Apple acknowledges Snow Leopard data loss issue
For the past month, some Mac OS X users have been reporting their personal data missing after logging into their guest accounts, and Apple now says it's working on finding a fix.
"We are aware of the issue, which occurs only in extremely rare cases, and we are working on a fix," an Apple representative said in a prepared statement Monday.
(Credit:
Apple)
It's the first time Apple has said it is looking into the issue. In early September, a handful of Mac users reported the issue on Apple's discussion boards. The problem, when it occurs, goes like this, according to CNET's MacFixit: when logging into the guest account on their Mac first and then logging into their regular account, some users are finding all their data to be missing and their accounts completely reset.
It doesn't appear to be a widespread problem--there are fewer than 100 posts on several current discussion threads on the issue--but it's certainly topical. Microsoft is currently dealing with a massive data loss at its Danger subsidiary, the company it acquired that makes the Sidekick mobile phone.
Apple's data loss issue is also yet another problem related to its most recent operating-system release. Snow Leopard has been plagued with bugs since its release, including problems with the Finder hanging or crashing, incompatibility with certain apps, and the AirPort connection dropping.
Although Apple doesn't yet have an answer for why this is occurring, you can check here for some suggested fixes, if you're experiencing the problem.
Erica Ogg is a CNET News reporter who covers Apple, HP, Dell, and other PC makers, as well as the consumer electronics industry. She's also one of the hosts of CNET News' Daily Podcast. In her non-work life, she's a history geek, a loyal Dodgers fan, and a mac-and-cheese connoisseur. E-mail Erica. 





Snow Leopard did give me the Airport connection drop problem but not enough to disrupt connections to the network. Vista, except for all the little annoyance as reported, has been reliable and stable. I am not too taken with its UI but our work requires VISTA so it lives.
oh i've dealt with you before. I'm not even going to answer.
Is the Snow Leopard Guest account similar to the one in Windows? What is it for? I can't imagine many Windows users would use the one in Windows for instance.
Also, I have the same comment for win7. It is very reliable so far and by far the best OS I've ever used. There will be those rare cases that get a bad wrap for OSX and Win7.
In Snow Leopard, It is seen as gone, but it is still there. The data is not deleted from the HD, and because it's local (not on a cloud), you can get it back. The system simply forgets that your user folder is linked to your user's data, a pain, but not the end of the world.
The fixes have been straight forward from what I've read. You need to use terminal commands (hardly easy for some), but you basically tell the system that your user folder has moved to a new blank folder, then tell it it's moved again back to your original folder.
I've never lost data in OS X, despite about 10 different macs running it over time, from 10.1 through 10.6. And these people haven't lost data either. It's just gone missing for a minute, but it's all there.
Macs just work- unless they don't. That's true of anything.
It actually deletes the home folder and creates a new blank one.
An offline undelete program (Data Rescue II) was not able to recover any of the lost files and folders from the home folder that was nuked by Snow Leopard.
(note that this bug is not the same as the issues in previous versions of MacOSX where the home folder is accidentally "renamed" to something else which can be recovered via several Terminal commands)
And no...the system did not "simply forget"....it deleted everything in the folder and then started afresh.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/12/snow_leopard_guest_account_bug_deletes_user_data.html
No problem though I'll just keep my guest account disabled.
What's the big deal? So a few people lose their data when the OS flakes and deletes data permamently. It's not like your data is important or anything, right? And you did make regular backups with Time Machine so ... it doesn't really matter if this gets fixed or not. It's a non-issue, right?
"Telling a Mac user to use a terminal is likely to be met with blank stares. The entire point of OS X was to insulate end users from the operating system's back end. I would not be comfortable in trying to walk people through using a terminal window. That's just not the sort of thing I want some grandmother doing."
Terminal use is as easy as typing something that you read on screen, in the case where instructions have been prepared for a known fix. Then you press "Enter" - not exactly impossible to comprehend. Let's try an experiment - can you call up Notepad and type exactly "lorem ipsum quad infinitum" , then press the Return key? If you fail to accomplish this simple task, then yes, the Terminal is too hard for you. Otherwise it is not.
BTW, how do you pretend to know what the "entire point of OSX" was? The reason they put in so many system utilities, such as the Unix terminal, is that you can do anything you want to. Having more tools is never a detriment....
"The entire point of OS X was to insulate end users from the operating system's back end."
I think you meant MacOS, and you would be correct. Apples marketing was all about no command line back in the days of Windows 3.1 and Windows 95. Looks like they needed it anyway and changed their tune. :)
It's unusual to have them ever acknowledge anything like this and when they do, it's usually much larger than they let on publically.
" the 100 or so people who are reporting the issue, out of millions who installed snow leopard? "
That's a hard thing to do with Apple. They have a known habit of deleting threads in the forums that are negative about the products or catch them in embarassing situations. Usually they keep a few threads around about any one topic that might be negative, but it's not unusual for them to simply delete any and all threads about the problem.
Might be better to go look at a non-Apple controlled site instead.
http://www.appledefects.com/?p=245
(Apple deleting threads about macbook screen flicker issue)
http://www.appledefects.com/?p=215
(Apple censoring comments on macbook nvidia bugs)
http://forums.appleinsider.com/showthread.php?t=72841
(thread about apple deleting embarrassing tech support threads)
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1624783&tstart=0
(discussion on apple boards about apple's policy of deleting threads that make them look bad)
I don't want to start trolling, so this will be my last comment on this article. Just want to point out something to you in particular -- you post troll-like comments on every Microsoft related article. Hopefully Dans' comments (and the links above backing them up) help you realize that there are two sides to every story.
I'm afraid I cannot quote Apple stating that they have deleted threads, but then that would be like asking a thieif if they are guilty, yes?
Besides, @dhavleak has given more than enough examples for me right there alone. It's not an unknown situation.
Apple SL is marred with bugs...
Apple SL is marred with bugs...
What will Apple Fanboys do now :D
eat it guys...
"its very easy to fix, hardly an annoyance" and finish with "its a new awsome feature of the OS, that the users did not use properly".
Double standards anyone?
Double standards anyone?
I'll just keep using Snow Leopard, (and i guess i'll try to find these bugs you claim it has)
Have installed and reinstalled the damn thing [SL] 15 times and it still won't detect my Airport wifi and bluetooth. It was working fine with Leopard but the upgrade messed it up.
Just dropped off my MBP at the Apple store 3 hrs ago and have to wait 2 weeks for the parts to come in and for them to test whats going on!...this is its 2nd breakage in a week.
Just picked it up on Friday after it got its 3rd Logic board and first Ambient light sensor replaced. Now the whole upper body and its sensors and its Airport card has to be replaced. TALK ABOUT QUALITY HARDWARE.
I did not pay a premium for this.. To be without a computer for 4 whole months. Its like a premature baby that needs consistent care and surgery. I have barely gotten to use the damn thing. The most I used it for is was 4 hrs and thats it, after that it went into a frenzy of broken this and broken that...when will this thing end??? They refuse to give me a new laptop. [atleast for now].
If you've got a Mac there is an easy way to stop this:
Disable the guest login. Now if you NEED that functionality, create an account with suitable low privilege (perhaps named "Visitor") and use that. I've heard that disabling guest account then re-enabling it works - but I've not seen this, so I'd get advice from Apple before you rely on that. I guess it's worth stating, unless you actually need guest access don't switch it on (regardless of this bug) the system is harder to compromise if you can't get past the login (Windows, Mac, whatever...)
I must have missed that memo. Last time I checked OS X was on a par with Windows. Nothing I've seen on either side leads me to believe that either is better than the other overall. In certain areas, yes. Overall. No.
You sir are a good mac. You stand for your brand and wish it prosperity and wealth yet are willing to accept fault and place blame. I like mac but personally I'm a PC guy(not a fanboi predication I'm literally sitting and an XP and an OSX system right now). I don't think pc guys hate mac for everything they have going but rather for this whitewash infallible unimpeachable mac. I know PC either Win or Lin is not perfect and it's nice to know that some mac users feel the same.
as for the flaw. sounds like it sux I'm sure mac will fix in a jiff hope it didn't rain on too many parades.
Really? I've been running the system since it was released and I've seen nary a problem. Especially in comparison to other releases such as Windows XP, Vista, Ubuntu 8.10, and the original Mac OS X Leopard. There might have been a couple problems but to say it's been "plagued" is taking a bit too much literary license.
CNET always seems to feel the need to prove that Apple isn't perfect whether or not there's basis for the argument in what they're discussing at the time. Thanks CNET, most of your readers already know that there is no such thing as a perfect computer. You can take your journalistic integrity back now.
Upgrading to SL from Leopard is a noticeable speed increase, as opposed to Vista which was a speed decrease.
Windows 7 is going to wipe out Mac like the Jedi.
7 isn't going to wipe out anything. 7 isn't really better than SL so the debate over which is better isn't enough to amount to a hill of meh.
It's not a widespread issue, but people are talking about it. Snow Leopard is so plagued with bugs CNET reviews rated it Excellent saying, "Hidden among smaller tweaks are some technical improvements that result in a smoother, easier-to-use Leopard with plenty for Mac fans to be excited about. The user interface and everyday tasks feel faster in general" So again Erica plagued? Really? Captain Crunch journalism school having their alumni reunion yet?
Why mention Microsoft in the article, Erica? Sure sounds like an attempt to down play the MAC issue.
As for saying that Snow Leopard is "Plagued" with problems I think that you have the wrong definition of plegue. A plegue is a widespread problem that affects most people in a given area with fatal consequences. As for saying that Snow Leopard, there were older versions of software that did not work and people needed to update them with newer versions or free updates. Wow how novel that you update the OS and you need newer versions of software to run on them. There were programs that were not compatible right when Apple released Snow Leopard but that was because they released it a month early and some of the software companies were finishing their work.
Airport problem was fixed with the 10.6.1 free update that came out within a few weeks of the initial release of Snow Leopard.
Now a couple of months after release 100 or so cases of people are having a problem with loosing files after logging on as a guest. Annoying yes. Is there a way to recover the files? Yes. Does apple admit to the problem and are they looking for a way to fix it for what I imagine is less than one percent of there customer base? Yes.
Now a plague of problems? I see three problems with only two being an actual apple problem. One of those is fixed and the other is limited to a very small portion of the people who are running Snow Leopard.
A question for those people who are bashing Apple products. Have you ever used an Apple product or are you bashing with prejudice and rumor? If you have used an Apple product have you used one in the last couple of years with long exposure to the operating system? If you ahve answered no to either of these than do not post your drivel about Apple products.
And yes I do use both a Mac and a PC. PC for games and Mac for basically everything else.
It's a double standard.
I suppose you don't have any mirrors in your house or else you might recognize the irony of what you just commented.
In your allmost all Mac office you keep some PC's around because your Mac's fall short of the job you have to do. That's a statment of fact not a question. I've read your posts. Seems like we all have the problem that the perfect computer hasn't been invented and we have to work around it. The smart ones are willing to admit this and some of us hope that Apple (and others) listen.
http://gizmodo.com/5379865/are-apple-time-capsules-short-lived
Do we need a time capsule for the time capsule, so that if your TC fails, you can restore that? NO. You get it repaired/replaced, then restore from your WORKING computer.
Get a life.
You sure are fast to jump on any Microsoft stories to go on about how inferior all their products are, how PC's are horrible, the hardware fails, nothing is reliable, and that Apple is glorious holiness of all things aluminum and white plastic.
And now here you are apologizing and making excuses for a failure of an Apple product. Do you see the irony in play here?
Guess what- all products have issues. You deal with them and move on. I back up my data because it's just prudent. That means I back up my data from PC's, Mac's, and from the Linux boxen. That's because I take precautions and don't believe that any one product is the be all / end all solution to the exclusion of all others.
It's more surprising that Apple finally acknowledged the issue even exists. Their usual method for addressing problems is to deny everything, say it's all perfectly normal, then release an update for iTunes that has nothing to do with the problem but coincidentally fixes the issue reported.
Apple, like most companies, rarely admits when they are wrong. It usually is only when there is great risk of public outrage. I like their products just not always wild about the way they behave with this sort of thing.
Apple took weeks to admt they had problems with Mobile Me. It took them weeks to acknowledge they screwed up the iPhone release with trying to get activations done. It is very rare for them to come out and announce there is a problem without someone first pushing at them or making the issue very public.
Look to their history of deleting forum threads that are negative about Apple products or expose problems that they don't want to have public.
It's just the way most of the industry is these days, but Apple is tops when it comes to being secretive- even if it means hiding things they don't want to have known.
It's no big deal.
Why do you feel the need to throw mud at MS to justify your choices? You're obvisouly a big fan of Apple's products, and you're obviously very happy with them. But why do you feel the need to convince everyone else that the your way is the only way? In Dan's defense, he's pointing out a behaviour pattern for Apple that's extremely well known and documented. I provided links in my first reply to back that up. You asked Dan for proof, but here you are making the same claims about MS without any proof.
Obviously you don't like it when people say bad things about Apple. But yet you feel free to take pot shots at other people's choices all the time?
MSFT hasn't taken the extra steps of trying to hide the facts, delete forum threads that may be embarasing to the company's image, or gone out of their way to pretend nothing is wrong. Patching issues in the OS through unrelated iTunes updates is a classic Apple example.
I'm sorry if the truth is uncomfortable for your opinion of Apple, but it is what it is.
Here the bug is Mac "forgets" that the users Home folder should be considered their Home folder and blithely creates a new one. The user sees the newly created Home folder and thinks "ARGH, Where did I my stuff go?" Now I'm not about to downplay this, as bugs go this is a doozy. It is recoverable if you know what you're looking at and what to do. But for a lot of users that won't be the case, and they'll be visiting an Apple store, or Googling the answer or just panic. Now few Mac users will actually encounter this (the broken feature isn't used by the vast majority of users - not that makes it any better). Apple are "working on a fix" which seems like the wrong tense (they could easily switch the feature off via an update, remember the previous setting then switch it back on when it was working again - properly explained to the user, of course). This bug should have been spotted and fixed before Snow Leopard shipped, but it wasn't - it happens.
Now Microsoft/Danger is another matter entirely. Here this wasn't a flaw in the Danger/Sidekick system (not a bug) it was bad management, upgrading a live system with no backup in place is a bad idea. Anyone who knows anything about computers knows this. I can only imagine why they did this. (Are Microsoft really that cash strapped?) However this has caused the loss of customer data, this is not an "OS bug" as such, it's rather less forgivable than that. This was utter stupidity on Microsoft's part. Microsoft took over Danger two years ago, we can't blame this on "outside technology".
The two cases are as different as they can be. One is a bug at OS level, the other is incompetence at the most basic level.
About to go and buy and netbook with Windows 7
damn... hate Apple
- by alston2 October 12, 2009 6:23 PM PDT
- recently installed SL, zero problems, incredibly quick.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by SpiritWater October 12, 2009 7:15 PM PDT
- People keep saying it is quick but I haven't noticed that. I do notice more crashes in Safari than before but it is still early. Prior to 10.6.1 I got the spinning-beach-ball-of-death in both Mail and Safari. That's not to be confused with Windows' blue-screen-of-death which crashes the whole system. The spinning beach ball doesn't crash the system since you can force-quit Safari. 10.6.2 should make the whole OSX more stable and make those spinning beach-balls none existant, since I never had one in 10.5.
- Like this
-
- by Jeremy Chappell October 13, 2009 3:59 AM PDT
- I think the speed is mostly "to come". The Finder is vastly improved (finally). Safari? Depends on what it's doing, most of the time I can't really tell the difference - the bottleneck is elsewhere. I have Win7 on a far newer system, most of that is fast - but what the hell is it with IE?! Google Chrome works well on Win7 - very fast. It's hard to do a "fair" comparison between the two, speed wise the Mac could be faster (but it's very old) and the PC is satisfyingly quick (but it's young). I don't hate Win7, but actually I don't have much software to run on it - so the Mac is better for me (because I do have lots of Mac apps). So the question has to be, if I were buying a computer tomorrow would I buy a Mac or a PC?
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 4 pages (197 Comments)Well I'd get a Mac, but there are a few qualifiers. If I was looking for games, well I should get a PC. I can run PC games on a Mac but the experience won't be as good for the cash (I've got to buy a Mac, then buy Windows for it, and Macs aren't really setup for games, if "money is no object" then that's a Mac Pro, and it can't link the cards together - sure I get a Server class CPU, but that's not what I need for games). If I don't want games, but I want to run this or that PC program pretty much all the time, then a Mac is a waste of time - once running Windows it's a PC, a business app could run under something like VMware Fusion, but unless I'm also running some Mac app most of the time what's the point? However it most other cases a Mac (for me) edges out the PC. Then there are times when not getting a Mac is stupid. When a Mac app is the best choice (Logic Pro, Final Cut Pro ... and a few others) or when you're doing Web Development (you can run multiple versions of Windows, Linux as well as Mac OS X - suddenly you can test on one box). Then there's iPhone development...