November 11, 2009 2:53 PM PST

Google plans Chrome Mac beta for December

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 27 comments

Google plans to release a Mac beta of Chrome in early December, judging by some chatter on a mailing list for the browser.

Chrome 4.0 is available today as a beta version for Windows but only as a rougher developer-preview version on Linux and Mac OS X. The standout feature of the new version is customization through extensions, a technology that long has been a core asset of another open-source browser, Firefox.

Google has been moving to a new extensions presentation technology called Browser Actions that let people interact with extensions through a small button toward the upper right of the browser window. "We've noticed that many of you have updated your extensions to take advantage of the new UI. We'd like to encourage the rest of you to do so as well," said Nick Baum, a Google Chrome product manager, in a mailing list posting.

But here's the hitch: Browser Actions only work on Windows and Linux right now. That means those building extensions will leave Mac Chrome users behind for a time. But in telling those developers they won't have long to wait, Baum mentioned the deadline for the beta version.

"The earlier you switch, the more time you will have to polish your experience for our Beta launch in early December," he said.

And Google is on the case for adding Browser Actions to the Mac version of Chrome.

"We realize this means dropping Mac support for a couple of weeks, but we already have people working on that," Baum said. "If you prioritize the Windows and Linux versions, we'll bring you cross-platform parity as soon as we can!"

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Deep Tech
Mozilla hopes to finish Thunderbird 3.1 in April
Adobe adds raw support for newer cameras
Mozilla releases fifth Firefox 3.6 beta
Apple update supports new Canon, Nikon raw files
Plurk holding Microsoft's feet to code-copying fire
Ubuntu Linux founder stepping down as CEO
Browser makers hope WebGL will remake 3D
Google project shows when Web content is hiding
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (27 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 11, 2009 3:17 PM PST
dont understand. what's the big deal about chrome on the mac. It uses webkit like Safari. It has fewer features than Safari. Also (not 100% sure) it is slower than 64-bit safari.
Reply to this comment
by MPB-G17 November 11, 2009 5:20 PM PST
yeah chrome looks pretty good but i think i'm going to stay with 64bit safari.
by FF2009 November 11, 2009 3:18 PM PST
Looks horrendous on my Ubuntu box. I had to uninstal it immediately!

browsed Cnet.com with it and it was real slow and buggy.

This browser is to primitive compare to others. Maybe in a few years it will catch up.
Reply to this comment
by MeepMan November 11, 2009 4:02 PM PST
Actually, CNet is basically the only problematic site with Chrome. It has been addressed, then broken again.
by hippie_dream November 11, 2009 8:30 PM PST
Weird. I am using Chrome on Ubuntu right. Looks great, really delivers on speed. Frankly I am impressed. Once it gets a little traction, I think Chrome will take another chunk off of IE. And I imagine, yes even on Macs, it will get popular.
by jake3373 November 13, 2009 7:40 PM PST
I installed Chrome on Ubuntu and it runs OK (still needs some basic features and it has bugs - but that is why Google classified it as an unstable prerelease). In my opinion, it needs to work more with Ubuntu's theme (but this must be hard if Google tries to support many Linux distros). I still use Firefox as my main Linux browser. Chrome on Windows is very good, though.
by Firehazel November 28, 2009 6:22 PM PST
I'm using chrome beta (4.0.223.16) on windows. faster than Fireox currently, and my computer is fresh. it only gets stucatto whenever I convert VOB files to H.264 using a 2pass method... that's it. i can have like 18 tabs open and still be good.
by GSPhotography November 11, 2009 3:33 PM PST
Do Mac users even care about this anymore? I don't. They announced (began work) on Chrome like 6 months ago, maybe more. Now it's going to be 2 more months before a beta. For a company that has redefined the meaning of beta (you can be sure Chrome will be "beta" for AT LEAST 5 years), who cares, really? We've got Safari and Firefox. Best browsers on the planet with full functionality. Who wants to mess with another eternal beta browser? Meh.
Reply to this comment
by MPB-G17 November 12, 2009 5:22 AM PST
yeah i'm not all that existed either.
by Yelonde November 16, 2009 7:34 PM PST
Chrome has been a disappointment. I was really excited for it back in the day, but after a year of it being windows native, I have decided that there is no need to install it. It is based on safari's webkit anyway, I might as well use the original safari.
by Mr. Dee November 11, 2009 3:52 PM PST
I think the delay of Chrome by 3 versions on the Mac now prove that OS X is still a ghetto for developers while Linux is a gutter, even by its staunchest supporters.
Reply to this comment
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 11, 2009 4:01 PM PST
I think you don't know what you're talking about and shouldn;t be commenting here. Chrome aint that attractive to mac users anyway.
by Mr. Dee November 11, 2009 4:49 PM PST
Are you comparing me to you Gold_Storm_Mac? Because Apple and Steve Jobs have stated many times, Mac users don't know what they want and you happen to buy what he wants, not what you want. So basically you are subjected to a very rich guy that lives in California's ability to buy and build what he wants. You cannot tell me where to comment either, the last time I checked, the URL for this article is not http://news.gold_storm.mac.cnet.com So stop talking stupidity and go apply more patches to your Mac infested bee hive!
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 11, 2009 5:09 PM PST
at least mac and linux users get the best features before windows users do :)
Microsoft only has tons of dev cause of their market share.
otherwise mac and especially linux are great platforms for dev.
by exactlyy November 11, 2009 5:23 PM PST
and here we go .. Mac troll detected .
take it easy Mr.Dee, thats their only strategy , 1st they say .. you dont know what you talking about .
and the 2nd reply w'd be .. your so stupid, your english sucks..even if english is your 1st language and its the only language you know ..
and if nothing of what they works ..they w'd start with.. I'am cool , i am MAC .. i am Hot ..
i even started to belive this s-h-i-t and i am thinking about having a bunch of them in my bed .
by MPB-G17 November 11, 2009 5:43 PM PST
@Mr Dee

You have no idea what you are talking about. I think the reason you constantly criticise Apple is because you feel threaten by their success compared to your beloved Microsoft. I think you are narrow minded and naive if you think that people just buy Apple technology because Steve Jobs tells them to. You just refuse to think that iPod, iPhone or Mac sales are the result of a good product that people want. You can comment all you like, but every time you post a comment you prove how ignorant you really are.
by MPB-G17 November 11, 2009 5:50 PM PST
@Mr Dee

You have no idea what you are talking about. I think the reason you constantly criticise Apple is because you feel threaten by their success compared to your beloved Microsoft. I think you are narrow minded and naive if you think that people just buy Apple technology because Steve Jobs tells them to. You just refuse to think that iPod, iPhone or Mac sales are the result of a good product that people want. You can comment all you like, but every time you post a comment you prove how ignorant you really are.
by ckh1272 November 12, 2009 1:35 AM PST
@exactlyy-Mac troll detected? How about you. You're the one, once again, commenting on an APPLE related article and making blanket assumptions and generalizations about things you have no clue about. Same applies to Mr. Dee, but that is not news to anyone that knows better.
by slumbergod November 11, 2009 4:49 PM PST
What frustrates me is that they always prioritise Windows over Linux and Mac. It isn't like they sell the software. Who cares if there are more Windows users. Their efforts for alternative platforms (of which Google employees benefit greatly themselves) is half-hearted at best.
Reply to this comment
by jake3373 November 13, 2009 7:44 PM PST
Even if they don't sell it for $$$$$, it still gets downloaded more on Windows than on Mac or Linux, and they want their browser to be as popular as possible.
by beforsberg November 11, 2009 5:12 PM PST
Mac users already have enough browsers available to them. Firefox and Safari is all we need. Google is wasting time putting another browser out there that will most likely get little use.
Reply to this comment
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 11, 2009 6:50 PM PST
no ads
Reply to this comment
by Jamie_Foster November 12, 2009 1:26 AM PST
Who wants this adware rubbish when there are browsers like Firefox and Opera around.
Reply to this comment
by Jamie_Foster November 12, 2009 1:27 AM PST
As if Google doesn't have enough info on your websurfing habits as it is,.
Reply to this comment
by donovan1983 November 12, 2009 1:46 AM PST
I'm using the developer preview version on OS X right now and it is already usable for basic browsing needs. It has some things missing, like a way to import bookmarks after the first time starting it and no ability to sync bookmarks with Google Docs, but is otherwise quite decent. It feels a tiny bit faster than Safari, too. I like the interface and that search is integrated into the address bar. I've had no issues with stability or slowdowns. It was my primary browser when I was using Windows 7 for a couple months on my Mac mini and will likely remain so in Leopard.
Reply to this comment
by XCMeathead November 12, 2009 5:01 AM PST
For all those who've made comments about Chrome being spyware, I thought you might like to see this blog post http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-communication/ it should certainly put your minds to rest :o)
Reply to this comment
by Chasingu November 14, 2009 9:21 AM PST
Can't wait, hopefully im getting a mac mini for Christmas so this will be good.
Reply to this comment
(27 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Google's top antitrust defender: 'It's fun'

Life at Google is certainly different than government service for senior competition counsel Dana Wagner, but his past and present collide on a daily basis at the search giant.

CE industry hopes 'Avatar' is a hit

Good box office returns for the 3D film are expected to spur 3D entertainment from the theater to the living room.

About Deep Tech

Stephen Shankland, who's covered the computing industry since 1998 and was a science reporter before that, here delves into a wide range of technology trends and offers hands-on tests. His particular interests include Web browsers, cameras, standards, research, science, and start-ups.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Deep Tech topics

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right