Comments on: Symantec updates Norton products

New 2007 editions of products promise improved protection and better use of computing resources.

[gmycyk191]

2 little 2 late

Symantec's desktop products have been all but considered legacy since 2002, even though they change the date every year.

They've lost touch with the consumer a very long time ago. Sure, its possible they can make a come back, but then again, so can Dell... HA!

[Bad Tom]

AGREE!

This new version HAS to be an improvement over what they have now! Left them several years ago, even though I had 6 months left on my subscription. The software was so BUGGY and the support (If you can call it that) was totally nonexistent! They will NEVER get another dollar from this guy!

[lolio]

Bloatware

Don't waste your time or your money Symantec is garbage bloat/software.

[kriskl]

I agree!

I'm really suprised they still in business! SOftware is so bad! I removed it from all friends PCs, and recommended FREE afternative,

Why CNET is wasting time even talking about Norton????

[kriskl]

I agree

I'm really suprised they still in business! SOftware is so bad! I removed it from all friends PCs, and recommended FREE afternative,

Why CNET is wasting time even talking about Norton????

[gmycyk191]

Bloatware is only part of it

Huge drain on resources (big overhead), absolutely. But I think worse is the fact that its software simply fails to protect your PC from all the online nasties out there today. Then, try and un-install it - imposable. Its own software removal tools are one of the most popular downloads.

Symantec is another "big guy" corporation, motivated solely by increasing its own stock prices, etc. They?ve turned into Microsoft ? fat, old, bald, wealthy and complacent. Winfax has been abandoned like an unwanted step child, Norton Utilities has had little change since before Windows XP in 2001, and with services like Goto MYPC, and XP?s built in RDP, PcAnywhere is practically obsolete.

I fondly remember the Norton software of the late 90?s; that was good stuff back then. Too bad. I haven?t recommended one of their products since Clinton was president. Now Bill, what did you really do with dress? Never mind, I don?t want to know.

[ebeamsales]

Has anyone ever wondered...?

Now I am not a conspiracy theorist, but I can't help but wonder if it is Symantec and the other Anti-virus companies who actually create a lot of the viruses their software claims to defend. How else can they justify constant updates and "new" versions of their software? Are there really that many intelligent losers out there who have nothing better to do that to create a virus solely designed to wreck havoc? Yes, there are some ligitimate threats out there, but I can't help but wonder what motivates these Antivirus companies. By the way, as a Comcast high-speed internet customer, I get McAffee for free. I had been using Norton Utilities for several years. No more.

Has anyone ever wondered...??

Virus makers = Programmers = Intellectuals = anarchists?

Some ones is making a profit.

[robert1275]

better late than never

I see several advantages in this offer. For one thing the price for the internet security package is for up to 3 PCs and users will be offered a free software upgrade to make the software compatible for Vista when it launches. Norton 360 however, is too far behind. Can Symantec play catchup after so many years of being number 1?

[Aaron1710]

They've already lost my clients

I've railed against Norton for years now with my clients, having them pull it off their systems for all the problems they now claim they have addressed.

I'm sorry, Symantec, but it has taken you so long that it will take a while to again trust your software.

It is, in many ways, too little, too late.

[maxmillius]

Take processing to anohter appliance

I wish more would be done with creating an appliance to do the antivirus-IPS-IDS work and simply load a light client to the user stations.

This is the whole client server idea but use one stand alone box to protect you whole home network......

This is not a unique idea.

We will all be there in a few years....but why wait...they need to cut the time and head there now.

This is more efficent and would be cost effective for the home user to pay $ 70.00 a year for your whole network versus per machine pricing......

Get with it Symantec......or pay the price.

[wbenton]

Way too late in the game...

While they were forced on end-users as an integrated part of Microsoft's OS pre-installed Anti-Virus package... they had a hit regardless of how bad it's performance was.

Now that the MS relationship is off... they're finally coming to their senses... but only after the Microsoft Novacaine wore off!!!

Bottom Line: Microsoft assists in staving off development of better products... just like with their own OS's...

When you don't have to worry about rivals... you tend to slack off in the performance department.

Walt