October 9, 2009 3:48 PM PDT

In defense of fanboys

by Rafe Needleman
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 38 comments

I'm on the take. Microsoft pays my salary. I'm an Apple elitist. If you listen to the "fanboys," as tech product boosters are often called, you'll find that I've been accused, as have most tech writers, of all these things. Often in the same day. But the next day, you'll hear that I am biased against Microsoft, or maybe that I'm just not smart enough to appreciate the Mac.

Professional writers and bloggers, as well as people who write just for the fun of it on their own blogs, Facebook pages, and Twitter accounts, often find that it's difficult to say anything nice about a product without arousing the ire of people who think its competitor is obviously superior.

Those who have a critique of a popular tech product, company, or industry sector are similarly likely to bring out online crowds of people who band together to defend their technology against the dangerous opinion (and possibly the hidden, nefarious agenda) of a writer who clearly doesn't see the truth.

Guy Kawasaki: The original fanboy?

(Credit: Rafe Needleman/CNET)

Writers hate fanboys. We hate them because fanboys can take a reasonable argument and turn it into a screaming match. But we can love them too. There's a validation that comes from getting the fans riled up. If they're yelling, we must have said something worth yelling about. At least that's what our bosses tell us when a fanboy attack lays us low.

Plus, it's page views. The more people read and comment on our stories, the more money we make. A bad story can mean a short-term financial gain, even if it can damage a writer's, and a whole site's, long-term credibility.

But to say that we use and then dismiss fanboys doesn't adequately describe our relationship with them. Individuals fanboys may be intellectually unkempt, and in hordes as annoying as a swarm of gnats, but it pays to listen to them. Fanboys are important and valuable. Here's why:

Fanboys move businesses
Fan activism has a long history. It is, in a loud way, democracy in action. A fan letter-writing campaign saved "Star Trek" from being canceled after two seasons in 1968 (it was renewed for one more). In the modern era, after Apple removed the FireWire port for the 13-inch MacBooks, a fanboy yawp contributed to the reinstatement of this feature in the next revision of the product, now the MacBook Pro. Individuals may be singly annoying, but the collective voice of fans gets changes made--often quickly.

One can argue that even a lone fanboy can help a struggling company. Evangelists (as paid fanboys are called) like Guy Kawasaki at Apple and Robert Scoble at Microsoft have both helped the companies they worked for stay relevant and appear human, even when the tide seemed to be turning against them. (Kawasaki and Scoble are no longer affiliated with these companies.)

Fanboys keep us honest
On the Internet, anyone can say anything about anything, for free. If a writer gets something wrong about a popular tech product, a polite e-mail from a reader may alert him or her to the error. But the real learning--the unforgettable experience that ensures that the writer will never make that mistake, or anything like it, again--comes when a particularly biting fanboy (or an army of them) slams the writer in public for the error. It's humiliating, it's stupid, and it's why some writers are more careful than they would otherwise be.

I get slapped by fanboys myself. A recent example, from Andy Sternberg on Twitter: "@rafe may be the ultimate iPhone elitist, if yesterday's @buzzoutloud is any indication. [tweeted from my BlackBerry]."

This brief rant, against my sweeping dismissal, during a podcast, of the BlackBerry as a media platform, caused me to reconsider my position on the product. The writer was wrong that I'm an elitist but dead-right that I need to consider what I say about the product more carefully.

Fanboys create standards
People are joiners. They want to feel they belong. And fanboys are the clubs tech users can join. There's a practical advantage: If you use the same products and standards as the people you respect (or fear), you can get help using it from people who know how. Fanboys can set de facto standards of use and thus reduce training costs across the board for consumers. (There is, however, often a hazing ritual. You may have to live through being a new user, or "noob," while you get yourself up to speed.)

Fanboys can also thwart growth of their platform or product. Linux die-hards that continue to push that platform as a good product for end-user consumer desktop computers set unrealistic expectations. But even obnoxious and dismissive statements (like writing "Get a Mac!" in reply to a question or complaint about Windows) do raise awareness of the fanboy's pet platform.

Fanboys are fun (and profitable) to bait
Whenever traffic starts to lag for a blogger, he or she can just write something off-kilter about the Mac. Or Windows, Linux, the BlackBerry, the Xbox--name your hot button. Lob a few logic bombs into a story, and watch the hits roll in. It's not a good long-term strategy to build trust among the readers you want, but it is a quick way to make yourself feel important and turn pages in the process. Just please don't make a habit of it.

I conclude, therefore, that fanboys are good for technology, good for business, and good for the economy overall.

That still doesn't mean that I like them.

Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Rafe's Radar
Valley VC learns to embrace government
Reporters' Roundtable Podcast: Biggest tech stories of 2009
Dear newspapers: I will pay for your content, once
Blippy launches the Twitter of personal finance
Reporters' Roundtable Podcast: Google Chrome OS
How to fix Facebook's new privacy settings
Milo.com and Google Products search store shelves
Boxee Beta is cleaner, better, still closed
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (38 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Perry_Clease October 9, 2009 4:16 PM PDT
Have a great weekend, friend and foes alike :)
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk October 9, 2009 5:37 PM PDT
Amen.

(BTW - I get a kick out of folks who claim that the author of an article he or she is responding to is some sort of paid shill. Prone to mistakes or ideological maybe, but c'mon - the real astroturf action is down here* ;) ).

(* no, not me you freaks... I mean among us).
by cvaldes1831 October 9, 2009 4:43 PM PDT
Don't fanboys generate pageviews? You guys like pageviews, right?
Reply to this comment
by assman October 9, 2009 5:08 PM PDT
You didn't bother to read more than a couple sentences did you..
by Random_Walk October 10, 2009 12:07 PM PDT
assman is right - dude, he kinda said the exact same thing - it generates pageviews.
by myles taylor October 10, 2009 3:22 PM PDT
It bugs me when people comment on an article without actually reading it.
by nutbags October 9, 2009 4:59 PM PDT
Maybe I should write things about fanboys for the pageviews too...
Reply to this comment
by terminalblue October 9, 2009 4:59 PM PDT
fanboys are great for business, who else is goes to burger king enough to get ALL the star trek collectible glasses.
Reply to this comment
by assman October 9, 2009 5:11 PM PDT
Fan boys are annoying but the great thing about them is.. yeah nevermind they're just annoying.

Also Apple is for GAYS!! And M$FT is totally lamezors. And Linux users are pathetic virgin losers!
Reply to this comment
by Grem135 October 9, 2009 5:23 PM PDT
lol so in other words, dont use a computer?
by Perry_Clease October 9, 2009 5:27 PM PDT
Don't be an ass man! :)
by Grem135 October 9, 2009 5:32 PM PDT
No prob, I'm more of a breast man anyway
by terminalblue October 9, 2009 5:45 PM PDT
actually thats more of a troll.
by tektaktyks October 9, 2009 7:54 PM PDT
hehe
by donsms October 10, 2009 5:55 AM PDT
you might be on to something!
by Random_Walk October 10, 2009 12:08 PM PDT
Err, what's so wrong with someone being gay? They're human beings too.

(PS: put my vote in for leg+breast man).
by censorshipblows October 9, 2009 5:18 PM PDT
They're annoying and beyond stupid and they've absolutely ruined Cnet's comment section.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease October 9, 2009 5:28 PM PDT
Yes, CNET should censor their posts.
by Grem135 October 9, 2009 5:27 PM PDT
I accually enjoyed this artical..... maybe i should triple boot my AMD phenomII x4 945 with Win7, Ubuntu and OSX
would that make me a confused fanboy?
Reply to this comment
by WhuzYoDaddy October 9, 2009 6:48 PM PDT
I think any of those 3 choices would be fine - they all support spell checkers.
by Nicholas Buenk October 9, 2009 10:24 PM PDT
It would make you an AMD fanboy.
by dadsgravy October 9, 2009 5:45 PM PDT
Speaking of fanboys, I use a mac and my girlfriend uses a PC. We both swear by our choices. Anyway, we've been having premarital intercourse. We're both of legal age. My girlfriend was feeling bad about this and told her parents.

A couple of days ago the cops showed up at my door and arrested me. When I asked what I was being arrested for, they said, "unlawful entry of a retard".

I never should have gotten involved with a PC user.
Reply to this comment
by rquinn7 October 9, 2009 6:27 PM PDT
Funny. Thanks for the laugh.
by SlimGem October 9, 2009 9:10 PM PDT
Is it wrong to think that was hilarious? If so, I don't care.
by MPB October 10, 2009 2:17 AM PDT
HA HA HA HA! Lol yep watch out for those PC users their trouble. Lol
by Dalkorian October 13, 2009 10:36 AM PDT
You're lucky she didn't give you a virus. LOL.
by douggro October 9, 2009 7:43 PM PDT
If fanboys are now being legitimized, as Rafe suggests, then what of the ever-popular trolls? Trolls can do as much to keep the comment churn mill rolling as much as the fanboys. Makes one wonder if the trolls might not be operating as agents of hit-count generation, part of a cabal whose mission is to keep the readers coming back to witness the lambasting they receive.

That, or trolls are useless turds.

Yeah, that makes more sense.
Reply to this comment
by rafe October 9, 2009 7:59 PM PDT
Yeah, trolls are not fanboys. Different species entirely.
by ofmyony October 10, 2009 4:29 PM PDT
Next week from Rafe how trolls are good for page views
by tektaktyks October 9, 2009 7:58 PM PDT
:)
Reply to this comment
by October 9, 2009 8:40 PM PDT
hehheeh good article!

Because fanboys says it's the best money can buy,... I now have Mac! I now have Windows! and I now have Linux!

Because Google fanboys says google the best! I stick to google.com & Chrome for like, every day use! (it's actually good!) So good that I love the Chrome skins!

Because Fanboys says Canon the best, So I stick to Canon but fanboys said Nikon the better, I now found myself a new target to get a Nikon!

For worse or better, without fanboys... The economy wouldn't move.

Great Article!
Reply to this comment
by AluminumMonster October 9, 2009 9:16 PM PDT
OMG YOU ARE SUCH A FANBOY FANBOY RAWR!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by Nicholas Buenk October 9, 2009 10:22 PM PDT
Hail to the fanboys, I believe tech would be utterly boring if people had no passion for it.
Reply to this comment
by Chao_Sama October 10, 2009 7:23 AM PDT
Fanboys vs Trolls the battle that never ends......
Reply to this comment
by Mr_fleabite October 10, 2009 12:30 PM PDT
WOOOO Flame on.
by A41202813 October 10, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
No More Laptops For M$Z.
Reply to this comment
by dantynan October 12, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
hey, fanboys are great. without them we wouldn't have.... something, I'm not sure what. but it's important, I know that.

meanwhile, here's an up close and personal look at the ultimate microsoft fanboy: http://www.esarcasm.com/1218/oldest-living-microsoft-fanboy-tells-all/

tell me if you don't see something of yourselves here....

dt
Reply to this comment
by blackspyder1 October 12, 2009 6:30 AM PDT
Haha great article!
Reply to this comment
(38 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Rafe's Radar

Rafe Needleman has been reviewing technology products and businesses since 1988. Formerly editor-in-chief of Byte Magazine, and author of the Catch of the Day column for Red Herring, he's interviewed thousands of tech execs. For this blog he talks to entrepreneurs and start-up CEOs to explore the strategies behind new technologies.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Rafe's Radar topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right