Comments on: Major graphics flaw threatens Windows PCs

Security flaw involving JPEG files affects at least a dozen Microsoft software applications and operating systems.

Once again, just install SP2....

And you won't need to worry about it.

[Fray9]

How convenient...

How convenient for Microsoft that this flaw was suddenly just now "discovered" and that SP2 fixes it.

Its just my personal opinion but I find that the more a company wants me to upgrade when I dont need to the less I want to. At this point SP2 is starting to feel more and more like a gun to the head.

[wrwjpn]

But

This is fine if you have XP but not any of the previous versions.
Duh!

dude, you must be paid by MS

Are you paid by MS my friend?, I think they have an entire staff just to post not so clever comments with each Cnet news that shows how bad MS products are... (and there must be hundreds of people in that team :) ).

I can't imagine a respectable IT professional just saying "yes the software was made very badly, but don't worry, as long as you install a buggy patch when MS decides to create it its OK".

MS patches come veeeeeryyyyy slllllloooooowwwwww, the only reason for that is that the code is so complex that you have to patch on top of other patches..... So even if you configure to patch every 5 minutes, you will still be vurnerable for a month until MS finally ends up with the superpatch.

Greetings from Mexico

[iKenny]

Once again, just ditch Windows

If I were in this situation, I wouldn't put up with it for another
minute.

You just don't get it, do you?

Windows isn't the problem, it's the people who spend all their time trying to figure out ways to exploit the system.

But hey, go right ahead and "ditch windows" and run off to your precious little linux. The sooner people do that, the sooner that commodity POS OS becomes the favorite target of virus writers.

[Steven N]

Is there anything these guys don't mess up?

Come on, a vulnerability when viewing JPEG files? This is getting totally rediculous.

M$ can have a big talent in marketing, but they have an even bigger talent in finding ways to put vulnerabilities into stuff that is invulnerable.

Don't get it...

Thankfully. no.

The brains at Redmond are so busy putting direct pressure on
XP's wounds that they have little time for anything else. This is
good, because anything else they promolgated on society might
be just a bad, or maybe worse.

So, look the bright side, Windows fans. If MS released Longhorn
you would have twice as much to complain about.

[Tex Murphy PI]

Not really new news

I recall that someone said that this was possible a few years back.

They theorized that it was possible to ACTIVATE a pre-installed program just by openning a JPG file.

However, it didn't theorize the possibility of really poor code that will decode a JPG and run it as a virus.

This one is REALLY bad, even for Microsoft.

Yep.

You got that right. It's fascinating how the dates change but the
names stay the same.

Anyone else notice CNET keeps this story prominent?

Even though it was posted 20 hours ago, it's third story from the top among much newer news releases.

CNET == BIASED NEWS COMPANY.

[Not Bugged]

Maybe it's because...

Most of the people who'll be viewing this site will be using Windows, therefore they'll be vulnerable to the bug. As a news site, it's their duty to get the news to the people that need to see it, and most people need to see this article.

Longhorn 64-bit released ahead of schedule

Cnet would have nothing bad to report about Microsoft if there
was nothing bad to report about Windows.

I'm sure that when MS announces the first commercial release of
its new 64-bit OS with WinFS that cnet will be the first to tell the
world the wonderful news that the new and improved OS only
requires 2 GB of RAM and 4 GB of disc space.

[48911984]

Hmmm . . . CNET

Morning Dispatch -- Headline Number 1

"1. Flaws threaten Windows, Linux PCs"

*********************************************
Truth in journalism . . . The JPEG flaw threatens all Internet connected XP and higher machines and pretty much everything running IE.

This flaw is going to expose alot of people.

_THIS_IS_BAD!_ Lots-o-Risk!

*********************************************
As well, on another note, SAMBA has a vulnerability. It isn't Linux that has the vulnerability. Although SAMBA is found on alot of Linux servers, it isn't on every Linux box. And, SAMBA is an enterprise server service. If an employee launched a DOS attack at a SAMBA server, they would be dismissed.

This flaw won't expose anyone unless they are stupid enough to run SAMBA on the Internet. And, then, you still can't take over the server . . . just make it unavailable.

_THIS_IS_NOT_SO_BAD!_ Minimal risk . . .

*********************************************
So, CNET has misrepresented/scewed the truth once more. Kinda makes you wonder who signs their checks . . .

One thing is for certain. They will say there is something wrong with Linux every chance they can get.

FYI - I am not a Linux zealot. I use what works. I use what is realiable. And, I use what is secure. Other than that, I don't care what I use as long as I can get my work done.

Don't make me guess.

What works for you? C'mon, tell us.

[David Arbogast]

Complete Waste of Time

Once again, news.com published an article that isn't really news just to get the Linux zealots to beat their drums.

Wow... a flaw in an Operating System that has ALREADY been patched. BEFORE it was EVER exploited. Amazing. So very news worthy.

Keep up the good work, Microsoft.

[Not Bugged]

Probably not patched...

You may have patched it, the other people reading this article may have patched it, but a large amount of people won't have patched it. Many PC users struggle sending e-mail. Many treat a PC as a glorified console. These people won't have patched the OS, and these are the people for whom this article is written.

You funny, man!

I do recall the chorus of condemnation from Windows World
when it was announced by Intego that OS X was susceptible to a
Trojan Horse.

Now, Windows users suffer a similar fate, but dismiss the threat.

I get it now!

When OS X is discovered to have a security problem this IS news,
because OS X is inherently more secure. When Windows is
discovered to have a security problem it is NOT news, because,
well, its Windows - what else?

What...

What Microsoft can't even get JPG support right now. Just how pathetic are they going to get?

Robert