November 12, 2009 12:58 PM PST

Google's SPDY protocol could ramp up Web speeds

by Tom Krazit
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 15 comments

As part of its continual push to speed up the Web, Google is taking a look at one of the most basic connections: the conversation between Web servers and browsers.

Google is working on an experimental Web protocol that could make Chrome much faster.

(Credit: Google)

For almost forever, HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) has been the standard that allows Web servers and computer browsers to understand each other, transforming the bits and bytes served up from a Web publisher into a Web page in your browser. But Google announced Thursday that it's working on project called SPDY (pronounced, of course, "speedy") that it feels could make everything faster than HTTP currently allows.

"We want to continue building on the Web's tradition of experimentation and optimization to further support the evolution of websites and browsers. So over the last few months, a few of us here at Google have been experimenting with new ways for Web browsers and servers to speak to each other, resulting in a prototype Web server and Google Chrome client with SPDY support," wrote Mike Belshe and Roberto Peon, software engineers at Google, in a blog post.

In lab conditions unlikely to be duplicated in the real world, Google said SPDY allowed Web pages to load up to 55 percent faster on some of the Internet's biggest sites. "There is still a lot of work we need to do to evaluate the performance of SPDY in real-world conditions. However, we believe that we have reached the stage where our small team could benefit from the active participation, feedback and assistance of the Web community," Belshe and Peon wrote in their blog post.

Techcrunch clarified with Google that it is not planning to advocate one day flipping a switch and moving from HTTP to SPDY, but rather has a more gradual plan in mind where SPDY plays a role in addition to HTTP. One interesting development to watch will be whether Google plans to keep this as a Chrome-only enhancement, or whether it plans to advocate it as a Web standard within the browser community.

Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom.
Recent posts from Relevant Results
DDoS attack hobbles major sites, including Amazon
Web staggers under pre-Christmas DDoS attack
Twitter buys developers of GeoAPI
FTC asks for more info on Google-AdMob deal
Yahoo shutting down for the holidays
Google's creed: 'Open will win'
Why Google may want Yelp
Google's top antitrust defender: 'It's fun'
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by FF2009 November 12, 2009 1:33 PM PST
I don't know what Google is up too but I like it.

They been on a roll this couple weeks. Looks like they want to reinvent the Internet as we know it. lol
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 November 12, 2009 4:41 PM PST
Hey, that isn't such a bad idea, as long as there are not 'monitoring things' in these protocols. That's a deal breaker for me.
by zyxxy November 13, 2009 6:48 AM PST
And as long as the protocol is published to the world as a standard. A proprietary protocol from Google would bother me as much as a proprietary protocol from Apple or Microsoft.
by moordrake November 12, 2009 1:35 PM PST
But, is it secure ?
Reply to this comment
by lezmaka November 12, 2009 3:14 PM PST
Probably not, since it was just created. But HTTP isn't secure either. There's HTTPS, but that is just HTTP running on top of something like SSL.
by zyxxy November 13, 2009 6:49 AM PST
And SSL is now known to be vulnerable to attack.
by pkasting November 12, 2009 1:41 PM PST
How could Google keep this "Chrome-only" when it's fully open-source? And why would it be in their best interests to do so when Google makes money not from Chrome, but from advertising, which presumably people would see more of if web page loaded faster?
Reply to this comment
by DBdweeb November 12, 2009 1:48 PM PST
SPDY might be "speedy" but I thought "spidey" was also apropos.

Arachnophobic.
Reply to this comment
by Guido11450 November 12, 2009 7:10 PM PST
That was my first impression, too. I just read it as spidey when I was reading the heading.
by sfotoord November 12, 2009 2:52 PM PST
While Google has brought a ton of great innovation to the internet, it seems to be a pattern that they like to invent and then share a standard or open source later. It all comes off as very community friendly, but has a creepy undertone to it at the same time.
Reply to this comment
by rtuinenburg November 12, 2009 7:05 PM PST
As long as most of us keep drinking the Googaide, they will continue to supply it.
Reply to this comment
by man_in_la2000 November 12, 2009 10:45 PM PST
at least better than microaid
Reply to this comment
by November 13, 2009 9:13 AM PST
sounds a lot like the BEEP protocol to me.
Reply to this comment
by Chasingu November 14, 2009 9:19 AM PST
This sounds good, anyone know when there going to implement this into Chrome 3 and 4 Beta, which is what I use.
Reply to this comment
by XCMeathead November 14, 2009 1:49 PM PST
Shouldn't be Chrome only because firstly chrome is open source, and secondly Google benefit directly from making the whole of the web better, so it's be in their interests to make SPDY an open protocol too
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Relevant Results

Relevant Results focuses on the big Internet companies of our time, tracking the evolution of search, communication, and business on the Web. Tom Krazit examines how a shift to mobile computing and the growing demand for online content affect our understanding of how to deliver information in the 21st century, in between bemoaning the state of the New York Mets and searching for the perfect IPA.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Relevant Results topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right