• On mySimon: KitchenAid Professional Stand Mixer
September 22, 2009 12:25 PM PDT

Superhuman vision may be on the horizon

by Elizabeth Armstrong Moore
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 20 comments

Engineers are developing contact lenses with an imprinted electronic circuit and lights.

(Credit: University of Washington)

Contact lenses have traditionally been engineered to help the visually impaired see the world around them more clearly--to attain perfect, or close to perfect, vision.

But why not super vision? Why not a lens that could superimpose holographic driving control panels over a pilot's otherwise normal view? Enable Web surfing on the go? Provide a virtual world for gamers that covers their entire field of vision instead of just a plasma screen?

Engineers at the University of Washington have been asking just that as they manufacture first-gen versions of the bionic eye in the form of contact lenses with an imprinted electronic circuit and lights.

"Conventional contact lenses are polymers formed in specific shapes to correct faulty vision," writes Babak A. Parviz, an associate professor at UW who heads a multi-disciplinary group on electronics in contact lenses, in the September 2009 issue of IEEE's Spectrum. "To turn such a lens into a functional system, we integrate control circuits, communication circuits, and miniature antennas into the lens using custom-built optoelectronic components. Those components will eventually include hundreds of LEDs, which will form images in front of the eye, such as words, charts, and photographs."

A separate device will probably relay information to the lens's control circuit, which will operate the optoelectronics in the lens. Even so, Parviz argues that these lenses don't need to be terribly complex to be useful:

Even a lens with a single pixel could aid people with impaired hearing or be incorporated as an indicator into computer games. With more colors and resolution, the repertoire could be expanded to include displaying text, translating speech into captions in real time, or offering visual cues from a navigation system. With basic image processing and Internet access, a contact lens display could unlock whole new worlds of visual information, unfettered by the constraints of a physical display.

In trials, rabbits wore lenses with metal circuitry for 20-minute intervals without adverse effect.

(Credit: University of Washington)

Parviz's team still has to overcome several obstacles. For instance, the lens' key components need to be reduced in size and integrated onto about 1.5 square centimeters of polymer. The engineers haven't been able to do this yet, but they have devised a "specialized assembly process" by which they integrate several different components onto a lens.

Another issue is safety. Red LEDs typically are made of toxic aluminum gallium arsenide. To make a lens safe, the toxins must be thoroughly enveloped in a biocompatible substance, which must never bleed.

So far, Parviz writes, "We've fabricated prototype lenses with an LED, a small radio chip, and an antenna, and we've transmitted energy to the lens wirelessly, lighting the LED." They then encapsulated the lenses in a biocompatible polymer and tested them on rabbits with no noticeable adverse effect, although the rabbits only wore the lenses for 20-minute intervals.

Parviz isn't making any promises on when these lenses will be ready, or how they will initially be used, but he hopes that, as with iPhone apps, there will be countless input points from developers and tinkerers around the world.

The eyes may soon be the window to not only someone's soul, but his circuitry, too.

Elizabeth Armstrong Moore is a freelance journalist based in Portland, Ore. She has contributed to Wired magazine, The Christian Science Monitor, and public radio. Her semi-obscure hobbies include unicycling, slacklining, hula-hooping, scuba diving, billiards, Sudoku, Magic the Gathering, and classical piano. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
advertisement
 
Remove up to 2x more plaque* with an Oral-B electric toothbrush.
*Oral-B ProfessionalCare series vs. a regular manual toothbrush
Recent posts from Health Tech
Bedside vital signs monitor goes mobile
Germ alert: Attack of the killer necktie!
Philips' Ambient Experience relaxes heart patients
iPhone app scans bar codes for health, enviro ratings
A stethoscope app? Be still my beating heart
IBM chip to speed medical diagnostic testing
A new antidepressant really turns women on
Finding safe toys this holiday season
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Harlan879 September 22, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
This is ridiculous. Two giant, giant problems that I haven't seen addressed. First, any light from an LED that's on your cornea will be impossibly blurry. How do they propose to get the light focused? They'd have to generate coherent light (like a laser) and aim it at just the right spot on the back of your eye. That's totally different from their prototypes. Second, your eye moves constantly, but whatever image you have on your cornea will move along with your eye. Your brain is not designed to make sense of such stimuli, and will probably ignore it after a few seconds. Do the researchers propose to shift the image constantly to counteract eye movements, including micro-saccades? If not, it simply won't work. And doing so will be extremely complicated.

Both of these issues will need to be *completely* addressed to make these lenses even slightly useful.
Reply to this comment
by kewell82 September 22, 2009 12:44 PM PDT
Harlan you need to relax. Everyone knows this is a gimmick and this is the first time you have ever heard of this so relax only time will tell.
by Pishkado September 22, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
The Wright Flyer of 1903 had pretty severe range and payload limitations, too.
by kormiko September 22, 2009 12:51 PM PDT
Yes, these silly scientists should probably just give up on their inventions, huh?
In fact, I think we should all go back to torches and stone tools.

What I want to know is when did Grimace become an Engineer?
by yacahuma September 22, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
whats wrong with glasses?
Reply to this comment
by kormiko September 22, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
They are for nerds and hot librarians. 8^)
by Hellcat September 22, 2009 2:14 PM PDT
I was thinking the same thing. It would be easier to make glasses with this technology than contact lenses. Glasses are thicker, they have more real-estate and you don't have to worry about having them on your eyes with the fear of them bleeding toxic chemicals, you don't have to worry about blurriness or eye movement. It gets rid of most of the cons of this. If at some point they actually come out with a safe LED contact lens then they can bring that out at a higher price and glasses will become geeky again.

kormiko yes glasses are for nerds and hot librarians, but if they came out with glasses that did this everyone nerd and not would buy them...these would make glasses cool.
by kormiko September 22, 2009 3:49 PM PDT
Of course, I was making a funny for people.
I wear glasses, actually.
I'm not a librarian, and I'm not smart enough for nerd status.

I've read about these contacts a few weeks ago. However, they are working on glasses that can do this same thing and will probably come out a lot sooner than these contact lenses. Many people won't feel comfortable wearing contact lenses anyway, so there will be an option.

It will go as follows, augmented computer phones (which we have now), then wearable monitor glasses connected to the computer phones in your pocket, then computers embedded into the glasses themselves, then onto contacts, then put directly into our brains. Fun!!! Can't wait.
by dkosiur September 22, 2009 1:13 PM PDT
Sounds great, but why not focus more attention on how to improve vision for those with failing eyesight?
Reply to this comment
by kormiko September 22, 2009 2:03 PM PDT
That's kinda like saying to the headphone/bluetooth headset makers to come up with better hearing aids.
It would be great, but we can have more than one team of engineers working on different things.
Some teams work better on some projects than others.
There are teams that are improving eyesight now anyway, using stem cells, infra-red treatments, and robotic eyes.
by sandor_f September 22, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
http://tinyurl.com/lgkgmx

there are 356,000 results. and there are only about 150,000 ophthalmologists in the world. but it is just a little more complicated than creating a contact lens-based "heads up" display.
by kormiko September 23, 2009 9:49 PM PDT
.


http://www.physorg.com/news172920565.html


.
by NervClaX September 22, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
I would be terrified of the little white bunnies coming at me with glowing red eyes. They can already multiply like... well... like rabbits. Why should we give them any more evolutionary advantages? How about the prospect of someone hacking your eyesight like in Ghost in the Shell? Serial Experiments Lain?
Reply to this comment
by Argyll September 22, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
I want to see infrared - that would be more helpful than superimposed holograms.
Reply to this comment
by September 22, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
I don't know about this, before you go sticking some potentially threatening device INTO my eye. Show me the benefet in a pair of standard glasses first. Augment those first and prove it works before I let you stick it IN my eye.....

The benefit in doing that first is that the size constraints aren't nearly as impossible.
Reply to this comment
by aj37viggen September 22, 2009 3:10 PM PDT
Nearly every day I have one or two near-death experiences caused by some yutz trying to drive, operate machinery, etc., with an electronic device stuck in his ear. I'm not crazy about the idea of these idiots being distracted by stuff piped into their eyes as well.
Reply to this comment
by catbutt5 September 22, 2009 3:49 PM PDT
By the time they get the tech for this perfected, cars will be driving themselves... complete cruise control.
by LAR Games September 22, 2009 3:32 PM PDT
If superhuman vision is on the horizon, then the horizon is really far away. Isn't it?

-Luis
Reply to this comment
by kormiko September 22, 2009 8:23 PM PDT
I guess that depends on what you mean by "really far away."

Look at the specs of an iPhone 3GS (2009) to the specs of an average iMac (1999). The iPhone is smaller, faster with much more RAM, much more disk space, plus it's a portable phone. Price is hard to compare since you have to deal with phone/data plans for the iPhone and phone/internet plans for the iMac back then, plus whatever configuration you choose for both. But that was only a ten years difference and technology advanced really fast. It doesn't seem like it when you're living through it, but it really does move quickly.

The technology advances of the 2010s are going to go faster than it did in this decade and the 2020s will go even faster than the 2010s. I see these contacts could happen within the next ten years, but definitely by the next twenty. To me, the horizon is not that far away.
by Ancient_Archive September 22, 2009 8:09 PM PDT
I think that what these guys here are doing is excellent. Yeah they might not be able to make these lenses specifically. But it is the push for advancing technology that might be useful in other gizmos of the future. eg they might develop a new LED which doesn't use aluminium gallium arsenide.

The University of Washington have got the right idea.
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

E-tailers linked to 'scam' blame customers

Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

advertisement

About Health Tech

From advancements in electronic health records to cutting-edge surgical tools, CNET covers the medical-technology news buzzing through operating and waiting rooms.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right