• On TechRepublic: Get 5 cool Microsoft apps -- for free
August 6, 2009 4:32 PM PDT

Twitter, Facebook attack targeted one user

by Elinor Mills
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 111 comments

A Georgian blogger with accounts on Twitter, Facebook, LiveJournal, and Google's Blogger and YouTube was targeted in a denial-of-service attack that led to the sitewide outage at Twitter and problems at the other sites on Thursday, according to a Facebook executive.

The blogger, who uses the account name "Cyxymu," (the name of a town in the Republic of Georgia) had accounts on all of the different sites that were attacked at the same time, Max Kelly, chief security officer at Facebook, told CNET News.

"It was a simultaneous attack across a number of properties targeting him to keep his voice from being heard," Kelly said. "We're actively investigating the source of the attacks, and we hope to be able to find out the individuals involved in the back end and to take action against them, if we can."

Cyxymu LiveJournal account on cached version of Google.

(Credit: LiveJournal)

Kelly declined to speculate on who was behind the attack, but he said: "You have to ask who would benefit the most from doing this and think about what those people are doing and the disregard for the rest of the users and the Internet."

Twitter was down for several hours beginning early Thursday morning, and it suffered periodic slowness and time-outs throughout the day.

Cyxymu's LiveJournal page wasn't accessible, but a cached version showed that it was updated on Thursday with a message about the denial-of-service, or DoS, attacks on his accounts on the United States-based sites. "Now it's obvious it's a special attack against me and Georgians," said the message, in Russian.

The site also apologized for a spam e-mail attack in which the sender was spoofed and made to look like the e-mails were sent by him. Screenshots are shown. It's unclear whether or how the spam attack is related to the DoS attacks.

In the distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack on the sites, computers that have been compromised by viruses or other malware are instructed by the attacker's computer to visit the specific Web sites all at the same time and repeatedly. The barrage of connection requests overwhelms the target sites, making it so that legitimate Web traffic can't get through.

Such coordinated attacks require the efforts of tens of thousands or more of hijacked computers, which together form a botnet. Spammers send e-mails with malicious attachments or URLs to millions of people to create botnets. Criminals also can lease existing botnets for specific campaigns for as little as 5 cents to 10 cents per bot.

A Facebook representative dismissed a theory that the attack was triggered by a spam campaign in which e-mails had links to the sites. It's unlikely that there would be enough recipients--all clicking on the URLs at the same time--to bring a site down, he said. There was a spam campaign that directed people to Cyxymu's accounts, but it wasn't the cause of the DoS, he said.

"The people who are coordinating this attack, the criminals, are definitely determined and using a lot of resources," Kelly said. "If they're asking our infrastructure to generate hundreds of pages a second, that's a lot of pages our users can't see."

Facebook and Google were able to minimize any impact to their sites, including Blogger, YouTube, and Google Sites, a free Web site service. Facebook even managed to keep the Cyxymu account accessible to Web surfers from that region, Kelly said, though it was inaccessible to people in other geographic areas, including San Francisco.

This was the first coordinated attack on the sites, and all the companies involved were working closely on the investigation, he said. "My team and the teams that are working together at all these companies are doing a really good job very quickly, and I'm proud and happy," he said.

Twitter and LiveJournal did not immediately return e-mails and calls seeking comment.

A Google representative offered this statement: "We are aware that a handful of non-Google sites were impacted by a DoS attack this morning and are in contact with some affected companies to help investigate this attack. Google systems prevented substantive impact to our services."

Political conflicts between Russia and its former republic spilled online last year with DoS attacks and Web site defacements going in both directions.

For more information, listen to Larry Magid's podcast interview with Elinor Mills.

Updated at 7:39 p.m. PDT, with Facebook saying a spam campaign did not cause the DoS, and at 6:35 p.m., with information from Cyxymu's site, more about the spam attack, how DDoS attacks work, and background on the Russia-Georgia conflict.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from InSecurity Complex
Hacker 'Mudge' gets DARPA job
26 Windows, Office holes patched in 13 bulletins
Microsoft, Google split over browser bug bounty
Verizon temporarily blocks some 4chan sites
PCI compliance: What it is and why it matters (Q&A)
BlackBerry has spyware risk too, researcher says
DOJ not pleased with latest Google Book agreement
Microsoft to patch 26 holes in Windows, Office
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (111 Comments)
by CyberDem0n August 6, 2009 5:04 PM PDT
Well done, downing servers as strong as Twitter's is a real job well done, but the prob is you got caught :D
Reply to this comment
by SaneMind August 6, 2009 11:06 PM PDT
In terms of IT infrastructure, Twitter is probably the worst among big online players. It goes down too often and the search is pathetically slow.
by Nataku4ca August 7, 2009 9:48 AM PDT
um... i dont think they caught him yet, or am i reading it wrong...
by superaznman August 7, 2009 3:36 PM PDT
ahahaha i think cyberdem0n was being sacastic in saying "servers as strong as twitters". thats a joke, right?
by pentest August 6, 2009 5:11 PM PDT
People who keep twitter off-line are doing a public service for all humanity.
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 August 6, 2009 6:08 PM PDT
ROFL.
by ca5ter August 6, 2009 6:27 PM PDT
I'll second that motion.
by Sporlo August 6, 2009 6:45 PM PDT
haha nice. I'll have to agree with that one :P
by SaneMind August 6, 2009 11:08 PM PDT
Ahahahahaha ... I was getting addicted to it and with its outage.... I can actually do some good work @ office .... ahahahaha. <br /> <br />Opps ... I must switch out from CNET too ... darn !!!
by jchanski21 August 7, 2009 6:12 AM PDT
a-freaking-men.
by The_happy_switcher August 7, 2009 11:22 AM PDT
My day is ruined because I don't know what Ashton Kutcher had for breakfast.
by gggg sssss August 6, 2009 5:13 PM PDT
last week we heard that iPhones can be remotely triggered to cause cell system outages. <br /> <br />Yesterday we heard that the US military is going to use Google Voice as a tactical communications vehicle. <br /> <br />Last week I suggested that every iPhone has a secret back door installed by their Chinese makers to allow the Chinese govt to take control of them. <br /> <br />Yesterday Bill Clinton poked a stick in the other communist Govt eye by getting the journalists released. <br /> <br />Today the Chinese govt said WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE and unleashed a DDOS attack on twitter to see if it works. Wait till the army actually needs to use Google Voice. How do you spell DDOS in Chinese?
Reply to this comment
by AdeBarkah August 6, 2009 7:25 PM PDT
??????? ((literally means "distributed refusal of service") though most Chinese hackers would just say DDOS. ;-)
by AdeBarkah August 6, 2009 7:29 PM PDT
Oops I guess no Chinese characters on CNET.
by ckh1272 August 6, 2009 11:36 PM PDT
Be careful. Those tinfoil hats can get pretty hot this time of the year. LOL!
by MacSnob August 7, 2009 5:19 AM PDT
today we learned that OMG! Intel Celeron chips in terrorists' hands!
by marianmerritt August 6, 2009 5:14 PM PDT
It's likely that the attack still involved a botnet, a distributed network of infected computers working for a remote cybercriminal or "botherder". Individual users need to maintain secure computers to avoid having their computer infected with a bot. <br /> <br />Elinor, thank you for the update. This is an interesting development and we'll look forward to learning more as the story progresses. <br /> <br />Marian Merritt <br />Symantec/Norton
Reply to this comment
by JoeF2 August 6, 2009 6:20 PM PDT
"Individual users need to maintain secure computers to avoid having their computer infected with a bot."<br /><br />Yes, but that's unfortunately a pipe dream, because of one OS provider having been pretty bad with securing their OS, and their browser, and when they tried, they botched it, with Vista.<br />You'd only get people to secure their computer if you make them responsible for the harm that their computer causes.
by beatrixmcg August 6, 2009 6:53 PM PDT
I wonder if the rash of txt &#38; IM viruses this last week had any bearing on creating of the botnet? I got a MILLION of them (that I didn't fall for) that started as text that said "Hey, log in and check out my pics..." and with a URL. Several people from work fell for it.
by mbenedict August 6, 2009 7:33 PM PDT
@JoeF2: lame Mac fanboy attempt, except that legions clueless OS X users are also part of botnets. The worst part is how Mac users aren't even responsible enough to run anti-malware on their machines. Way to be good netizens, crapple-fans. Not.
by lloydraphah August 6, 2009 11:14 PM PDT
@mbenedict: lame PC fanboy attempt, as there was no reference to Macintosh or OS X in his post at all... l2read before you start trolling
by JoeF2 August 6, 2009 11:41 PM PDT
@mbenedict:<br />A bit defensive, eh? I don't even have a Mac.<br />I suggest leaving the world of MS fanboys and entering the real world, troll.
by Eddie-c August 7, 2009 8:17 AM PDT
@Joe: oh really .... so the fact that crapple put out 15 patches this week to fix, among other things, *critical* issues such as png exploits makes crapple so much better eh? Right, ya daft wazzock.
by pentest August 7, 2009 11:19 AM PDT
hmm,<br /><br />How many new OS X exploits came about this week? How many Windows?
by JoeF2 August 7, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
Ahh, a bunch of Windows fanboys...<br />Go and ask your mother if she has kep her PC with XP up-to-date with patches.<br />You don't have far to go, since you obviously still live in the basement...
by Eddie-c August 7, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
@pentest: this week, none. You are FAIL. pmsl.
by Eddie-c August 7, 2009 12:45 PM PDT
@joef2: Wow. Your witty response astounds me. Instead of being a simple troll why not actually get (1) a clue (2) a life (3) grow up eh. Idjit.
See more comment replies
by L33tLuXX0rz August 6, 2009 5:16 PM PDT
That is quite intense to just target one person. But I guess we can say that although millions of people experience discomfort Im quite sure these were some of the most productive hours some people experienced since joining the social media revolution.
Reply to this comment
by JoeF2 August 6, 2009 11:46 PM PDT
The botnet herders, i.e., the criminals who create the botnets, just sell their services to the highest bidder.<br />It doesn't matter to them who gets targeted or for what reason. They only care about the money.<br />If you spend some time in the spam-fighting community, you learn that these things are not unusual. This was a bit more high-profile than usual, but these criminals have brought down an anti-spam company before (the Israeli company Blue Security.)
by superaznman August 7, 2009 3:40 PM PDT
the question is, why didn't they make the guy "disapear" in the physical sense, rather than prob. spending MORE money just to TEMPORARY disable his profiles....
by JoeF2 August 9, 2009 12:00 AM PDT
Renting a botnet is probably a lot cheaper than hiring a hitman. All the sheep with their unsecured Windows boxes come free.<br />And yes, before the MS fanboys come back again, the botnets are pretty much exclusively comprised of Windows machines. People who use Macs or Linux tend to know a bit about technology and how to secure their machines. Joe Sixpack is unlikely to have a Mac or a Linux box, and he has most likely never heard of botnets.
by santuccie August 10, 2009 2:23 AM PDT
@JoeF2:<br /><br />'And yes, before the MS fanboys come back again, the botnets are pretty much exclusively comprised of Windows machines.'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Possibly, simply because Windows XP is still the most prominent OS online and the most targeted. However, there is an iBotnet out there as well. And since Vista and Windows 7 have proven infinitely harder to penetrate remotely than Leopard, and especially since we are finally seeing ItW attacks on Mac OS, we do know that criminals are trying to learn more about the platform; be assured the drive-by downloads are on the way. And when they do turn up, all it will take is a smart move on the part of the bot herders to plant the exploits on well-established sites that are likely to be visited by Mac users. If this happens, I predict an explosion larger in proportion than that of Conficker itself, because the percentage of secured Macs is far below that of protected PCs, even PCs running Windows XP.<br /><br />'People who use Macs or Linux tend to know a bit about technology and how to secure their machines.'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Linux users, maybe, but NOT Mac users. In general, Mac users have one of two stories: 1) They are longtime Mac loyalists who have never installed a piece of hardware or a driver themselves. 2) They are former Windows users who threw up their hands and emigrated because they COULDN'T figure out what to do after malware started to flood the Web. Couple either scenario with the fact that there is more stuff out there for Windows than there is for the Mac, and the limitations of the Mac universe further constrict upon user potential. The most the average Mac can do is light to medium video editing. And whether you use Boot Camp or not, I don't know of one gamer whose rig is a Mac. Even an MBP can't handle Crysis, and we're talking a $2,500 laptop! You can get an XPS with better graphics for about half that much.<br /><br />Sorry, but you really put your foot in your mouth this time.
by JoeF2 August 10, 2009 10:32 AM PDT
@santuccie:<br />"In general, Mac users have one of two stories"<br /><br />And you know that how exactly? Are you a Mac user who falls in on of the categories you claim to know???<br />And since you are talking about foot in mouth, that's where your foot is.<br /><br />As far as botnets on machines other than Windows are concerned, they are unlikely to be widespread, simply due to the fact that people don't run Linux and Macs as superuser. You need admin rights to install a botnet. And only Windows pretty much requires to run with admin rights.<br />And as far as Vista and Win7 are concerned, forget about that already. There are far more XP, and even W2K machines out there. The average botnet machine is not a gamer machine, it is an old XP from your mom. She is not going to buy a new PC to run Visa or Win7. That's what you clueless fanboys always forget.
by santuccie August 10, 2009 10:59 AM PDT
@JoeF2:<br /><br />'And you know that how exactly? Are you a Mac user who falls in on of the categories you claim to know???'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Cute, kid, but out the Window with that one (pun intended). The reason I know is because I know my history, and because I work in computer service.<br /><br />'And since you are talking about foot in mouth, that's where your foot is.'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;So, when do you graduate from high school? Just so you're aware, "No, YOU'RE wrong!" is an empty argument in the adult world. You have to explain why you think I'm wrong (or, more specifically, why you would LIKE to believe I'm wrong).<br /><br />'As far as botnets on machines other than Windows are concerned, they are unlikely to be widespread, simply due to the fact that people don't run Linux and Macs as superuser. You need admin rights to install a botnet. And only Windows pretty much requires to run with admin rights.'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Apparently, you're not reading my posts. Once again, Mac OS authentication is like running a limited user account in XP, and that is easily circumvented if no other security measures are present. You claim to be a Linux kernel hacker; ever heard of "privilege escalation?" There are people who say there are more of these vulnerabilities for the Mac than there are for Windows. I can't verify this myself but, given how security researchers have been poo-pooing Apple's security since 2007, I wouldn't doubt it.<br /><br />'And as far as Vista and Win7 are concerned, forget about that already. There are far more XP, and even W2K machines out there. The average botnet machine is not a gamer machine, it is an old XP from your mom. She is not going to buy a new PC to run Visa or Win7.'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Obscuriy does not equate to genuine security. This statement likens you unto a sitting duck, placing his life in the hands of the hunter and hoping he'll pass you over for a larger animal. Most Windows machines run some form of security software, be it antimalware, sandboxing, IPS/IDS, DPI, kernel lockdown, or whatever; most Macs do NOT. In case you haven't heard of Leap A, or iBotnet, or any of the others, let me inform you that people are trying to attack the Mac already. I understand it took three years following the release of XP before the first drive-by downloads appeared. But since everyone now knows what a drive-by download is, and because the Russians and Chinese have seen how easily people are doing it at CanSecWest, I wouldn't be surprised if Mac-targeted drive-by downloads come out much sooner than that.
by santuccie August 10, 2009 3:20 PM PDT
BTW, I completely missed your claim about W2K being more prevalent than Vista. Where do you get this information from? There are almost five times as many Macs as there are PCs running Windows 2000. And the Macs themselves are outnumbered 3:1 (almost 4:1) by Windows Vista.<br /><br />That said, XP's continued dominance of the global market is not entirely related to consumer dissatisfaction with Vista (I'm not denying the truth in this), as most consumers take whatever you give them. Yes, there are some OEMs still offering XP on some models, but the main issue has to do with the huge gap in time between the releases of XP and Vista. XP was five years old when Vista finally hit the market. It is eight years old now, and has already lost nearly 20% market share to Vista.<br /><br />Another issue is the fact that netbooks have made a big splash on the market, and most of them have replaced Linux with Windows XP. But Windows 7 is in fact nimble enough to run on a netbook, and has been well-received by virtually everyone who's hated Vista. Windows 7 has been heralded the "XP killer," the worthy replacement that will retire the aging XP once and for all. And as XP systems start getting replaced for obsolescence, this will translate into fewer machines that are reachable to most hackers, which in turn will translate to the need for new soil in which to plant the seeds for new botnets.<br /><br />As far as we know, the only security implementation Apple has planned for the upcoming Snow Leopard is ASLR. Without DEP, Safe Unlinking, patch protection, or anything else, this may not be enough, especially when a majority of PCs on the market now are running 64-bit versions of Windows, on which DEP is hardware enforced and seemingly impossible to circumvent for a buffer overflow (if even a security researcher has successfully compromised Vista x64, I'm not aware of it). My prediction is that history will repeat itself, and Apple will once more be the one under attack... this time for profit.
by JoeF2 August 10, 2009 3:51 PM PDT
@santuccie<br />"BTW, I completely missed your claim about W2K being more prevalent than Vista. Where do you get this information from?"<br /><br />You obviously don't know much about businesses. Lots of companies continue to have W2K machines, e.g., for secretarial tasks.<br />May I suggest going out into the real world for a change, instead of trolling Internet forums?
by santuccie August 10, 2009 4:45 PM PDT
@JoeF2:<br /><br />This "obviously don't know" bit, as well as your old and moldy "troll/trolling" routine is completely empty, ESPECIALLY when we're going by how many machines hackers can reach remotely (referring to Internet-connected machines). According to Net Applications, the source most articles refer to, all Internet-connected Windows 2000 machines (including business machines) constitute less than 1% of the global market: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10<br /><br />If you're going to keep trying to tell me that I "obviously don't know much," you'd better back that up with a link. And in case you've forgotten me telling you over and over again, the real troll is the one who finds it necessary to resort to childish name-calling and cursing. Show me a link, or accept the agony of correction once again. Seeing as how you continue to leap before you look, I'm sure you'll make this same mistake again. GROW UP already!
by FunnyBubble1 August 6, 2009 5:37 PM PDT
Ooh this should be easy to figure out. <br /> <br />Mother Russia of course. <br /> <br /> Nothing new just last year the initial cyber war was produced before the Russian invasion into Georgia. That?s a lot of ?Takedown power? to get one little guy.. <br /> <br />http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1670
Reply to this comment
by Police_States_of_America August 6, 2009 6:25 PM PDT
no wonder google is planning to build an operating system for computers. cant remember the last time i heard about a successful linux botnet on a well-known up to date distro.
Reply to this comment
by mbenedict August 6, 2009 8:52 PM PDT
What? Linux botnet is old news:<br /><br />http://lwn.net/Articles/222153/<br /><br />There have been Linux botnets &#38; viruses around for years (e.g., the Rst-B virus). Also the recent psyb0t botnet was linux based.<br /><br />A couple of years ago when eBay was looking into botnet C&#38;C and phishing sites, to their surprise they encountered more rooted Linux servers than Windows boxes.
by ckh1272 August 6, 2009 11:38 PM PDT
@mbenedict--Don't tell them that!! Their tinfoil hat might burst into flames!
by odubtaig August 7, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
If mbenedict wasn't so stuck in the idiot fanboi mindset, he could have simply pointed out that patched and up-to-date Windows machines don't succumb to botnets either but he instead put up a link based on two year old information (against someone specifically referring to only recent and up-to-date distros) which is as relevant to Windows as it is to Linux as most such attacks rely on things like SQL injection and privilege escalation.<br /><br />The correct reply would have been 'can't remember the last time I heard of a successful Windows botnet on any computer patched within the last month' but it seems mbenedict has so little faith in the security of Windows that he has to drag everything else down to his level.<br /><br />Easier to tear down and destroy and reinforce, eh m?
by Minotauro79 August 7, 2009 3:59 PM PDT
If any OS gets a market share near what Windows has had it will be hacked, turned inside out, and become vulnerable. Especially if everything is in the "cloud" like Google wants.
by FunnyBubble1 August 7, 2009 6:45 PM PDT
When are you going to realize EVERYTHING is open there is NO safe OS.. No better OS. the argument of Better OS is like so 90's. Lots of IDS / Firewalls are run on Unix and are Hackable. The truth is its not a Virus till its found. So with maleware and spyware you could be helping the cause. Every OS can be opend like a can if needed.
by mbenedict August 8, 2009 5:26 AM PDT
If odubtaig wasn't so stuck in the idiot fanboi mindset, he would've seen that I specifically noted a recent, Linux-based botnet.<br /><br />Easier to tear down and destroy and reinforce, eh o?
by JoeF2 August 9, 2009 12:08 AM PDT
@FunnyBubble:<br />Sure, everything can be broken. But it is so much easier to do that with Windows. Why would these criminals hire the expertise to crack some Linux vulnerability, when every 12-year-old kid can crack Windows? They go for the low-hanging fruit.<br />One of the major differences is that on Linux, for example, people don't run the system with administrator rights.<br />On Windows, using admin rights was pretty much a requirement to get any program running. Granted, MS tried to change that with Vista, but they botched it, so badly that the end result has been less security, with people switching UAC off. This is a fundamental flaw of Windows, which requires admin rights to install anything that has to do with COM, which means basically every program.<br />To change this would require a radical change of Windows which would break pretty much every program. MS is not going to do that, so botnets are unfortunately here to stay.
by zepol22 August 9, 2009 7:50 AM PDT
@JoeF2 <br /><br />Fail. If you knew anything about OS architecture you would know that hacking can be done to every major OS very easily. It does not matter if it is vista, OSX, or linux, they can all be hacked the same. You have to understand how a hacker works. Who is going to take the time to code a virus for OSX when it has 2% of the market share. The hacker is obviously going to code for windows so that their virus infects the most people. Any 12 year old that is hacking windows is using tools that others spent time creating. SO your argument fails.
by odubtaig August 9, 2009 3:23 PM PDT
You're quite correct, I had missed that. A botnet based entirely on brute-force password guessing which shouldn't have been possible if Netgear had properly configured their customised version. I'd quite forgotton about that.<br /><br />In no way does it change the fact that instead of pointing out that most Windows botnets rely on flaws that were patched about six months ago you decided to pull everything down to your level in a race to the bottom of who can be the most negative.<br /><br />It could have been pointed out that Windows, like the Netgear routers, could be perfectly secure with the proper configuration (which with appliance routers should be done by the manufacturer) and updating but it seems you're not capable of anything but bile-filled negativity.<br /><br />"Pull it down,drag it down<br />Drag it down,pull it down<br />Till there's nothing to look up to<br />But the brand names on the posters"<br /><br />I mean, why not just reinforce the idea that Windows is inherently insecure yourself?
by santuccie August 10, 2009 2:53 AM PDT
@JoeF2"<br /><br />'Sure, everything can be broken. But it is so much easier to do that with Windows. Why would these criminals hire the expertise to crack some Linux vulnerability, when every 12-year-old kid can crack Windows? They go for the low-hanging fruit.'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Wrong again. The most recent version of Windows that is less secure than Mac OS is XP, and XP came out before anyone knew what a drive-by download was. You obviously don't know your tech history because, as suggested by your last few sentences, you're blaming MS for failing to address a problem that didn't even exist yet!<br /><br />'On Windows, using admin rights was pretty much a requirement to get any program running. Granted, MS tried to change that with Vista, but they botched it, so badly that the end result has been less security, with people switching UAC off. This is a fundamental flaw of Windows, which requires admin rights to install anything that has to do with COM, which means basically every program.'<br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;This is typical of a Mac user. You're treating Windows as if it were your own platform, with a single point of failure... authentication. In case you haven't been following Pwn2Own, authentication doesn't mean much. Linux may have extra layers of security, depending on what distro you run. But Mac OS only has authentication, which is equivalent to "Run as" from a limited user account in XP. And limited user accounts are easily pwned, as is the Mac.<br /><br />Security researchers call Mac OS "easy pickings," and have successfully pwned it each year within minutes on day 2 of the competition. Vista wasn't compromised until day 3 last year, and Windows 7 beta was taken two months before Microsoft debuted its newest addition to the highly successful duo of NX and ASLR, Safe Unlinking. Even if the user were to turn UAC all the way off, Windows 7 RTM would likely still be harder to pwn than Vista itself, which in turn is still more inherently secure than OS X.<br /><br />You're not getting into much detail. You seem to be doing little (if any) research on your own, and are instead trusting blindly in everything a fellow Mac fundamentalist tells you (likely because it's all you wanted to hear), while all shields are up against anything pro-Windows that anyone else might have to say. You'd do well to start doing your homework and get current on things before being so declarative from atop your soap box in the sand dunes; you look pretty silly when you fall flat on your face like this. Here's some light reading to get you started:<br /><br />http://securitywatch.eweek.com/apple/mac_hacked_via_safari_browser_in_pwn2own_contest.html<br />http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/03/mac-owned-on-2nd-day-of-pwn2own-hack-contest/<br />http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2917<br />http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/securitymonkey/mac-os-x-local-user-exploit-appears-12026<br />http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-04-17-030-35-SC-SW<br />http://blogs.computerworld.com/why_windows_is_safer_than_the_mac<br />http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=533&#38;tag=rbxccnbzd1
See more comment replies
by tppcnet August 6, 2009 7:12 PM PDT
Cut Russia off the net.
Reply to this comment
by ewelch August 6, 2009 7:30 PM PDT
All your Twits are belong to Putin.
Reply to this comment
by JohnsBeharry August 6, 2009 10:20 PM PDT
ROTFLMAO!<br /><br />I had to make an account just to say that &gt;.&lt;
by Wolfie_Rankin August 6, 2009 7:39 PM PDT
Gotta love people who write their disapproval of another internet service, while not exactly "enjoying the outdoors" themselves... "Boo Twitter", "Get a life" Yes guys, I mean you.
Reply to this comment
by scotne1 August 6, 2009 8:22 PM PDT
I wish sometimes people would just cut off the internet to these countries, denial of service attacks out of China and Russia are becoming common news.<br /><br />Mabey we should just cut them off untill they start procecuting thier internet criminal properly so this doesnt happen.<br /><br />[CNET editors' note: URL removed]
Reply to this comment
by ckh1272 August 6, 2009 11:40 PM PDT
Way to slide in that very much unrelated link. SPAM!!
by JoeF2 August 6, 2009 11:54 PM PDT
And we start with cutting off Internet access to spammers like you...
by Pony99CA August 7, 2009 3:56 AM PDT
Hear, hear on cutting China and Russia (and the Ukraine) off the Internet.<br /><br />Boo for your spam link.
by reywolf August 7, 2009 2:36 PM PDT
what the heck do you mean cut off the internet!!!!<br />i have two words to say<br />proxy and satellite<br />hackers are much much smarter than the average computer geek. they would just hook the computers to the internet in another country. most likely in AMERICA
by JoeF2 August 9, 2009 12:12 AM PDT
@greywolf:<br />This has nothing to do with "hackers". The people who create the botnets aren't hackers. They are run--of-the-mill criminals. All they have to use is run some scripts. The scripts do all the work for them. Any 12-year old kid can do that.<br />The people who run these unsecured Windows machines are making it very easy. It is like keeping your front door open and have a sign on the lawn saying "open door, come in."
by clickawayforfun August 6, 2009 8:35 PM PDT
I think it's outrageous that anyone blame twitter or facebook or any of it's users. The service is free and many people use it as a form of communication to their loved ones. These ***** that do this sort of thing should be brought to justice and pay for their crime. There are a lot of things going on in the world right now and these sites provide people with communication to parts of the world that it's needed most. But then again all these hackers can do is think about their own ego's and do something that is so lame. If anyone hasn't said it I will. Thank you Twitter and thank you facebook. Knowing that I can keep in touch with family from all over the world as a result of your contributions is greatly appreciated. <br /> <br />Mark Stoltz, Toronto Ontario, Canada
Reply to this comment
by JoeF2 August 6, 2009 11:50 PM PDT
How do you "bring somebody to justice" in Russia or China?<br />These things are a fact of life now. It's not going to go away, unless everybody would stop using Windows (and how likely is that?)<br />But you can make a start, by throwing out that Windows POS and install a real OS. There are lots of alternatives out there.
by dainathomas1 August 7, 2009 1:02 AM PDT
this all i seriously pathetic .. what I know is .. i m able to login .. but Unable to do anything .. these viruses and hackers ... gosh .. and u mentioned this happened for one person .. i dnt think this thing is practical .. just to hack whole of the site .. because of one person ??? does that make sense .....
Reply to this comment
by renGek August 7, 2009 6:33 PM PDT
Next thing you know wars get started over one person....oh wait thats how world war I got started.
by roxfl August 7, 2009 1:15 AM PDT
This is just a load. Can't people just stop harming people. And then we can wait for the aliens then we can ask for their technology. And if they're not friendly we do what we do best we kill'em.
Reply to this comment
by Pashgan August 7, 2009 2:41 AM PDT
Cyxymu's blog @ LJ was downed about year ago in similar circumstances. His name is Georgi D. and he is a resident of Tbilisi, Georgia + somewhat popular blogger.
Reply to this comment
by gengosa August 7, 2009 2:50 AM PDT
This kind of attack is exist due to broad knowledge of some users on the internet. But this is also a unique way in testing the security protection. From this act of spammers it can provide a usefull brainstorming for the developers and programmers on that social networking. Theres no LAW to punish you le!.... :) <br /> <br />Marcelo Gengosa <br />www.gengosa.com <br />Official Content Solution Inc.
Reply to this comment
by JournalistXX August 7, 2009 2:54 AM PDT
I can't understand why you CNET guys are <br />involved in politics! <br /> A friend of mine was at that war, when georgia attacked south osetia , he've made some photos, wrote an article but it wasn't published because some guys from Washington DC didn't want this. And what do you think is next? He have found his photos on many sites and have seen them on TV as approval that russia brought out the war. SO *** IS THIS??? DEMOCRACY?? <br />Our politics are playing in silly games, they feed us **** and want us to belive in everything they say. <br />It'll be an year after that war, and georgia wants us ( western world) again to believe in that ******* **** they've made. <br />South osetia was a part of georgia and, georgia's goverment decided to return them by force, of course with help of US , because they said that it was war for the democracy... oh yeah??? <br />They crushed people by tanks for the democracy? bunch of ******* politics wants us to obey them, so ******* them all, if you want to know the truth you have to go there and ask people how it was. <br /> <br />have no time to write properly, just few minutes for a brake and back to work! .. will return soon...
Reply to this comment
by Mindstrike August 7, 2009 3:21 AM PDT
...and everyone was getting along so well...
Reply to this comment
by MacSnob August 7, 2009 5:17 AM PDT
Maybe this is related to the fact that Cuba has a bunch of intell celeron pcs in their possession. See article: OMG! Intel Celeron chips in terrorists' hands.
Reply to this comment
by aazippo1 August 7, 2009 5:26 AM PDT
I think its safe to assume this guy really ticked someone off!<br /><br />RT<br />www.anon-web-tools.net.tc
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 3 pages (111 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

Google's social side aims for some Buzz

Facebook and Twitter are the darlings of the social-media world, not Google--which hopes to change that with Buzz, betting it can organize your online social life.

Watching the birth of a gaming start-up

Stewart Butterfield and his friends are back at it with a new company. CNET's Daniel Terdiman was given exclusive, behind-the-scenes access as they built it from scratch.

About InSecurity Complex

Elinor Mills became fascinated with hacker culture when she was sent to Las Vegas to cover DefCon in 1995. Since then, script kiddies have given way to cyber criminals targeting bank passwords, and privacy risks are everywhere, from Google to Facebook and the iPhone. InSecurity Complex keeps tabs on the flaws, the foibles, and the fixes.

Add this feed to your online news reader

InSecurity Complex topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right