time. Go to solid state & no HD to spin up each time AND have a week or two's play time.

The article said "The disks will read data at 57MB per second (megabytes per second) and write at 32MB per second, according to Samsung.".

Q. Does anyone know whether this is fast enough write speed, to be usable for DVR ?

I have often wondered - we already have picture iPods, and so.....is the video iPod (AKA a DVR machine replacement) far behind, once the capacity & write speed is conquered.

Can you imagine the $ value to Apple if they could get a video iPod on the market first - $$$$$$$$$.
Reply to this comment
Flash is Unreliable, has asymetric slow write
by grey_eminence May 25, 2005 12:22 PM PDT
I cant even believe what I'm reading. In my many years of using all kinds of memory. Flash is the most unreliable and slow memory around.

Flash cost compared to cheap hard drives isnt worthy of discussion.

Solid State Drives will Cost over $ 25.00 a Gigabyte verus the Hard Drive < $ .50 a Gigabyte versus Blu-Ray / HD-DVD $ .012 versus Dvd-R $ .08 versus Inphase Worm Holographic $ .50 versus Atomic Holographic Drive < $ 0.0004 a Gigabyte.

Flash makes great rom configuration boot device but as main program storage is not well suited.
Reply to this comment
Flash is Unreliable, has asymetric slow write
by grey_eminence May 25, 2005 12:22 PM PDT
I cant even believe what I'm reading. In my many years of using all kinds of memory. Flash is the most unreliable and slow memory around.

Flash cost compared to cheap hard drives isnt worthy of discussion.

Solid State Drives will Cost over $ 25.00 a Gigabyte verus the Hard Drive < $ .50 a Gigabyte versus Blu-Ray / HD-DVD $ .012 versus Dvd-R $ .08 versus Inphase Worm Holographic $ .50 versus Atomic Holographic Drive < $ 0.0004 a Gigabyte.

Flash makes great rom configuration boot device but as main program storage is not well suited.
Reply to this comment
good point
by October 11, 2005 3:03 AM PDT
I always believe that the OS should be on a super fast BIOS type chip, were the OS most frequent use files or the core of the OS with an integrated ultra fast dedicated channel to the the memory and CPU. Then have a 10GB solid state disk like samsung for the rest of the OS. Have a 250Gb drive for your programs and personal documents (pictures, documents)
Reply to this comment
good point
by October 11, 2005 3:03 AM PDT
I always believe that the OS should be on a super fast BIOS type chip, were the OS most frequent use files or the core of the OS with an integrated ultra fast dedicated channel to the the memory and CPU. Then have a 10GB solid state disk like samsung for the rest of the OS. Have a 250Gb drive for your programs and personal documents (pictures, documents)
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement