Comments on: Slew of Windows patches coming
Microsoft plans to release eight security alerts with fixes for Windows flaws--and at least one hole could be used for a worm attack.
Microsoft plans to release eight security alerts with fixes for Windows flaws--and at least one hole could be used for a worm attack.
January 4, 2010 5:58 AM PST
January 4, 2010 5:56 AM PST
January 4, 2010 4:00 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
-- oh wait. I have a Mac? Never mind.
Certain things about PC's suck, certain things about Mac's suck, so shut the hell up already.... jeez
- RE: Bias
- by wrwjpn October 8, 2005 10:57 PM PDT
- Let me answer you then.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- You missed most of my points
- by Andrew J Glina October 10, 2005 5:58 AM PDT
- 1. It is silly to compare Tiger to Win2K as Win2K is five years old. You should be comparing OS 9 to Win2K.
- Like this View reply
Processing -
(18 Comments)"Four is believable. I last installed a Win2K system a few weeks ago and I think it would been about that. My objection is that you mentioned three and then said "etc", implying that there are at least two more to come. Hence my exaggerating line. I apologise for mis-interpreting your usage of "etc"."
Apology accepted.
"Comparing Win2K to OSX is silly and you know it. When Win2K was released the Mac world run on OS9. The fact that there are still proud Win2K users demonstrates that it is not that bad an OS. There should be many updates for Win2K as it is an old OS.
Well there are still many proud users out there using OS9. Using your reasoning then it is possible to compare. Why is it silly? How can you make a statement as fact when you haven't used OS 9?
"It does not always make sense to dowload all updates, and thus a full roll-up is not always a good idea. For example, for servers I do not care about Outlook Express."
Yes but why would Outlook Express show up as an update for a server? Why do MS servers have a web browser installed in them in the first place? Yeah, I am going to be surfing the 'net with my server. Yes there are things that I would never install if I had the choice, but I don't have a choice if I am stuck using W2K server do I?
"As for problems in service packs, that is not a Microsoft only problem either. Apple did the same just recently."
Yes and that is why we don't rush on installing updates right away like they recommend. I had never stated that Apple doesn't screw up. But whose record shows more mishaps?
"Yes, the last time I used the Mac was with System 7. I have not seen one reason to go back. Feel free to say that I lack the knowledge to say otherwise. I have to get over it. I cannot use everything in the world just to say "I now know". (If I felt that way I would be out looking for cocaine right now!)"
How do you know that cocaine is bad? Did you read that in a book published by cocaine users? Most like likely not. How do you make your assumptions about other OSes? By reading publications form the developers or only the pubs by MS developers. I will make an educated guess on this one.
Then by the same reasoning Morphine is bad. Tell take to cancer patients. I should not ever have an X-ray as well then. Everything has it purposes and you should take that into consideration and gain the knowledge before making statements.
2. I said a server, not Windows 2000 Server. I still use the plain Win2K.
3. I know Cocaine is bad as I have known a lot of drug users in the past. Some have died. (I used to do a lot of theatre.) Thus, my interest to try it myself is low. (Cocaine is not Morphine.)
4. I learn about OSes that I do not use regularly by reading news stories (CNET loves Apple), by going to the company sites, and by reading comments from people like you.
5. Once again, my statement was simply that Macs do have patches. That was it. There really is no need to use a Mac to know that.