October 7, 2009 12:18 PM PDT

Report: Dell to launch Android phone with AT&T

by Tom Krazit
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 29 comments

Updated 1:42 p.m. PDT with background details.

Dell and AT&T plan to launch a smartphone running Google's Android next year, according to a report, as Dell's years-long flirtation with the mobile industry appears ready for the next step.

The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that Dell's smartphone will run Android, which would be another design win to emerge this year for Google's mobile operating system. AT&T's involvement would also mark the fourth major U.S. carrier with plans to support Android, and is particularly interesting given AT&T's status as the exclusive carrier of Apple's iPhone.

Rumors of Dell's involvement with smartphones date back years, but the Wall Street Journal has had a pretty steady stream of stories this year about Dell's evolving plans for the market. In August, Dell showed off in China what it called a "proof of concept" device with no keypad and a touchscreen. That matches the AT&T phone described in the report, but the report also said the expected phone would be somewhat different.

Dell and Google declined to comment on the report.

It's shaping up to be quite a year for Android, after a slow start. Google unveiled the project in the fall of 2007, with the first Android phone arriving late in 2008. But since then, nine phones have launched using the operating system, not counting the two unnamed phones destined for Verizon's network announced Tuesday by Verizon and Google.

It's rapidly becoming the operating system of choice for phone makers who don't want to follow Apple and Research in Motion's strategy of designing the entire device themselves. Wednesday's report arrived as Windows Mobile 6.5 phones were being shown off to lackluster reviews at the CTIA conference, and with a bigger overhaul for Windows Mobile not expected until next year, phone makers are turning to Android.

Motorola, HTC, and Samsung have all come out with Android handsets, and even Nokia has been rumored to be considering Android for either smartphones or Netbooks. Dell, of course, is not a phone maker. The company's involvement in the mobile computing has been on ice ever since it killed its Axim personal digital assistant in 2007, although this year it has dropped steady hints that it wants to get in on one of the fastest growing markets in the technology industry at the moment.

The potential problem for Dell will be one of differentiation, since relatively similar Android phones will all be hitting the market within several months of each other on multiple carriers. Motorola chose to layer a custom user interface over Android called Motoblur in hopes of attracting phone buyers, and it has not been clear from any of the reports whether Dell has made similar investments in software.

Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom.
Recent posts from Relevant Results
DDoS attack hobbles major sites, including Amazon
Web staggers under pre-Christmas DDoS attack
Twitter buys developers of GeoAPI
FTC asks for more info on Google-AdMob deal
Yahoo shutting down for the holidays
Google's creed: 'Open will win'
Why Google may want Yelp
Google's top antitrust defender: 'It's fun'
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (29 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by forever4now October 7, 2009 12:45 PM PDT
Dell's Android smartphone is actually quite attractive. I'm surprised Verizon didn't scoop it up.

It will be interesting to see how AT&T positions it, with the iPhone still its current cash cow.
Reply to this comment
by charlotteguy October 7, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING IN THE WORLD. WHY AT&T? AND WHY DELL? Dell needs to stick to computers and AT&T needs to stick to screwing their customers and offering the dumbest device in the world - - iphone.
Reply to this comment
by therobot October 7, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
how is the Iphone a dumb device? Elaborate
by ausernamenoonehaschosen October 7, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
Don't feed trolls therobot.
by Jonas5454 December 5, 2009 6:35 AM PST
Really guy are u listening to yourself ha iPhone is a great device android is also great but the iPhone is way more user friendly.. And really Att screwing over there customers there the only cell phone company who's ever gonna help u out on ur bill because all there call centers are in the US so no verizon India, or tmobile Europe and Att also has the most advance network dude so look it up and learn somthing man.
by dumbestcrayon December 8, 2009 8:07 AM PST
I wouldn't call it the dumbest device. I would say that Android is so much better because it is more user friendly. The iPhone is more user friendly for the type of people who don't care about customization. The iPhone can be jailbroken but its like being administrator on a Windows PC, you still don't have complete control. With Android you get Root access and COMPLETE control over your phone. (this is what comes with Linux based operating systems).

As far as AT&T goes, I'm not sure what experience you have had with them but their a great company. I don't know what Jonas5454 is talking about but T-Mobile helped me out a lot with my bill, the only reason I'm leaving them for AT&T is because AT&T has a stronger network. And "...because all there call centers are in the US..." is a false statement. I work for AT&T in the Corporate office and I can assure you that there are call centers in Manila, PH and many other places. If you don't believe me I'll show you a screenshot of the database.

AT&T has a stronger network for sure. I live in Dallas, Texas (Max 3G signal) and I get full bars of 3G maybe 10% of the time (as do all of my friends and coworkers who have T-Mobile) Where I can stand next to some friends with AT&T and they have full bars 80-90% of the time. With full bars of T-Mobile a speedtest in Dallas gives about 800-900k. Where AT&T gives about 1700k.
by 38654ob October 7, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
To me, the more carriers that adopt Android the better. It's a great platform, will be nearly universal by the end of this year and is expanding and improving at an astounding rate.

I've been hoping AT&T would bring on Android, the iPhone has has its day and time to move forward.
Reply to this comment
by mpitogo October 7, 2009 1:14 PM PDT
Interesting to see how one of Microsoft's biggest technology partners decides to choose Android over WinMo6.5/7.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 7, 2009 7:00 PM PDT
I agree...it`s because MSFT was asleep at the wheel , or just didn`t have the resources available to get WinMo7 out on time.
by Dan7637 October 7, 2009 1:34 PM PDT
yeah i would like to see more android phones besides the ugly G1 and the mytouch
Reply to this comment
by codynews October 7, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
Ack, why would anyone want to go with AT&T *unless* you're going there specifically for an iphone. To have a company release a phone on AT&T only seems odd to me.

Seriously, who actually uses AT&T that doesn't have an iphone?
Reply to this comment
by jpoirier587 October 7, 2009 5:09 PM PDT
its the second largest provider in the u.s., so a lot of people.... elitist *******
by krazytrixxxsta November 7, 2009 2:03 PM PST
old people, and others who dont know better
by jtjt145 October 7, 2009 2:19 PM PDT
A breath of fresh air ...
At last we see some loosening between the otherwise nose-ringed hardware makers from the crushing (blackmail) pressure from Micro$oft to preload Windows onto everything that has a circuit board.

I hope the trend will lead on to PCs, so users, at last, have a free choice of what operating system they get on their new PC without having to fork out the $100 or more Micro$oft tax for the unwanted Windows licenses!

Arthur
Reply to this comment
by Sausagebiscuit October 7, 2009 2:24 PM PDT
I wish makers would focus on the hardware and not adding crap on top of the software like Motorola is doing. Most of the time, the 'added value" sucks and is removed. Android is fine as it is. Ship it plain and let the user do the customization. Focus on your hardware. Thanks.
Reply to this comment
by Alex3581 October 7, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
An Android phone on AT&T network, seeing is believing since they scraped at least one so far, HTC Lancaster.
Reply to this comment
by ferricoxide October 7, 2009 2:32 PM PDT
The Android phones make the most sense as "data-only" devices. Frankly, any of the 3G or better phones make more sense as "data-only" devices. Too bad it's unlikely that the wireless companies will try to hobble those phones (as they've been doing) so as to preserve their voice and SMS businesses.
Reply to this comment
by steel36 October 7, 2009 5:24 PM PDT
When? Oh, next year. As in, last. Way to go, AT&T.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 7, 2009 6:33 PM PDT
The Android Avalanche has started. This is great.
Nice not knowing you iPhone. Hello Google Voice !
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 7, 2009 7:17 PM PDT
Three more days and HTC Hero will be here ; )
Reply to this comment
by atish505 October 8, 2009 1:39 AM PDT
HTC Hero is coolest gadget of the year 2009. Way to go.
Reply to this comment
by shoonya October 8, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
"Wednesday's report arrived as Windows Mobile 6.5 phones were being shown off to lackluster reviews at the CTIA conference" - Link does not talk about any thinabout lack luster. Tom it seems you are getting load of money from Google for being the mouth piece.
Reply to this comment
by gsmiller88 October 14, 2009 11:50 AM PDT
As I've said many times before, if these companies want to take on the iPhone (let's face it, that's what they're all focused on) then they needn't sign exclusive contracts with AT&T. They need to take advantage at the other half of the country that uses CDMA carriers who refuse to switch.
Reply to this comment
by dan90254 October 31, 2009 2:01 AM PDT
Want to know the problem with Android, just look at Microsoft. Same philosophy. Don't worry about who makes the hardware, just focus on open-ended software. Well, what you get is some hardware that is good and some that isn't. Overtime, the hardware that isn't starts to reflect on your software product. Don't get me wrong, I love GOOGLE and think they are great at software. But the APPLE approach is better. True control over both hardware and software, that's why there IS NO competition and never will be between Androids and iPhones. This is why over time, you will see APPLE dominate the PC market. People want things that work and without the confusion of knowing which Android phone should I get, Motorolo, HTC, Samsung, Dell? Shoot, I don't know... do you?
Reply to this comment
by debroq November 9, 2009 10:26 AM PST
dan90254 - We've been waiting 30 something years for Apple to dominate the PC market. When did you say this is going to happen?
by krazytrixxxsta November 7, 2009 2:01 PM PST
dell trying to make up all they revenues they lost, from being the #1 world computers provider and now to being #3. they might want to rethink that whole att idea.
Reply to this comment
by BlazeEagle November 23, 2009 1:01 AM PST
I don't care what market position a product has, I just care about quality & reliability. I also tire of the arrogance of Apple & many of Apple's users.
by krazytrixxxsta November 7, 2009 2:02 PM PST
dell trying to make up all they revenues they lost, from being the #1 world computers provider and now to being #3. they might want to rethink that whole att idea.
Reply to this comment
by BlazeEagle November 23, 2009 12:53 AM PST
I like the DELL computer I currently have & if if they handle this right, their phone could be a good device.
Reply to this comment
(29 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Relevant Results

Relevant Results focuses on the big Internet companies of our time, tracking the evolution of search, communication, and business on the Web. Tom Krazit examines how a shift to mobile computing and the growing demand for online content affect our understanding of how to deliver information in the 21st century, in between bemoaning the state of the New York Mets and searching for the perfect IPA.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Relevant Results topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right