Canon 7D photos can show traces of earlier shot
Canon has warned that traces of one photograph taken with the company's new higher-end EOS 7D SLR can sometimes be seen in the next.
Canon's EOS 7D
(Credit: Canon USA)The good news: new software for the camera should be able to fix the problem at some point. "Canon is currently investigating and analyzing the cause of this phenomenon, and we are planning to release a firmware update to address this issue," the company said in a a service notice.
The problem occurs only when shooting continuously, Canon said: "In images captured by continuous shooting, and under certain conditions, barely noticeable traces of the immediately preceding frame may be visible. This phenomenon is not noticeable in an image with optimal exposure. The phenomenon may become more noticeable if a retouching process such as level compensation is applied to emphasize the image."
The Canon 7D, which just arrived on the market, costs about $1,700 and can shoot 18-megapixel images at speeds of up to eight frames per second.
(Via Cameratown)
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 





I think Canon (and consequently, their customer base) would greatly benefit from less new model releases every year and more support on their existing products. Once you lose a customer to a bad product, its pretty hard to get them back and very costly if you do!
- by Australian_Photographer October 29, 2009 2:14 AM PDT
- Canon has too many models, none of which have the refinement they used to have and all give a bit of a mixed message. You now have two entry level, at least 3 mid range and 2 high end models. All I see is customers becoming more and more confused by it. 50D vs 7D vs 5D?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(8 Comments)