Chrome extensions arriving in developer version
Support for extensions to customize Chrome, the top-requested feature for Google's browser, has begun arriving for adventurous users.
Previously, extensions worked only for those who enabled the feature with a command line switch. Now the feature is enabled by default in the developer preview version of Chrome on Windows, Aaron Boodman, the Google engineer who oversees the extensions work, said in a blog post Wednesday.
"We're ready for a few more people to start using extensions--the kind of adventurous people who populate the dev channel," said Boodman, who earlier in his career developed the Greasemonkey tool that permitted extensive customization of Firefox.
Work is already under way for some popular extensions, including Yahoo's Delicious for social bookmarking and Xmarks for bookmark synchronization.
Extensions are enabled by default only for Chrome's Windows users right now. "We've also enlisted some help to get extensions up to speed on Mac and Linux," Boodman said.
The extension-programming interfaces have been changing, and more changes are coming to the user interface. Those who want to start developing extensions should look at the new Chrome extension documentation.
Chrome extensions are written with the same programming technologies as are used for Web pages themselves--HTML, CSS, and the like. Mozilla has a related extension effort called Jetpack under way for Firefox.
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 






who cares about that crap. I need adblock and Noscript support then I'll use Chrome again.
It's like some idiot holding a gun to his head screaming "I'll shoot!". No one cares.
Actually a lot of people care and are saying the same thing, usually in regards to noscript and adblock. You are probably more of the exception. I already switched but the adds are making me reconsider. I had almost forgot that websites used fullscreen ads that you had to close until I switched to Chrome. Content owners just don't have any self control when it comes to ads. That being said there is also nothing about Chrome that makes it a must have for me above FF. It's really only a few small things. Things really aren't as dramatic as you make them sound.
They think that the Web could be better if their were no ads.
Ha ha. Get real. The money has to come from somewhere to support all those great web sites.
Saying I won't use Chrome because there is no Ad blocker is hardly going to make real world people want to cater for your free ride. Real companies are not interested in your opinion. Wake up. No one cares, as the above comment says.
roboform
adBlock
Google Bookmark sync.
that's all! I'll kill IE8 and Firefox
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10311748-92.html
You have really hurt my feelings.
How can we make you switch?
Thats why i don't use any adblock - Chrome doesn't display pop'us - which is all i need !
Adblocks should block only really offensive ads and don't block others -it's main income for developers/websites community
For that reason I still want my AdBlock.
http://download.cnet.com/SRWare-Iron/3000-2356_4-10889248.html?tag=mncol
go to their forums to enable the adblock.
* Advanced URL Builder
* All-in-One Sidebar
* Auto Context
* decaps
* FirefoxView
* Flagfox
* Flashblock
* Hyperwords
* IE View
* jango Toolbar
* Menu Editor II testen
* Menu Mod
* Micro Menu
* More Tools Menu
* Mouse Gestures Redox
* No Color
* Open in IE
* Options Menu
* Parent Folder
* Personal Menu
* Random Page (Firefox 3.0 or later)
* Search Cloudlet
* Site Launcher
* SmarterFox
* Tab Mix Plus
* termBlaster with Firefox
* Unhide Menubar
* Update Notifier
* UrlbarExt
- by rseek October 12, 2009 8:08 PM PDT
- Waiting for Adblock. BUT, how can i expect Google to allow that?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(22 Comments)