• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party

Court orders Wikileaks be taken offline

February 18, 2008 8:06 PM PST – Posted by Anne Dujmovic

Whistle-blower Web site Wikileaks.org has been effectively ordered offline by a California court. Last week, the court ordered domain name registrar Dynadot to remove all DNS entries for that domain. According to a story by the BBC, Dynadot was also ordered to "prevent the domain name from resolving to the wikileaks.org website or any other website or server other than a blank park page, until further order of this Court." Swiss banking group Julius Baer Bank and documents surrounding its offshore activities are at the center of the controversy. The Wikileaks.org site is still available here.

Read the full BBC story: "Whistle-blower site taken offline"

Read Declan McCullagh's take in CNET News.com's The Iconoclast blog: "Wikileaks domain name yanked in spat over leaked documents"

Anne Dujmovic is an associate editor at CNET News. After working more than a dozen years in newspapers, including a seven-year stint at the San Jose Mercury News, Anne migrated north to Portland, Ore. There, she honed her pastry-making skills as an apprentice. Although she's returned to journalism, she still misses the free pastries. E-mail Anne.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by W2Kuser February 18, 2008 11:35 PM PST
They also demanded, and got, the IP# of all visitors as part of the court order.
Reply to this comment
by mcondo February 19, 2008 11:31 AM PST
Visitors are just that. They can arrive due to news articles, radio reports and word of mouth. Releasing their IP# is an invasion of privacy. These draconian tactics are what's driving this country to the trash heap. The Judge seems to be caving in to industry demands at the expense of the whole planet, when one considers the consequences of removing many of the documents to be found at wikileaks.
When the light of day is allowed to shine into the records of those who deny the truth and thwart the progress of science we'll have a chance of surviving a couple more decades.
by Al Feldzamen February 19, 2008 4:16 AM PST
Perhaps a movement could be started to send the judge a copy of the CONSTITUTION?
Reply to this comment
by superforestnyc February 19, 2008 6:55 AM PST
The net treats censorship like damage, it simply finds ways to route around the affected parts.
Squeeze as tight as you like, but the truth will find a way.
Transparency is the key to future growth.
Reply to this comment
by MorsethDiamond February 19, 2008 7:02 AM PST
After all, this is the "people's republic of Kalifornia"
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
What is News.com Extra?
Our reporters and editors handpick the tech stories you shouldn't miss.
News Extra RSS Feed
Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN
Submit a story to News Extra
Got a tech topic not already covered on CNET News today? Write up an intro, include the link, and send it in for consideration.
Submit a story
Recent posts from News.com Extra
How fast is your flash?
Baseball 2008: Parsing prof's pennant picks
High hopes for China's 'eco-city'
The $350,000 big-screen, 3D 'VisWall'
How we hear one voice amid many
The most prescient sci-fi movies ever
Sound recording predates Edison's phonograph
A low-tech 2010 census?
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right