AT&T takes the phone out of iPhone
Three weeks ago, I got a call on a friend's iPhone while in the middle of a desert; cell phone coverage had come to Burning Man. By contrast, several calls I made last night to my parents from my San Francisco apartment were dropped and a subsequent connection became garbled.
That happens daily when I try to converse on my first-generation iPhone in my apartment and in certain other neighborhoods. I've come to anticipate that if I can even make a call it's likely to be short-lived or poor quality.
Frustrated by the numerous interrupted calls, I decided to try to find out why my iPhone service is so poor that it's easier to have a Web video conference over AIM with my boyfriend because neither of us can use our iPhones (his is 3G) reliably inside either of our homes.
This is not a new problem. AT&T was criticized when traffic from attendees at the South By Southwest conference in Austin, Texas, overwhelmed the network earlier this year. And there were widespread complaints about dropped calls and spotty service after the launch of the iPhone 3G a year ago.
I wondered why, a year later, the service still seemed unreliable. I called AT&T (on my reliable landline at work) to find out. AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel blamed the problem on the increasing amount of data traffic iPhone users are creating, which CNET News and others wrote about earlier this month.
"We lead the industry in smart phones," he said. "As a result, we are having to stay ahead of what is incredible and increasing demand for wireless data services."
I wanted to know specifically why my problems haven't been resolved nearly one-and-a-half years after getting my iPhone and why my voice reception would be impacted by data traffic on a different network. "Well, it wouldn't," Siegel conceded.
Initially, he had suggested that my problems were related to the fact that the first-generation iPhone uses the EDGE data network, which is slower than the 3G network. However, not only am I on a different data network than the 3G data bandwidth hogs, but there should be no connection between general data usage and my voice reception.
Other factors are at play, though, such as proximity to a cell tower, the thickness of walls in the building and amount of demand on the network at the time, according to Siegel.
Asked what AT&T is doing to address the reception problems, Siegel said the company is rolling out 850 MHz frequency, which penetrates walls better than the higher frequency 1900MHz band; adding 2,000 cell towers to increase coverage; beefing up its back-haul capacity that connects the cell towers to the Internet; spending as much as $18 billion this year to upgrade its wireless and broadband networks; and moving to the LTE, or 4G, network standard next year.
"We recognize unique challenges have been posed by all of these smart devices being increasingly used by more and more people and I think we are on the forefront of architecting our network to continue to stay ahead of the demands that those devices place on our network," he said.
Despite listing the improvements AT&T plans to make, Siegel kept insisting that there was no story here; that my concerns and the many comments on the Apple iPhone forums about reception problems and dropped calls was not newsworthy.
While I do have friends who report no problems with their iPhone reception, many of my friends have complaints. I did an informal survey of friends on Facebook and learned that people suffer from dropped calls, as well as inaccessible voice mail and delayed voice messages. Also, I am not alone in being forced to cut back on talking on the phone as a result of the reception problems. Here are some examples of the responses I got:
"As soon as I move and do not have an ATT bundle, I am throwing the iphone, and ATT in the trash," wrote a San Francisco friend using a first-generation iPhone.
"When i first got my iPhone (July 2007), i had fine coverage. In the past nine months or so, something changed. Now i have *horrible* reception in my neighborhood, especially in my apartment, and most especially in my bedroom. My phone virtually never rings there, and i almost never get voicemails or text messages until somewhere between 2 minutes and 2 hours after the communication went through," wrote another first-generation Bay Area iPhone user on Facebook.
"Terrible in SF. Probably 1 out of 3 calls gets dropped," wrote a 3G iPhone user.
"I've come to use it as a portable computer and a phone only in emergencies. I hardly talk on the phone anymore," another Bay Area friend who has a 3G iPhone told me.
"My (3G iPhone) won't work inside my house. I'm thinking about selling my house and finding a new one. Until then, I just use the forwarding feature, but it's a pain. And yeah, it means I tend to talk on the iPhone less. It's definitely a problem with my line o' work, although I'm trying to use Google Voice to solve the problem, too," wrote a friend in Arizona.
Siegel was not amused.
"So you are actively asking folks to submit their experiences? Sorry, but you and I have a basic disagreement about why you are doing this story. What is the news here beyond what others have covered?" he wrote in an e-mail.
Maybe I should pose that question to all the iPhone users who can't make a basic phone call with their phones much of the time.
Siegel said he would look into my particular situation. I hope he does and if so, I'll let you know what I find out.
While I can't speak for other parts of the country, there do seem to be problems in San Francisco at least. This is significant given the high percentage of iPhone users in the area.
What's your experience?
After receiving hundreds of reader e-mails and comments to this article I decided to do a follow up story. You can read it here.
Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor. 





Then they won't be able to prioritize voice data over myspace videos and calls are sure to...um...wait...
About 1995 I took a picture of my wife's and my own cellphones side by side showing full signal strength. There were four cell sites within sight. Unable to make a call from either phone, so I jumped ship then.
Another question for ATT: Why did the analog phones work so well and the later and better digital work worse?
Try spending some money on hardware and technology instead of advertising and promotion. Get back to service.
josh in Burlingame, CA
At the very same place they were having "reception problems", my Nokia 6820 was getting full bars, no dropped calls, and came in crystal clear.
When I upgraded to the Fuze, in the same area that where Iphone dead zones, I was still getting 3G, full bars, no dropped calls, and the calls came in fine.
You would think with all the techgeeks at CNET, someone there would actually THINK about say doing a comparision on the same network but with a different phone to see if the problem is with either the phone or the network.
But I guess people are so hooked to the Iphone that NO ONE would actually dare ASK and TEST to see if the Jesus Phone might actually have some reception problems. You would think a website dedicated to REVIEWS and TESTS of tech equipment might actually think of that...
I live in LA, where reception is good except for Hollywood, where it's horrible. Edge most of the time, etc.
But this weekend, there was a problem. "Call failed" over and over, with full bars. Connecting to a friend's voicemail without her phone ringing (even though it "rang" 6 times each time).
So this is clearly an AT&T problem, not just an iPhone problem. Given the massive growth their customer base has seen, it's not surprising but it certainly doesn't say much for that company if they couldn't foresee and prepare for that kind of rapid growth thus far.
All the articles farting on att comes from journalists who live in NYC, San Fran and other highly populated and techno populated areas. Duh AT&T you want to stop the bashing fix your network where it counts; overall giving me Fing Google Voice and I'll sign up for AT&T and iPhone. Right now I just use an ipod touch.
Hate all US carriers for protecting their business models and for stifling innovation!
Also, Apple and RIM also told me that they have heard complaints from customers about the quality of the voice side of AT&T's network.
'Course it doesn't help that AT&T never seems to realize that smartphones need bandwidth, bandwidth, and more bandwidth or work.
BTW, Apple and RIM BOTH state that there is NO RELATIONSHIP between general data usage and voice reception. They even recommended that you think about complaining to the FCC, since it sounds like your service does NOT work reliably enough for you to even make an emergency call to 911, as required by Federal regulations and laws.
BTW: It doesn't seem to just be iPhones. I've had three phones on the AT&T network, and suffered dropped calls continuously. Interestingly, with the iPhone it often doesn't even matter how many bars are displayed. It can display full bars but have zero signal!
I rarely get dropped calls, I live in San Diego California.
That being said, I don't think CNET posters are necessarily the best cross section for commenting as they're often biased toward Apple, AT&T or work for said companies as this is a technology website. I take every comment with a grain of salt.
Elinor - your article is very one-sided. While I'm sure there are issues, you simply cannot imply it's a problem with all users. There are several factors that can affect call quality. A few are AT&T problems, others are not. All my friends that own iPhone (different generations) all love their phones and have little or no problems. Most live in the San Francisco / Bay area.
I don't have an iPhone, but I do have an AT&T Fuse which is a 3G smartphone on the same networks as the iPhone. I also live in the Bay Area (Peninsula) I can't get reception inside my house, except when I'm very near a window (House is older, wood, no insulation.) and even then, the calls drop. If I step right outside, the phone will show two or three bars, and I can talk for about 5 or 10 minutes before the call just drops. At work, My signal is generally poor or non-existent. Both places are in a well populated area.
Usually I know someone called me because the voice mail alert beeps at me, usually an hour or more after I originally got the call. Occasionally my phone DOES ring when someone calls, and then about 50% of the time, I answer the call, and it drops immediately after I say hello. (No, my ringer is not off)
I keep my phone locked on EDGE network often now, because it seems to perform slightly better there. (seems like the phone rings, and then drops the call most frequently, but at least I know when someone's trying to get ahold of me.)
Even when I'm showing full signal strength, it seems that the phone is prone to drop calls, or have generally noisy signal (those momentary pops and drop outs that you get...)
By the way, I don't think this is an issue with the phone, I had a different smart phone 8 - 10 months ago, and it had the same problems.
Quite a few people (2-3 thousand) work at my site, and the management just recently sent out a site survey asking everyone who has AT&T to fill out a form that shows where exactly they work on site, how many "bars they show" whether their phone rings when they get calls or not, and what percentage of their calls are dropped. The purpose of the survey was stated as a tool that would help AT&T improve poor coverage at our site. I'm guessing that it actually has more to do with network infrastructure than signal though, It seems to me like a scalability issue more than anything.
Clearly there IS a newsworthy issue with regard to AT&T's performance, and even corporate customers are starting to raise issue with AT&T, and that has guys like Siegel running scared.
You know I'm surprised that they haven't tried limiting usage as a solution like comcast capping monthly transfers.
Its a simple do nothing solution on the part of the provider. They'll force you to reduce your usage and at the same time make more money for themselves.
When my contract is satisfied, goodbye AT&T.
I've been waiting to be "satisfied" myself here in middle Georgia for 16 months. We have no 3G yet and EDGE has only beed reliable for slow data transfers. Voice is OK here, but i still have similar issues with getting voicemail notification 2 hours after I get a "call" that never rings.
Wish ATT was waiting for me to be satisfied instead of me waiting for my contract to be satisfied.
And remember, 3G is third generation data AND voice, not just 3rd generation data. When on 3G, your voice and data go over the same data channel over the air, that is why both are affected.
Never a problem here in the southern Adirondacks of upstate New York. I never have a dropped call, or any
issues at all, even when I make my yearly road trip to southern California. The voice network works fine, clarity, access to the network, etc. I have no axe to grind either way, regarding AT&T. It just seems that you guys are
paying more & getting less. I simply use my phone as a phone. A friend of mine has a nice Blackberry, using the
Sprint network, and when he calls it truly sounds horrible. I think there's a lot to be said about living simply...........
So which excuse are they going with now? Just take the money to fix the damn network away from the shareholer's profit and upper management's bonuses ( We all know they are not EARNING it ! ). Otherwise the consumers will speak with their money and they will lose even more. Look at what happened to Sprint when they acquired Nextel. They had issues supporting 2 networks and had horrendous call quality which equaled in lost customers.
If it was not for the iPhone AT&T would not have the growth numbers it is reporting.
at&t's argument was that because there are so many cell towers in nyc it couldn't possibly be an issue on their end. i've come to see making calls with my iphone as a complete gamble and find myself repeatedly saying "hello?" mid-sentence to see if i am still connected with the other party. there are at least 6 other people i have spoken with here in nyc that are experiencing similar issues. unfortunately, i think the problem will only get worse as the roll out mms and tethering. if at&t wants to keep exclusivity for this device, they need to deliver as a carrier. i'm fairly certain i will break my contract early with at&t when i run up the credit i received from tech support; it just doesn't make sense to pay so much a month for an glorified ipod touch.
also, lately my phone/number/service has reported that i am not accepting any calls when others try to reach me, in addition to the long lag times between text messages and voice messages (if i can access them). there is one other person i've spoken with here in ny that's had a similar "not accepting calls" experience. the comment about calling the fcc is a good option. i do not feel comfortable at allll that i could make even an emergency call if i needed to.
i guess in the end the iphone was revolutionary enough that it actually took down at&t.
It was worth the $175 ETF to not have to pay $85/month for something that I couldn't use 90% of the time.
It's gotten to the point that we've had emergency situations where we have to get in contact with each other and we won't be able to (she has a 3G also). I work for a major cell phone company and, when I first got my 3g, I couldn't WAIT to sell it to everyone else because the phone is genuinely fantastic. But after getting to know and just experiencing these issues myself, I rarely try to "sell" an iPhone with AT&T when it can't sell itself. I miss Verizon and can't wait to go back.
It appears that ALL cellular phone companies need to put some money where their mouths are; quite paying these CEO's HUGH sums to sit around with the "good ole boys, drinking their cocktails and smoking their cigars AND to STOP their bragging about how big and grate THEIR company is and get to work fixing the communication problems of our nation! BTW, AT&T also has big problems in their landline portion of the company. NO DSL here - they tell me I can either use dial-up; or satellite, which cost $79.99/mo versa $24.95 for DSL. REAL NICE AREN'T THEY. Oh yes, I did notify THEIR satellite option, BUT they will not give a written explanation. WONDER WHY?????
My reception is horrible with my 3GS. Half the time I have all bars, and half the time I have no bars. I have WiFi, and I use Skype to make calls when I have no bars. But, receiving calls is a problem unless I go through the hassle of forwarding incoming calls to my Skype number, then back again when the AT&T signal returns.
I switched to the iPhone from a Blackberry on the Verizon network, and I always had good reception. Still, I am extremely fond of my iPhone. I do hope that they switch to Verizon. Their network and particularly their customer service...just outstanding, really, really good.
Apple, please switch to Verizon.
Dropped calls and need-to-reboot is about the same for me on a iPhone 3G as it was on a Motorola k1m from Verizon . . . seems to be population-density related . . .
Guess AT&T isn't going to be spending any money in dead zones any time soon.
- by September 22, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
- No problems with coverage in Ohio. I haven't missed a call yet (knock on wood). Coverage in my house (which has brick walls) has not been a problem even though it shows only 1 bar. No offense meant to Elinor, but I'm starting to get a little tired of listening to all the folks at cnet whining about AT&T's network in San Fran. Yes, it sucks. I get it.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by bigmc6000 September 22, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
- no kidding - you'd think the whole world revolved around San Fran - guess what CNet - it doesn't. Personally (and I think this speaks for most people), I couldn't give two craps about the coverage in San Fran as I've never been there and have no plans to. You can keep your city - I'll keep my cell phone coverage :)
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 20 pages (459 Comments)