GeoEye gives look at Iranian nuclear site
Satellite imagery company GeoEye has released a photo of what it says is the controversial and underground Iranian uranium enrichment site that came to light last week.
The photo, taken Saturday, shows the facility at a military site about 20 miles north-northeast of Qum and 100 miles southwest of Tehran, GeoEye said. An analysis of the photo by IHS Jane's, a defense intelligence consulting firm, said the facility has a primary and several auxiliary entrances, ventilation shafts, a surface-to-air missile site, and quarry and construction equipment.
See the shots below for a view of what the companies say are the main and auxiliary entrances, the ventilation shafts, and an overall view.
The overall view of the Iranian site. The mountain under which the site is built is to the lower right of the image.
(Credit: GeoEye satellite image/IHS Jane's analysis)
This view shows what IHS Jane's says are ventilation shafts and a possible auxiliary exit from the nuclear site.
(Credit: GeoEye satellite image/IHS Jane's analysis)The International Atomic Energy Agency said it received a letter Monday disclosing the facility, and on Friday Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said it was for uranium enrichment and was 18 months away from being operational.
Centrifuges can separate different isotopes of uranium to produced "enriched" uranium needed to make nuclear weapons; Iran said it's only enriching uranium for purposes of generating electricity. U.S. intelligence agencies said the newly revealed facility is designed to house 3,000 centrifuges, according to the New York Times and others.
The GeoEye-1 satellite took the photo while traveling north 423 miles above the Earth at 4 miles per second relative to the surface of the Earth. The satellite also supplies imagery for Google Maps and Google Earth.
At lower left in this shot is the main entrance to the facility; near it and to the upper right are two auxiliary access areas, according to an interpretation of the photo by IHS Jane's.
(Credit: GeoEye satellite image/IHS Jane's analysis)
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 





Didn't Saddam want the Iranians to think he had weapons of mass construction so they would think twice about attacking?
We have permanent bases in Iraq, confirmed by friends of mine. We are waiting to link all the oil fields together, confirmed for more friends of mine. Yeah its just not that they have uranium enrichment its because they are in the road of a progression pipeline. As far as the disinformation trail goes anyone who trust the media to not help along whatever the government wants is just another "sheeple".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Incident
There is more do some learning.
Rumsfeld is the same as that Nun who sprayed the swastika on her church to bring the community together.
The people in our govt who planned this were all smoking crack.
I wonder what would have happened if the US did a pre-emptive strike on the Soviet Union back in the 50s for developing nuclear weapons. Oh that right, back then it was ok.
Seems like the US just wants another excuse to invade yet again another country to steal its oil. Maybe this time the US won't just guard the oil ministry so it doesn't seem to obvious.
Maybe the USA and Russia should both reduce their weapon systems by simply delivering five mobile launchers plus missiles to each country in the world that does not have them yet.
Iran doesnt have to prove a negative. They are well entitled to build and nuclear processing or reprocessing facility as long as they declare the facility to the IAEA 6 months before they introduce fisile material into the plant.
The Iranians are a good member of the IAEA that have met all their legal obligations under NPT contrary to what our lying politicians and our corporate media say about them.
If we want to have any credibility we have to stop these stupid games we play and understand that the 3rd world / developing world is well aware of our duplicitous schemes and policies and they are onto us. Time for us to stop all the lies and bullying and start following the same rules as we seem so adamant that others adhere to.
On the other hand, we have successive Israeli governments armed with something in excess of 200 nuclear bombs, who are also not really being famous for keeping cool heads. And what makes it worse, is the Israeli blatantly, greedy land grab for their neighbors lands.
I wonder, if in the interest of peace for the rest of the world, it maybe desirable between the 2 sides to have something like a balance.
Of course, the ideal solution would be, that none of the 2 factions have the bomb. But that's never gonna happen, is it?
Arthur
I do believe that America's close and needless ties with Israel are becoming a nuisance, they are on the OTHER side of the Atlantic, They should be forming ties with Europe not America and with the other countries in the region, why should we be wasting wealth and be sending our troops into Global situations that do not necessarily involve us, we have sometimes been the root cause of some of these tensions in the World, we are not an empire it is time we stopped acting like one.
Thanks for photos.
[CNET editors' note: Promotional link deleted]
- by jmoran September 30, 2009 5:36 PM PDT
- This is Israel's immediate problem. They're threatened almost daily by the regime in Iran and I for one think that Iran will not produce a bomb. Israel will see to that. Case closed.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(30 Comments)