Bing strikes licensing deal with Wolfram Alpha
Bing will start using Wolfram Alpha's data in search results following a licensing deal.
(Credit: Screenshot by Tom Krazit/CNET)Microsoft's Bing search engine is getting a little help from a very smart friend.
Wolfram Alpha and Bing have reached a licensing deal that allows Bing to present some of the specialized scientific and computational content that Wolfram Alpha generates, according to a source familiar with the deal. The deal was reported earlier by TechCrunch.
Representatives from Microsoft and Wolfram Research declined to comment on the deal.
Wolfram Alpha's unique blend of computational input and curated output hasn't taken the world by storm, but it is considered an interesting enough take on the business of Internet search to attract high-profile attention within the industry. Wolfram Alpha doesn't return the usual list of links to pages with search keywords, instead providing answers to questions such as stock prices and complex mathematical formulas--with mixed results.
Bing, on the other hand, is enjoying a solid start in the three months since it made its debut as it gains users and will at some point be the default search experience on Yahoo's highly trafficked pages following a long-awaited deal. It's not clear whether Bing results will carry Wolfram's branding (i.e., results "Powered By Wolfram Alpha"), but there will be some sort of presence.
It's unlikely that Bing is going to turn over the bulk of its results to Alpha, however. In a blog post Friday, Wolfram founder Stephen Wolfram admitted that linguistic problems are to blame for half of the occasions when Wolfram Alpha doesn't return a result. That percentage is changing as Wolfram refines the science behind Wolfram Alpha, but it will take some time.
Corrected at 3:30 p.m. PDT to clarify that half the time Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand an input query, it's due to linguistic problems. An earlier version suggested that Wolfram Alpha didn't understand queries half the time.
Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom. 





If they just park a portal in there, then nah - it'll be useless (most of academia already goes straight to the source now). OTOH, if they use it to actually make a real "decision engine" (not just a fancy search mask), then they could actually gain some ground with it...
It's a neat idea, but until they implement it, this is just plain marketing IMHO.
I know someone who liked Bing for about a month. That was 3 months ago. She's back on Google.
Her reason? It searched weird.
I think it is similar.
http://www.google.com/squared
I've not seen anything from google like that. Google can do conversions if you know what to ask for:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=3GB+%3D+%3F+MB
But, W.A. can do this: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=3+GB+to+MB
This is really different and more informative.
I doubt W.A. is going to give away the store, no?
I'm sure W.A will get a hefty source of revenue from this.
As for the filthy diseased prostitute formerly known as MSN Search, I have far to much self respect to step foot into that heroin den. M$ can poison and stack their search results until the cows come home, but those of us with a brain recognize all that lipstick as nothing more than a covering for a disgusting pig that was rejected by virtually everyone nearly a decade ago.
Bing is not a tool for academics and researchers.
Mixing them will lead to yawning from all corners.
- by PulSamsara August 25, 2009 12:26 PM PDT
- bing... lol
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(24 Comments)