Comments on: Attackers exploit zero-day Windows flaw
Attackers take advantage of vulnerability in Windows animated cursor. Also: Trojan spam dupes users into thinking it's an IE 7 beta.
Attackers take advantage of vulnerability in Windows animated cursor. Also: Trojan spam dupes users into thinking it's an IE 7 beta.
January 6, 2010 9:58 PM PST
January 6, 2010 9:25 PM PST
January 6, 2010 6:30 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
/P
but Microsoft has come a long way in improving Vista. Not to
mention it comes bundled with more security appz, dedicated in
solving this neverending WINDOW's PROBLEM.
I also believe they should admit defeat and adopt a more stable
kernel like the Mach Unix kernel which Apple has adapted for OS
X. NT is kind of showing its age and I can't believe their using
NT AGAIN in Vista and calling it revolutionary. They have this
beautiful OS X like interface running over an 11 year old kernel
which time and again has proven to be less useful as the years
go by.
Sadly though its all in vain, as this will probably take them even
longer to impliment now, more than ever, as they are
entrenched in supporting all the PC vendors, developers &
consumers they've managed to accumulate over these years, still
supporting NT.
In the long run, Apple will probably do another leap frog again
making it even more harder for Microsoft to catch up.
Aww maybe not that long, say another 5 years, maybe?
NT is getting long in the tooth, but much of it was rewritten for Vista, particularly for security purposes. It is a viable OS and there is no reason to dump it. Apple dumped its old OS because it had no choice. It was falling behind in what it could do compared to Windows. Apple tried to fix it but gave up and brought Jobs back along with his NeXT Unix-based OS. Does it lack the vulnerabilities of Windows? Again, no it doesn?t. Jobs would be the last to claim that it does.
Mac users still benefit from its low marketing share in that it offers comparatively little prospect for profit to hackers. That profit aspect is what drives hacking now. Bedroom hackers seeing how much mischievous damage they can wreak is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. We now have criminal gangs doing the hacking to steal personal information to allow access to credit card and banking information. Since 90% of the world-wide computer market belongs to Windows, it is Windows that the hackers go after.
There is not a security researcher out there who believes the nonsense that the Mac OS is a better OS and therefore less vulnerable to hacking. Anything and everything out there can be and is being hacked, OSes, applications, browsers (including Safari). You have only to note the numerous security patches Apple has released recently to see the reality.
FWIW
Joe Shmoe, and I've said this so many times, doesn't care about security enough to know NOT to click a link unless they're educated enough to know better.
My mother used to just click on anything before I started talking to her about what she could get herself into. Now she's a bit more careful. My niece used to want to click anything that looked 'cute' but doesn't anymore - she just turns off the computer if she doesn't like what pops up on her screen.
I'm quite sure the more tech savvy people have seen the kind of careless behavior I'm talking about in just about anyone they know or work with.
The fact of the matter is that it takes just a simple intuitive engineering attack to make people click a link that ultimate leads to a compromised machine.
It doesn't have to be fully automated nowadays. That definition ended a couple years ago.
_could_ be spreading rapidly?
can't you get verification of weather its spreading rapidly or not?
or wait until it is spreading rapidly before writing a story about it?
this is lamer than lame.........
people can't be bothered with _could_ be stories... especially when security is concerned.
have a nice day muckasoft users and losers. Mu ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
- Nice One hackers... (* ROFLOL *)
- by wbenton April 4, 2007 7:15 AM PDT
- Microsoft MUST verify whether the threat is real or not. They don't move until there is an iminent threat already occuring in at least several places.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(25 Comments)What better way to get Microsoft to openly acknowledge such than place the code on the internet for others to exploit so that they can exploit Microsoft's lack of desire to FIX the problem.
(* CHUCKLE *)
A few more instances like this and Microsoft may just eat out of their hands... (* ROFLOL *)
Don't ya just luv it when a plan comes together? (* ROFLOL *)
FWIW