August 17, 2009 2:28 PM PDT

Three men indicted in largest U.S. data breach

by Elinor Mills
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 19 comments

Two Russians and a Florida man were charged on Monday with hacking into Heartland Payment Systems, 7-Eleven, and the Hannaford Brothers supermarket chain, and stealing data related to more than 130 million credit and debit cards.

The indictment names 28-year-old Albert Gonzalez of Miami, who already has been charged with stealing data related to 40 million credit cards from eight major retailers, including TJ Maxx, and two unnamed co-conspirators based in Russia.

The breach involving Heartland and the others is believed to be the largest hacking and identity theft case ever prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice. In addition to Heartland, 7-Eleven, and Hannaford Brothers, it involves two unnamed corporate victims, according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney's office.

The three men were indicted on charges of conspiring to hack into computer networks and stealing data as far back as October 2006. Gonzalez, whose aliases include "segvec" and "soupnazi," and the others allegedly found victims on a list of Fortune 500 companies and visited retail locations to see what type of checkout systems they used.

They used an SQL injection attack to steal the data and used computers in California, Illinois, New Jersey, Latvia, Ukraine, and the Netherlands for storing malware and stolen data and launching attacks, according to the indictment. In an SQL injection attack, a small malicious script is inserted, exploiting a vulnerability in the database layer of an application that feeds information to the Web site.

They also allegedly installed backdoors and sniffers to intercept data in real time as it was processed by the victims and tried to hide their actions by accessing the victim networks through proxy computers, modifying their software so as to evade detection by antivirus programs and programming it to delete traces of the malware from victim networks, according to the indictment.

The men also tried to sell the stolen data to others, the indictment alleges. They are charged with conspiracy to gain unauthorized access to computers, commit fraud in connection with computers and damage computers, as well as conspiracy to commit wire fraud. They face up to 35 years in prison as well as a fine of $1.25 million.

Gonzalez, who is in federal custody, was charged in May 2008 in New York with hacking the computer network of Dave & Buster's restaurant chain and was named in an indictment in Massachusetts in August 2008 related to the TJX breach. Other alleged victims in those cases include BJ's Wholesale Club, OfficeMax, Boston Market, Barnes & Noble, Sports Authority, Forever 21, and DSW. He faces trial on the New York charges next month.

Heartland reported the breach on presidential Inauguration Day in January and said that although it occurred last year, it found evidence of the intrusion just the week prior.

Formerly a federal government informant, Gonzalez also was arrested in New Jersey in 2003 on charges related to ATM and debit card fraud.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from InSecurity Complex
Web-based Lookout protects mobile devices, data
Using Facebook and Twitter safely
Firefox, Adobe top buggiest-software list
Adobe to patch zero-day Reader, Acrobat hole
Keeping Uncle Sam from spying on citizens
Facebook sues men for allegedly phishing, spamming
Scammers exploit Google Doodle to spread malware
Symantec confirms zero-day Acrobat, Reader attack
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by davidmoron August 17, 2009 3:39 PM PDT
Don't guys who do this usually get hired by security companies? That is the myth at least
Reply to this comment
by SIGHUP August 17, 2009 3:43 PM PDT
Perhaps, but with 35 years in jail, I think they will be a little behind on the technology when they get out.
by Lerianis3 August 18, 2009 4:03 AM PDT
Actually, davidmoron, that is usually the truth of these security intrusions. They are either done by someone with inside knowledge or by a disgruntled former employee who just 'looked and listened'.
by armen2772 August 17, 2009 4:08 PM PDT
Wicked stuff!
Reply to this comment
by pentest August 17, 2009 5:23 PM PDT
Cyber crimes don't get prosecuted, this is the exception that proves the rule.
Reply to this comment
by inachu August 17, 2009 5:53 PM PDT
They get patted on the back in Russia and Israel.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan August 17, 2009 6:21 PM PDT
PCI Compliance really means nothing to these companies. This has been a known issue for nearly a year now, but they didn't make it publically known. Instead you just find a company to pay off for the PCI compliance certification without actually being tested or compliant. That's one of the investigations going on now with some of the box stores mentioned above.

It's not terribly difficutl to do the man in the middle scenario for most of these box stores. Registers run wireless connections to the store's server. This data is *not* encrypted. Getting the WEP key isn't terribly difficult these days and these stores don't update that often to keep up with the technology. It makes you really scared to use your card at any of these stores once you realize how behind they are.

Can it be fixed? Oh sure, they could update with any of the products currently available and be far better off, but right now most are a good 5-7 years behind the tech curve.
Reply to this comment
by SIGHUP August 17, 2009 7:05 PM PDT
Here is a quote from the CEO off of http://www.cso.com.au/article/314712/heartland_ceo_data_breach_qsas_let_us_down. Carr: "The audits done by our QSAs (Qualified Security Assessors) were of no value whatsoever. To the extent that they were telling us we were secure beforehand, that we were PCI compliant, was a major problem. ?
by Vegaman_Dan August 17, 2009 10:18 PM PDT
@SIGHUP:

Unfortunately there are a few rather poor certification companies out there that are willing to take a payment to say a company is compliant without actually ever going on site or doing any testing at all. :/
by Lerianis3 August 18, 2009 4:05 AM PDT
You are right, Vegaman_Dan. Instead of using WEP they should be using WPA at least, or better yet have these things WIRED and not being transmitted through the air in the first place.
by Vegaman_Dan August 18, 2009 11:32 AM PDT
@Lerianis3:

Running cabling to checkstands is now a hassle for store design. Power outlets are everywhere so now a lot of retailers are running wireless registers with IP phones. Much more flexible in configuration and layout, but there are some rather strong security issues to address as you can see.

Yes, they can be fixed, but it takes money and updates that a lot of these companies simply do not see the need for...until something like this happens.
by ferricoxide August 17, 2009 6:30 PM PDT
I had to have three credit cards and a debit card replaced because of the Heartland breech. What's worse, was, the only credit card that I'd had with me in Europe was precautionarily canceled by my bank the morning I arrived in Germany.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 August 18, 2009 4:06 AM PDT
HUH! They cancelled it WITHOUT your permission? Something reeks there.... they will NOT cancel credit cards without your permission and in fact, it's illegal to do so! They have to inform you either by phone or letter BEFORE they do that and get your permission.
If your bank does that automatically, they are breaking a hell of a lot of American state and federal and British federal laws.
by Swimming_Bird August 18, 2009 7:45 AM PDT
It seems to me that his bank thought that his card was comprised when they saw charges coming out of Europe. They can put a block on your card if they suspect fraud. If you contacted them to let them know you were traveling then they probably did make a mistake.
by bvdon August 17, 2009 7:44 PM PDT
They took about $500 from my account. The credit union flagged the transactions and reimbursed 100% within days and issued a new card.

So, thank you gents, may you enjoy your stay in jail.

I have to assume that the data was unencrypted. That should be criminal; it's a clear breach of fiduciary duty.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 August 18, 2009 4:07 AM PDT
It actually IS illegal, but they are not enforcing the law that makes it illegal yet because SO DAMNED MANY places whined about "Our registers cannot support encryption or WPA!"
by biffhenerson August 18, 2009 7:22 AM PDT
Yet another set of defective humans. Put them in cages. 35 years will not be enough.
Reply to this comment
by Michichael August 18, 2009 12:05 PM PDT
Something seems fishy about this story. Isn't it kind of convenient that they already have the guy they're accusing in custody? I think there's more to this than the media is being told about, and I've got a gut feeling that that guy isn't responsible for TWO major hacks - the logisitics of pulling off multiple things like that with just one guy stateside is pretty mindboggling. And keep in mind folks, innocent until proven guilty. He's accused of it, doesn't mean he did it or isn't just a scape goat. The law in the US isn't about right or wrong, or even the truth. It's about what side has the most money to make a problem go away.
Reply to this comment
by kellybrieger August 19, 2009 8:03 PM PDT
Banks, card issuers and other FIs must consider putting the control into the hands of the individuals, taking the form of SMS alerts. Clickatell provides credit/debit card and account transaction notifications via SMS to enable anytime, anywhere alerts between financial service providers and customers, giving power to people to scrutinize transactions as they happen; and not waiting for the fraud to get out of control.
Reply to this comment
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About InSecurity Complex

Elinor Mills became fascinated with hacker culture when she was sent to Las Vegas to cover DefCon in 1995. Since then, script kiddies have given way to cyber criminals targeting bank passwords, and privacy risks are everywhere, from Google to Facebook and the iPhone. InSecurity Complex keeps tabs on the flaws, the foibles, and the fixes.

Add this feed to your online news reader

InSecurity Complex topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right