Comments on: Dell exec: We're not Wintel's lapdog
Kevin Kettler says Dell plays a starring role in guiding tech, even if that causes friction with allies.
Kevin Kettler says Dell plays a starring role in guiding tech, even if that causes friction with allies.
January 5, 2010 6:00 PM PST
January 5, 2010 5:27 PM PST
January 5, 2010 5:24 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
They are inventing s**t.
http://sharikou.blogspot.com/
How many of you remember the 5150? I remember I gave my uncle advise on new CPU's. He was more OSX knowlewdgeble than windows he was then using my dual usb ibook, to make a long story short withing one year he had to get it fixed 4 different times one week after the one year warranty the motherboard burned out of course Dell would not replace it although it was a wide known problem He spend 500.00 for parts and labor PLUS the 1200 he spend on the 5150 that is a macbook pro. Lets just say he learned his lesson. FYI he now just bought a macbook pro
computer standards area of anything. What has Dell done that
hasn't already been done by IBM or Apple? Apple is the true
pioneer in the computer industry and Dell is only big because they
can sell plastic computers at low prices and most of the world uses
Windows. Their machines are only as good as the OS they come
with - and they'll never run OS X.
;) I created the X86 64 bit extension. ;)
examples given do not represent a "complete"
break with Wintel ranks to "fully" support GNU/Linux (even on servers), IBM technologis including DB2 or any other technology that competes "fiercely" with Wintel to the degree that bespeaks "independance".
Uninformed readers will not be able to see this
reality in their comments.
Why do people buy Dell's anyway? They're no better than Compaq and look where they are now...
First of all, I would NOT p##s off Lord Darth Gates & his Microsith Empire, Dell.
Second, Intel has many customers, including Apple now, so they can take you or leave you.
Open Source Unix/Linux/Lindows/Red Hat/Yellow Dog/Mac OSX Unix on MacINTELS do not need you Dell.
With a press statement like this one, you may have just signed your death warrant.
RIP DELL
can come up with. Odds are that a sampling of Dell assemblies
for any given Dell model will reveal little parts control - you are
like to find anything as long as gross specs are met. Some of
that is unavoidable, suppliers change on you routinely. But, Dell
doesn't really care - it just slaps together whatever seems to
work.
And that makes them lapdog to no one. They don't care who
their suppliers are, as long as there is enough of them, and the
prices are low enough.
And as long as the public thinks Dell and PC are synonymous,
Dell will sell computers. And thanks to MS's arm twisting, Dell
has no choice but to include the price of a copy of Windows with
each computer, whether or not Windows is actually installed.
Now that is what stinks in the deal.
gives massive discounts to the big customers like Dell and now
Apple if either of them started selling AMD it is probably known
that it may make Intel not wanna give out the good deals, much
like when a couple of vendors were talking of not shipping
windows with their machines, MS did not like the idea.
as for inovation, yeah right, Intel has even said that the biggest
thing holding back the industry is "a few largest companies in
the business"
Intel wanted USB for keyboards, mice and most other peripherals
in 1997, wanted to kill the floppy drive around that time, more
recently to kill BIOS in favor of EFI, make wireless standard in all
PCs and a whole bunch of other stuff that still has not happened
due mostly in part because Dell and a couple others AND MS is a
big part of that problem as well when it comes to emerging
technologies, they don't seem to beable to write a decent driver
until the technology is old news and the industry is moving on to
the next standard.
Dell is a garbage PC and notebook maker.
He got B.S. in electrical engineering at Lehigh University and masters and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.
He presently is an adjunct professor of electrical engineering at the University of Texas. He's also on the engineering advisory councils at the UT College of Electrical and Computer Engineering and CMU's Carnegie Institute of Technology.
- People really want cheap computers, not offer AMD from Dell
- by Thinkforachange April 12, 2006 8:31 PM PDT
- when it comes down to it... what Dell hears from their customers.. isnt that they want a particular technology... its getting basic technology at a unbeatable price. say all u want about wanting a AMD cpu in a computer, u wont buy it unless there is a great price on it, RIGHT?.. i'm pretty sure u will agree.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Then they chose the right company...
- by fred dunn April 13, 2006 7:38 AM PDT
- Because aside from the CPUs the components in their systems are "low bid" stuff that I wouldn't recommend.
- Like this
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (76 Comments)at this point, AMD doesnt have the ability to even produce enough of these Cpus anyway for Dell and certainly the price wont be cheap. So why would Dell accept AMD cpus at the risk or losing advertising budgeting from Intel and high volume discounts just to barely sell a few AMD cpus which account for only 20% of the market at full capacity.
their computer prices will shoot up 1%+ definitely and with how the market is, 1% is damn borderline profit or loss.
But you are absolutely right 90% of the people are looking strictly at price. That is why Intel computers are a commodity now. They all use the same chipset/CPU/memory. So it doesn't matter who you buy it from. Dell just has a name in the market that used to stand for quality and support, "USED TO".