November 10, 2009 4:09 PM PST

New York hospital revives ailing computer network

by Elizabeth Armstrong Moore
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

Desktop virtualization is saving St. Vincent's both electric and staff energy.

(Credit: Pano Logic)

It's no secret that the installed base of technology at large medical facilities needs refreshing, especially as hospitals work toward digitizing medical records.

At St. Vincent's Catholic Medical Center in New York, a nonprofit with 42 facilities across five boroughs, the constant accessing and updating of patient records through the hospital's shared-bandwidth MPLS network resulted in unacceptable lag time pretty much all day, every day.

So Kane Edupuganti, director of IT Operations & Communications, convinced the higher-ups to retire the hospitals' hundreds of five-plus-year-old desktops and buy more than 600 zero client cubes from Pano Logic.

"About six months ago we did the proof of concept and rolled out our first batch in three weeks," Edupuganti says. "That's how easy it was. Right now we are at 300 and change, and we'll be at 640 by the end of the year."

By opting for virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), St. Vincent's went from being bogged down on the MPLS network to running applications and the desktop in the data center, with screen scrapes done to an endpoint device.

The Pano Device uses less than 3 percent the energy of even EnergyStar desktop PCs.

(Credit: Pano Logic)

Edupuganti has placed his faith in Pano Logic because the stateless, tiny Pano Device (3 inches by 3 inches by 2 inches) "simply serves to connect peripheral devices--a keyboard, mouse, VGA display, and audio output--along with other USB peripherals, to a virtualized Microsoft Windows desktop operating system running on a server in the data center."

No OS, no CPU, no memory, no fan, no moving parts at all. As Edupuganti puts it, the devices are essentially just screensharing, using VMware ESX in the background to spin up the hospitals' virtual desktops. If a nurse was in the middle of updating a record and is interrupted (not uncommon in a hospital setting), the nurse could finish updating via an entirely different cube in a distant unit.

Beyond the obvious savings in staff time, from the perspective of not only medical personnel but the center's eight engineers who serve 7,000 people, Edupuganti is already seeing enormous energy savings, with each cube using less than 3 percent of even EnergyStar PCs: "Regular fat PCs suck up 140 to 160 watts; Pano Logic uses 5. Multiply that times 500 units. It's huge."

And it needs to be. In its existence BP (Before Pano), St. Vincent's was purportedly one of New York State's top five power hogs. The significant reduction in energy costs is not only good for the environment, but a key factor in justifying the cost of the Pano devices.

Of course, the cubes are only as good as the network, whose occasional blips result in blank screens on the user's end that a simple restart does not fix, and can be a nuisance when the entire IT department is sleeping soundly at home. But that's a small price to pay, compared to the fat client problems that came before.

Elizabeth Armstrong Moore is a freelance journalist based in Portland, Ore. She has contributed to Wired magazine, The Christian Science Monitor, and public radio. Her semi-obscure hobbies include unicycling, slacklining, hula-hooping, scuba diving, billiards, Sudoku, Magic the Gathering, and classical piano. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
advertisement
 
Remove up to 2x more plaque* with an Oral-B electric toothbrush.
*Oral-B ProfessionalCare series vs. a regular manual toothbrush
Recent posts from Health Tech
What women who play Everquest II really want
Does MIT's Copenhagen Wheel go the distance?
Cell phone activity helps predict spread of malaria
Can we diagnose and destroy cancer in one sitting?
Radiologists rally behind imaging app OsiriX
Microsoft to buy Sentillion for health care software
Obama directs $600 million to health centers
Third-person shooter improves science skills
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ObsceneZen November 10, 2009 4:57 PM PST
Wow, this is a major paradigm shift. This concept could apply to a nearly limitless number of settings, such as corporate offices, warehouses, etc. I could potentially see this as one of the major developments that reshapes the future of workplace computing.
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss November 10, 2009 5:28 PM PST
how is this different from any other thin client?
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok November 10, 2009 8:49 PM PST
It's not. Pretty funny how people discover thin clients every so often. The obvious drawback is now you need extremely high end machines in the data center to host a few hundred end users, and all the users have the same spec machine, from the secretary to the surgeon. Thin client computing is fine so long as client applications aren't sophisticated. Imagine having a dozen users running some CAD software - a $500 desktop will run it competently - would a $6000 server? Almost certainly not.
by DLoof November 11, 2009 1:02 PM PST
The Pano System is completely different than thin clients, in that it is a complete end-to-end solution (endppoint, broker/connector and backend management), purpose-built for VDI, versus thin or chubby clients that are retrofitted terminal services technology, requiring additional devices (adding vendors and $) to complete the solution and requiring processing power at the end point (adding management time and upkeep). What we've done is basically stretch the BUS such that the Windows VM thinks the Pano Device is local, and therefore treats the Pano Device as if it is on the same machine. That's why the Pano Device doesn't need anything but a connection to the peripherals and brains on top of the hypervisor. Hence, zero client.
by Remo_Williams November 11, 2009 6:36 AM PST
No no no no no... 5 watts total? Really? These devices are hooked up to displays, mice, keyboards. What's the total wattage used by all devices, and don't say "5" because no one has a 5 watt LCD monitor on the desk.
Reply to this comment
by DLoof November 11, 2009 1:05 PM PST
Yes 5 watts at the endpoint. So, compared to a PC, the Pano Devices conserve about 97% less energy. You are right though, together with the servers, peripherals,etc... it works out to be 85 - 95% compared to PC equivalents. Not too shabby!
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Behind the scenes: NORAD's Santa tracker

For decades, the defense group has let you follow the Christmas Eve travels of the jolly old elf. These days, technology is playing a bigger role than ever.

Intel redesigns Atom chip for Netbooks

The chipmaker officially announces the next generation of its popular Atom CPUs for Netbooks, the N450, weeks before the CES trade show.

advertisement

About Health Tech

From advancements in electronic health records to cutting-edge surgical tools, CNET covers the medical-technology news buzzing through operating and waiting rooms.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right