• On GameFAQs: The top 10 forgotten RPGs
October 28, 2009 2:19 PM PDT

Intel's next-gen memory closer to reality

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 28 comments

Researchers are two steps closer to creating a mass-market version of technology called phase-change memory that could change how computers of the future are put together.

Intel and Numonyx, the chipmaker's joint venture with STMicroelectonics that's focused on flash memory, announced Wednesday they've built a new type of phase-change memory chip they hope will help fulfill the technology's promise for small size and large capacity.

Its 64-megabit capacity isn't momentous on its own--Numonyx announced a 128Mb device in 2006 and Samsung said in September it's producing a 512Mb chip. But what is significant are two major advances in making the decades-old idea practical.

First, the researchers built a grid of wires into the chip so a computer can easily control the writing of a 1 or 0 in each of the 64 million memory cells. Second, they announced their manufacturing process lets them stack several layers atop each other so memory can be packed more densely in a given volume.

This image shows phase change memory built atop a conventional CMOS microchip. Memory cells can be controlled using rows and columns of wires that lead through the chip.

This image shows phase-change memory built atop a conventional CMOS microchip. Memory cells can be controlled using rows and columns of wires that lead through the chip.

(Credit: Intel)

Storing numbers in a computer hardly is new, so why could phase-change memory, which records ones and zeros by changing the molecular state of a particular type of glass, be a big deal?

In short, it could combine conventional computer memory's high speed with flash memory's low cost, low power demands, and high capacity. Having lots of fast memory on hand could simplify computer hardware and software that today must reckon with a hierarchy of storage technologies that trade off performance for capacity.

Operating systems today must constantly work to keep important information in memory while relegating the rest to "virtual memory" stored on hard drives--or, these days, an intermediate layer in the hierarchy, solid state disks made of flash memory. Deciding what goes where is complicated, and priorities change from one moment to the next.

"At Intel, we see this as an important milestone in enabling a future class of memory where you can combine attributes of memory semantics and storage semantics, potentially collapsing the technologies into one memory type," said Al Fazio, Intel's director of memory technology development, discussing the technology Wednesday. "The research is very promising in delivering that."

For another thing, phase-change memory could get around difficulties of shrinking current memory technologies to ever-smaller sizes. And for another, it could lower the power consumption, reducing waste heat and extending battery life.

A long history
But be sure to temper that promise with a long history.

Phase-change memory is a decades-old idea. Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, of Moore's Law fame, wrote a paper on the idea in 1970. It's made some headway since then: phase-change technology is used to store data on rewritable DVDs and CDs.

Intel and Numonyx aren't alone in trying to commercialize the technology. Start-up Ovonyx also is working on it, as are IBM, Samsung, and Philips Electronics. But as the years of labor show, it's been difficult bringing phase-change memory to market.

Fazio and Greg Atwood, senior technology fellow at Numonyx, took pains to say their companies' work on the technology began in earnest at the beginning of the decade.

"Significant new memory technologies are really quite rare," Atwood said. "There are many hurdles in introduction of new memory. Ten years is not an unreasonable time frame."

Arguably, Atwood said, there only are three forms of memory developed since the 1960s, he said: dynamic random access memory (DRAM) that's the mainstay of computer memory, the more expensive static dynamic random access memory (SRAM) that's often integrated on processors, and electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), of which flash is one variety.

Adding phase-change memory, sometimes called PCM, PRAM, or ovonics, therefore would be quite a departure in the history of computing.

How's it work?
Phase change memory stores 1s and 0s in a tiny patch of glass material that can be changed from one state to another--specifically, so its molecules are arranged either in a crystalline pattern or an amorphous jumble. It's conceptually similar to water being either a liquid or an ice.

In addition, Intel announced "multi-level" phase change memory in 2008 that adds two intermediate states, a move that means a single cell could hold two bits of data instead of one--the binary numbers of 00, 01, 10, or 11. That effectively doubled the 128Mbit capacity of the prototype chip to a 256Mbit chip, Intel said.

The stacking technique could increase memory density further, though there are limits, Atwood said.

"In principle, we can stack as high as we choose. In practice, every layer of memory has an additional cost," he said, requiring more processing and increasing the risks that defects will lower the yield of useful chips produced from a production batch. "There's no reason why we couldn't stack four layers for example, or potentially more."

Though the researchers are excited about stacking, the 64Mbit prototypes uses only a single layer of memory cells. "The first layer is the hardest layer," Fazio said. And today's flash memory is only one layer thick.

Like flash but unlike conventional computer memory, phase-change memory is nonvolatile, which means that once data is written, it stays put even if the power is switched off. That doesn't just preserve data when a device is off; it also means that unlike DRAM, power isn't required to keep the data in memory.

Ever smaller
Intel was cagey about just how closely packed its latest memory cells are. But the company expects to achieve the same density of memory cells as flash memory--then go beyond it eventually.

Flash memory today requires relatively high voltages--about 20 volts--to store its data, Fazio said. But high voltage and small distances are hard to put together, a fact that imposes limits on flash memory.

Today's flash memory features measure about 30 nanometers, or billionths of a meter. Because of the voltage issue and the fact that the difference between a 1 and a 0 is just "a handful of electrons," it's getting harder to shrink flash memory technology.

Phase-change memory, though, can get much smaller. "Research in the industry has shown that to be stable down to 5 nanometers and lower," Fazio said.

The new wiring grid helps keep up with the shrinking trend by providing a way to get at the data even as cells get smaller.

All this is important for the computer industry, which has struggled with the challenges of data storage.

Once upon a time, memory and processors worked at closer speeds, but they've diverged over the years, which means processors often must idle while the memory system fetches data the CPU has requested. System architects have responded by building a hierarchy of storage systems--different levels of SRAM cache memory on the chip or right next to it, DRAM that's one level removed, and hard drives a step beyond that.

Today's flash memory, which is faster than a hard drive and cheaper than conventional memory, is changing that arrangement. It's already revolutionized the portable device market with enough capacity for lots of songs, videos, and photos. Now it's begun arriving in high-end laptops with solid-state drives that offer longer battery life, higher performance, and greater ruggedness. And servers are on the cusp of major changes with the incorporation of flash memory.

But flash memory is sluggish compared to conventional memory. If phase-change memory meets its high-performance promise in coming years, expect more profound changes for computing systems.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Deep Tech
Why to embrace Firefox 3.6's new-tab ethos
Mozilla issues near-final Thunderbird 3
Offline Gmail no longer shuns attachments
Chrome extensions site now open for uploads
New standard lets browsers get a grip on files
Firefox hopes to one-up IE with fast graphics
Drobo storage gets faster eSATA interface
Mozilla not interested in building a Firefox OS
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Gold_Storm_Mac October 28, 2009 2:49 PM PDT
sounds cool.
Reply to this comment
by aMUSICsite October 29, 2009 3:57 AM PDT
Can't wait.

Congrats to Shankland for actually doing some research and writing a good well informed article on cnet, Something we don't see enough of these days.
by izmickey October 29, 2009 10:02 AM PDT
Wow, i was going to build a new computer but i guess i'll wait a littel longer since my current computer has several years left in it. Really cool stuff.
by StargateFan October 29, 2009 9:02 PM PDT
@aMUSICsite

I agree this article was very refreshing to read. I have felt for some time now a loss in quality of CNET's reporting. This article was well composed and researched well. Fantastic
by redmarine October 28, 2009 4:18 PM PDT
I hope this enters the market before my second computer purchase.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland October 28, 2009 7:49 PM PDT
I hope your first computer still has a few years of useful life in it.
by slickuser October 28, 2009 6:36 PM PDT
AMD should complain to EU that Intel is innovating...
Reply to this comment
by blackfridaysale October 28, 2009 10:27 PM PDT
Sound good!
Reply to this comment
by gfsdfge October 29, 2009 2:54 AM PDT
Awesome stuff. With new battery and solar technology, we'll make Star Tek look like an oldies show instead of a sci-fi.
Reply to this comment
by Super2online October 29, 2009 4:02 AM PDT
Until we learn to travel at light speed, anything approaching Star Trek tech is a pipe dream.
by ark_v2 October 29, 2009 1:51 PM PDT
We've already surpassed them in computer sound and finish :D
by celticbrewer October 30, 2009 7:01 AM PDT
I'll take a replicator over light speed travel any day :-)
by lalittp October 29, 2009 6:13 AM PDT
Nice article, thanks.
Reply to this comment
by kabukicho2001 October 29, 2009 7:51 AM PDT
It's the switching time ts that makes PCM, and other replacements for flash memory, most interesting. PCM's temperature sensitivity is perhaps its most notable drawback, one that may make changes in the production process of manufacturing technology.
Reply to this comment
by jjesusfreak01 October 29, 2009 8:10 AM PDT
This is pretty cool. Along with SSDs, led backlighting (or oled displays), and next generation lithium cells, we might just be seeing days of battery life out of our computers instead of hours...oh, and did I mention that booting up will be a thing of the past? With non volatile ram, you can put the computer in standby, and all it has to do is turn off the cpu and graphics card, and it will stop using power. If those components eventually get NV ram, then you wont really be putting your computer in standby as much as freezing it in place with a nearly instant resume. Cool stuff, now im off to read about nuclear propulsion!
Reply to this comment
by C433Z October 30, 2009 10:32 PM PDT
pretty much, except for the SSD part. I think this technology might replace it all together.

I'm might be a little more excited about the prospect of OLED screens in laptops than anything else. no more bad viewing angles, out-of-this-world contrast ratio, super thin, etc.
by bawkbawkboo1 October 29, 2009 10:37 AM PDT
"In short, it could combine the conventional computer memory's high speed with flash memory's low cost, low power demands, and high capacity."

I'm pretty sure you meant to say something else. That sentence doesn't really make sense if you are comparing HDDs to RAM, which is what it sounds like. I think you meant to say something like this:

"In short, it could combine the HDD's low cost per unit with RAM's high speed, low power demands, and low space requirements."
Reply to this comment
by Shankland October 29, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
Actually, there was an extraneous "the" left over. Thanks--though I didn't get into the hard drive part of the memory hierarchy, just flash and DRAM.
by douggdangger October 29, 2009 11:21 AM PDT
"Not fair, Americans are beating our brains out. Please slap them with a lawsuit!" AMD share holders.
Reply to this comment
by C433Z October 29, 2009 11:52 AM PDT
Lightpeak, now this? Wow, years from now we'll have laptops with OLED screens and can move and save information, faster than you can shake a stick at :)
Reply to this comment
by MrRetardo October 29, 2009 4:10 PM PDT
Nice improvement, but I wont get too excited just yet.

Anyone remember Intel's last Memory Innovation? RAMBUS??
Reply to this comment
by The_Computer_Man October 30, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
LOL, that's exactly what I was just thinking...
by pentest November 1, 2009 5:10 PM PST
Rambus was not developed by Intel, they just bet on the wrong horse.
by sandra020554 October 29, 2009 5:19 PM PDT
Sounds Kool to me!
Reply to this comment
by polis12 October 31, 2009 6:22 AM PDT
Good to see an article on CNET that isn't an opinionated blog seemingly snatched off Twitter or Google News.
Reply to this comment
by Shinespark October 31, 2009 4:40 PM PDT
If this is implemented well, this might keep MRAM off the table for even longer. It's all the same to me-- I'm primarily interested in the idea of (fast) non-volatile memory plugged into my motherboard.
Reply to this comment
by symbolset November 1, 2009 9:07 PM PST
The Z-dimension. It seems obvious in restrospect.
Reply to this comment
by MrBenjamin November 1, 2009 11:55 PM PST
Intel Innovation!
Reply to this comment
(28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Deep Tech

Stephen Shankland, who's covered the computing industry since 1998 and was a science reporter before that, here delves into a wide range of technology trends and offers hands-on tests. His particular interests include Web browsers, cameras, standards, research, science, and start-ups.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Deep Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right