• On GameFAQs: Is it OK to lay my Wii down on its side?
July 16, 2009 9:31 AM PDT

Mozilla gives add-on developers a tip jar

by Josh Lowensohn

Mozilla has introduced a new pilot program for Firefox developers to make a little money off add-ons they've created. Developers now have the option to place a "contribution" button on their add-on page, which lets users donate any amount they wish via PayPal.

CNET News Poll

Firefox fees
How much would you be willing to pay for a Firefox add-on?

I would never pay for a browser add-on
$1 to $5
$6 to $10
$11 or more



View results

Contributions are optional, meaning users can continue to download and use add-ons without having to pay anything. Mozilla is also letting developers pick their own suggested price, although users can choose to pay whatever they wish.

For the pilot program, add-on creators get the entire amount of the contribution, minus PayPal's transaction fee. However, in the future that could change with Mozilla taking a small cut. Mozilla is also encouraging developers to set up special PayPal accounts for contributions under $12, since PayPal's fees are less if set up for micropayments.

Mozilla is running the pilot with a limited number of developers, and will likely open it up to all if it's a success. It's definitely a smart way to attract add-on developers to host their creations on Mozilla's site, since there's now a simpler way for them to get paid. However, it will be interesting to see if users are willing to part with their money when they don't really have to.

How much would you be willing to pay a developer for their add-on? Vote in the poll to the right.

Update: Here's an example of what it looks like live as seen on the Download Statusbar extension:

(Credit: CNET)
Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Recent posts from Web Crawler
Adobe's Photoshop app comes to Android
An unofficial way to 'dislike' things on Facebook
Digg gives hot stories a chance at its front page
Moodspin's mood tracker comes to the iPhone
Flickr betters its apps, developer showcase
'Compare My Docs' does just what you think it does
New app Chorus helps you find, share iPhone apps
Bing's new mobile site wants to be touched
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by sexydaddio July 16, 2009 9:41 AM PDT
I am not donating a damn thing.
Reply to this comment
by BigGuns149 July 16, 2009 6:24 PM PDT
I think the problem is that the vast majority of add-ons I seriously don't use enough to miss them if they break in a new update of Firefox.

That being said I realize that if the developers don't get anything for their work at some point they will stop developing the add-on and given enough new versions of Firefox it will break. Honestly, for all of the talk I remember far more add-ons 4-5 years ago than I do now, but a lot of developers stopped development because it took away too much time from their real jobs or their personal lives or maybe a combination of the two. Hobbies that don't pay inevitably get put on the backburner at some point. You might get back to it and you might not.

There are a handful of add-ons I feel useful that I might give a $1 or $2 although I am interested in what the fees are for these "special" Paypal accounts since a normal paypal account can face some stiff fees for small transactions.
by kieranmullen July 16, 2009 8:42 PM PDT
Not even for the adblock extension? It's wonderful!
by MadLyb July 16, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
I think it is a great idea and will perhaps lead to better quality in the add-ons developed.

I do not like the "Suggested Donation", you might as well be putting a price on the product and would probably shy away from 'tipping' someone who put a suggested amount on their product.

Most people will probably do very small amounts because the lifetime of these 'products' is extremely limited and your 'purchase' provides no guarantee of updates or support.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 July 16, 2009 9:59 AM PDT
Its a nice gesture but as soon as they start charging for add-ons it may be a problem.
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn July 16, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
That's probably the next step. The good news is that a big chunk of add-ons are simply tie-ins to free sites.
by ssj4Gogeta1 July 16, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
@Josh: I don't think Mozilla will ever charge for addons. Free addons is their biggest selling point. People will go to other browsers like Google Chrome (once it fully starts supporting addons).
by Josh.Lowensohn July 16, 2009 12:30 PM PDT
@ssj4Gogeta1: Mozilla may not, but developers should be entitled to. With each Firefox update they often have to go back and make sure everything works so that users can continue to use their creations. I think that effort should be able to be rewarded.
by Freedomstarfox July 16, 2009 7:32 PM PDT
Mozilla probably won't charge for the add-ons though some developers might try to find some way to.
by slickuser July 16, 2009 10:13 AM PDT
great idea!.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight July 16, 2009 11:39 AM PDT
It is a great idea. I'd kick in a buck when I had the loose change.
by sunthedeep July 16, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
the only one I would consider paying for is zotero... makes research a lot easier
Reply to this comment
by YankeePoodle July 16, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
Good Idea of extending the Firefox eco-system with sustained developer community. I like the idea, its cool
Reply to this comment
by ssj4Gogeta1 July 16, 2009 11:01 AM PDT
This will probably prevent what happened with NoScript and Google Reader Notifier addons
http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/2585/beware-google-reader-notifier-for-firefox-is-now-crapware/
Reply to this comment
by ssj4Gogeta1 July 16, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
"How much would you be willing to pay for a Firefox add-on?"

That's a silly question. It's like asking "how much would you be willing to pay for a software program?". Maybe 2 cents, maybe $1000, maybe nothing. It depends on how useful it is. You could ask "how much would you be willing to pay for the most useful addon that you use?"
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn July 16, 2009 12:31 PM PDT
Sure, but if we wanted to be more specific we'd have to include a laundry list of add-ons. This is intentionally general.
by hiqutipie July 17, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
Thats my position...I love certain add-ons & use them more then others so I have no problem making donations for add-ons that great but how do you charge for something that you have no idea of how good it will be & how often it will be utilized so that is kinda silly...

Then you have the problem of setting up an acct to pay or make donations...If it was easier people would donate easier to the more established add-ons...
by faceless128 July 16, 2009 1:30 PM PDT
i'd definitely donate a few dollars to mouse gestures redox, xmarks, greasemonkey, autopager and adblock plus.

the other addons... not really...
Reply to this comment
by COMPPROUK July 16, 2009 1:31 PM PDT
it not a bad idea for developers like ma self to donate but its not the donateing i dont mind its were the hell is the money going .... i dont want to donate any of my programming or software that i built for mozilla as such to sell it and then get the money i dont want it ither we have our own product site .. if my products would go towards giving money to charity then id do it untill then no
Reply to this comment
by Freedomstarfox July 16, 2009 7:33 PM PDT
This seems like a great idea since many developers already have a Donate button on their homepage anyway.
Reply to this comment
by aaasolanki July 18, 2009 12:56 AM PDT
---Nice idea. Developers could also offer paid & free versions for their add-ons, the former offering a lot more customization and features than the latter. That's exactly what one of my favorite extensions named Fireshot does.
---Yes, there is certainly a conflict between the Open Source/GNU Licensing nature of Firefox, its add-ons and the thought of people making money out of it. That's left to the 'fine print' makers. [:)] But yes, I certainly agree that developers need to be rewarded/paid for the time and effort that they spend developing and maintaining their add-ons.

Thanks,
Abhishek.
Reply to this comment
(21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Web Crawler

As the son of a Palm programmer, Josh Lowensohn grew up in a household full of technology. From a young age he was taking apart computers, finding hot new bulletin board systems, and re-programming video games. Josh currently covers the latest and greatest Web apps and services for CNET's Webware blog. Prior to that he covered news, and wrote reviews for GamersReports.com. For this blog Josh is exploring the latest Web apps and technologies, and trends in consumer entertainment devices.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Web Crawler topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right