Comments on: Dell poised to benefit most from PC market recovery
The PC maker will see improvement when its corporate customers start buying computers again later this year and into 2010.
The PC maker will see improvement when its corporate customers start buying computers again later this year and into 2010.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Your destination for the latest news on enterprise-level information technology, from chip research and server design to software issues including programming, open source and patents.
Add this feed to your online news reader
http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/16/analyst.says.sell.ms.stock/
Whoever wrote that macnn article is an idiot. At any given day you can find numerous analyst to recommend anything... hold, buy, sell, whatever. It's not "a rare move" to change recommendations... usually happens about once a quarter.
Here's a recent price target upgrade for Microsoft:
"June 16 (Reuters) - Jefferies & Co raised its price target on Microsoft Corp's (MSFT.O) stock to $26 from $22 and recommended buying shares of the world's largest software company ahead of a possibly large, rapid corporate PC upgrade cycle starting in late 2010.
[...]
The brokerage said it expected Microsoft's stock to SIGNIFICANTLY OUTPERFORM ITS PEERS and the S&P 500 index .SPX over the next 12 to 18 months."
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssSoftware/idUSBNG31831820090616
I agree gggg ssss. I just got a Dell Studio XPS 16. Way more power for my money than I could have gotten with a Mac.
I do love this thing, even though it runs Vista it is very fast.
Atom based Netbooks I understand, but Atom based desktops I think are a bit of a harder sell. People are trying to save money, but I don't think people would buy a desktop that ironically is less powerful than their old desktop. Even a lot of recent Celerons have more performance than the best Atom processor.
What economic indicators are you using to substantiate this impending turnaround in 2010? Did the government stop printing up money? Are we as a nation producing more goods and services than we consume all of the sudden?
That's what I thought...
- by i_made_this July 17, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
- I agree with Otellini's bearish view that the PC market will not recover to previous levels.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)The American consumer has shifted demand for desktops over to notebooks. This pretty much leaves the future of desktops in the hands of business and government buyers. Value is the target issue.
Otellini's marketing team will be trying to convince enterprise buyers to vacuum up all of his old Pentium chips lying around; or they could take his Atom chips for half the price.
Still, AMD will be the force for Intel to reckon with on the enterprise value proposition. If demand picks up, I'd have to forecast that AMD will walk away with the relatively strongest revenues improvement.
No matter the hardware selected, these deep value enterprise buyers may finally consider the Ubuntu operating system loaded with OpenOffice, Firefox etc. Other highly developed countries have done so and it's overdue we do the same. If we're talking about government buyers, then its your and my tax dollars being spent. I encourage everyone to make your feelings known to your local Senators and Congressmen about the election of hardware and software.
The article infers they'd tried Vista and will be ready for Vista's big sister, Seven. I suspect what it meant to say was they'd tried XP and will be ready to make two jumps up to Seven.
Either way, for government sales, I'd prefer my tax money go to Ubuntu with Firefox or Opera, OpenOffice and the rest.
Enterprises seem to be saying it's time for a change and I agree. I hope they make the move to Ubuntu - some will for certain, but others will need people to educate them that there are options to Windows - particularly if the taxpayer's goal is deep cost savings with significant productivity gains. Other Linux distro's like Red Hat Enterprise can be significantly more expensive than Ubuntu Enterprise, which is why I favor the latter for government accounts. The difference versus Windows must be significant enough to motivate large enterprise buyers to make a change.