Google Voice now (kinda) works with your number
Google on Monday will begin giving users a new way to use their existing mobile phone number with parts of its Google Voice service.
No, it's not a full number port, which the company still says is coming and will eventually allow things like call screening, conference calling, or listening into a call before picking up--all with your existing number. Instead, Google is taking advantage of conditional call forwarding to let users send unanswered calls to Google's voice-mail service in place of the one provided by a user's carrier.
Once sent to Google, those voice messages are transcribed, then made available for playback and review online, or as an SMS message. Users can also take advantage of Google Voice's customized greeting service to give callers a different voice-mail greeting depending on what number they're calling from.
Google Voice users can now choose to use their own number, or take one of Google's.
(Credit: Google/CNET)In order to use the new service, a one-time setup is required, which has both new and existing Google Voice users walk through a wizard that asks for their mobile number and what carrier they're on. It then offers up the special numeric code they have to dial to enable conditional forwarding from their handset to Google Voice.
For users who have a Google Voice number in the same account as their existing mobile phone number, it will be business as usual; Google Voice's voice-mail section will denote which number it was from. Google Voice's senior product manager, Vincent Paquet, explained to me that this system has been designed so users don't have to make any tough choices about which number they want to use. It will also allow users to sign up to Google Voice without having to register a new number.
Smartphone users with visual voice-mail services (such as the iPhone) may find that these extra features aren't enough to warrant making the switch. However, users with older handsets are likely to find Google's offer enticing since it enables them to manage voice-mails both from their phone and on the Web.
The deal is made even sweeter by the fact that all major U.S. carriers are on board, Paquet says. This may come as a surprise to some, considering that just last month, Google, Apple, and AT&T clashed quite publicly over the rejection of Google's Voice application from Apple's App Store in July. But with this new service, Google is merely playing by each carrier's rules, using a feature that's long been available as a way for users to pass on calls they cannot take. There's also some serious potential for carriers to generate extra income in SMS fees for transcribed voice-mail messages that users would have otherwise spent just a minute or so listening to from their phones.
Google Voice remains in private beta, although earlier this month Google began putting invites into the in-boxes of its users, allowing them to invite their friends.
Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh. 






[CNET editor's note: Personal attack deleted.]
I presume this would mean, however, that if someone wants their home phone to continue to work as a ring-to line after porting their home number, they would have to change to another new number on their home line for Google Voice to ring to... unless Google becomes a local phone carrier.
By the way, I just tried the new features, and Google voicemail did not work with my Sprint number. Suckage!
GV has worked okay for what I need it for, the only problem being that when I call or text someone, they still see my cell or home number instead of my GV number - which sort of defeats the purpose of giving them my GV number in the first place.
I just wish cell providers gave you some way to check text messages via the web or to forward them to email. This would somewhat reduce my need for GV.
- by guidosarducci November 3, 2009 4:31 AM PST
- Competitive threat to carriers! Josh, you write, "all major U.S. carriers are on board" but have you checked with them to learn what they think of this? No answer forward has long been an available feature with the default programmed to send unanswered calls to the carrier's voicemail system. Google is simply showing users through it's wizard how to send those calls to GVoice. Spinvox uses a similar method to capture voicemail traffic.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)Carriers make money when people use minutes and data. Check a voicemail, bang there's a minute or two. Return the call, bang more minutes. Carriers HATE GVoice because it takes users off their voicemail system and gives them an alternative way to make the highest profit margin calls (international). Yes it might drive some additional SMS traffic but ownership of the user experience is where you make money. I think you'll see this as a first volley by Google to take traffic from wireless carriers and continue to push telecom providers into being dumb pipes.
Give ATT, VZW and TMo a call Josh and ask them their opinion of this service. Your readers would love to hear the response. No doubt it will be sprinkled with words like "open" and "user choice" but inside I'm confident they are fuming.