• On TV.com: MAD MEN: You Say You Want a Revolution
July 10, 2009 2:43 PM PDT

The Google OS surfaced in March--or did it?

by Rafe Needleman

A look back at CNET's server logs reveals that someone gave us a quick hint of the Chrome OS back in March, by surfing to a CNET.com site while apparently using a browser running on the still-in-development operating system. On March 4, 2009, an unusual user agent entry was recorded on our servers. The key bits, just to beat this over the head, are in bold:

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020911 Google OS/ChromeKernel 0.9 (very secret, to be released soon.) Firefox/3.0.6

When browsers request data from Web servers, they send a user agent item that generally includes the name and version of the browser as well as the operating system. This data is used by most Web publishers for statistical purposes. Some sites also use it to deliver different content depending on which browser is being used; sites that have stripped-down smartphone-friendly versions use the user agent string to tell when they should deliver it instead of the full Web experience. It is also common practice for non-mainstream browsers to put "Mozilla" in their user agent strings so they get the standard Firefox version of the Web site.

The above user agent came to our servers in a Web page request referred to CNET.com from Google.fi, the Finnish version Google Search. Our logs tell us it came from a machine in Helsinki, and that the user turned three pages on CNET while looking for product and pricing information on Dell Poweredge servers. Tracking cookie logs tell us the user did not come back again until May 4th.

The user agent string has appeared only sporadically since then in CNET's logs.

We speculate now that the user was a Google employee in Finland, working on the OS, who neglected security briefly.

When we first saw this string, another staffer here at CNET wrote a note, "It smells more like some coder type with a sense of humor than a truly secret project." The same CNET employee noted that Google has monkeyed with user agents before, as reported in a 2008 Internet News story, "Does Google have a secret OS?"

You can see what user agent your browser is reporting at several sites, such as useragent.org. See also: "History of the browser user-agent string."

If you have access to your server logs, I'm sure other CNET readers would be curious to know if you've seen these hints about Google Chrome OS in your records. Leave a note below and share your findings.

Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Rafe's Radar
Reporters' Roundtable 9: The business of app stores
Personal services get business flavor: Xobni and SugarSync
BT's Ribbit releasing Google Voice competitor
Reporters' Roundtable 8: Future of the book
Let's kill the OS upgrade disc
Stalqer mobile social app finds friends in new ways
AARP aims to increase ranks through online app
Reporters' Roundtable 7: 'Dangers' of cloud computing
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by monkeyfun14 July 10, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
"If you have access to your server logs, I'm sure other CNET readers would be curious to know if you've seen these hints about Google Chrome OS in your records. Leave a note below and share your findings."

Hopefully they have their print screen button ready cause anyone can copy that string and say it visited their site.
Reply to this comment
by rafe July 10, 2009 3:08 PM PDT
That would be lame. Everyone: Honor system here, ok?
by Jonathan Monahan July 10, 2009 3:02 PM PDT
Funny they aren't using the Chrome browser.
Reply to this comment
by SteveMcQwark July 10, 2009 7:04 PM PDT
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/531.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.192.0 Safari/531.3

This is my user agent for Google Chrome. (the pre-alpha linux version). As mentioned in the article, it helps you get the standard page layout rather than an "unsupported browser" thing on many sites. For example, Gmail doesn't work in Konqueror (Where KHTML/WebKit originated, part of KDE) if you don't change to a Mozilla user agent.
by pcdude2143 July 10, 2009 3:19 PM PDT
I can change my User Agent String with a Firefox extension. This is probably a prank.
Reply to this comment
by SteveMcQwark July 10, 2009 7:13 PM PDT
Well, the fact that it says "very secret" is suspicious, but they nailed it on the ChromeKernel part and the Linux part. Still questioning the X11 part. Google's announcement said "...new windowing system...", which means replacing X11. Unless they meant window manager, though I doubt they'd make that mistake...

Maybe they just hadn't built their new windowing system yet, or they just didn't change that part for other reasons.
by cvaldes1831 July 10, 2009 3:21 PM PDT
Theoretically, this could just be the same GoogleOS that runs on tens of thousands of Linux boxes scattered around the world that Google uses for search indexing, right?

Or possibly one of the GSA (Google Search Appliance) machines, yes?
Reply to this comment
by ddhboy July 10, 2009 3:40 PM PDT
meh, ultimately GoogleOS is just another distro of linux, except with some semi-proprietary google code thrown in. To me, its more likely that some kid will come out of left field with his own linux distribution or what have you and revolutionize the game more than google could ever dream to do, I mean hell, that's how Google got started right?

And unless I see GoogleOS running on a crunchpad-like device, I don't see how its going to differ from say Ubuntu Netbook Remix, Moblin or that unofficial google linux distro.
Reply to this comment
by uzi69mm July 10, 2009 5:12 PM PDT
CNET, please to not be fooled... a simple perl program could that

use LWP::UserAgent;
use HTTP::Request::Common;
my $ua = new LWP::UserAgent();
$ua->agent("Godzilla/2012 the world ends [en] (Windows Null Technology 0.9e-9; U)");
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 July 10, 2009 6:49 PM PDT
Or in Safari, open up the Preferences menu, select the Advanced Tab, and check "Show Develop menu in menu bar." Restart browser.

Open up the new Develop menu, select User Agent then go to other. Type whatever you want into the text box, like this...

BooFar/6.9 (X11; U; Freax i686; en-US; rv:1.9.6.9) Lizard/2009071311 Booble OS/KernelSanders 6.9 (pesky wabbit tricks are for kids) Foxfire/3.0.8

Tada! Custom operating system! Running brand-new, ultra-secret web browser that sleuthy journalist has never heard about!
by FF2009 July 10, 2009 5:34 PM PDT
(Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020911 Google OS/ChromeKernel 0.9 (very secret, to be released soon.) Firefox/3.0.6 )


it's Linux baby, yeah, awesome :)
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 July 10, 2009 5:46 PM PDT
Damn your slow.
by opiapr July 10, 2009 5:55 PM PDT
I have Macs and Windows machines and while I don't be jumping on Chrome OS right away is always good to have strong competition. You see we will be using Vista for the next 6 years if it wasn't any Leopard competition around. Strong competition is good choices are even better. And their is no need to be a fanboy either when you can have the best of both (or 3 or 4 or whatever) words.
Reply to this comment
by SteveMcQwark July 10, 2009 7:21 PM PDT
Yeah, I have a dual boot with Kubuntu and Windows 7, and will likely try out Chrome OS. Though it would be neat if you could do what they're planning for Good OSes Cloud, which is boot your other operating system in the background while you're using your lightweight webOS. There'd have to be an automatic login though, like maybe Chrome OS borrows your accounts, and forwards your Chrome login to kdm/gdm when it starts... though by then, Ubuntu is planning to have really really fast boot-up (its already rivalling Windows 7), so there won't be much point...
by Silivrenion July 10, 2009 11:56 PM PDT
I think this news article is a breach of site privacy protocols. CNET should not be releasing browsing histories or times of viewers who visit their site, regardless of how relevant and interesting it is to the article.

The whole idea of you guys posting this information really leaves a bad taste.
Reply to this comment
by SteveMcQwark July 11, 2009 12:29 AM PDT
If they'd released his/her IP address, I'd be concerned. Releasing a user agent saying it originated in Helsinki isn't exactly violating anyone's privacy. The only information in your user agent is to help websites properly support your browser. It contains no personal information. Also, the user agent is quite certainly intended to be read. (very secret, to be released soon.) is of no use to any website.
by Silivrenion July 11, 2009 2:41 PM PDT
It's not the IP address I'm concerned about. They released browsing history information about what Google's looking into purchasing, as well as what days it was cited on. I think CNET would've actually been better off only saying it was from Google, but by releasing browsing history like they did, it makes you believe that anything you browse with or near CNET is susceptable to media coverage. I know I don't want my browsing history or related information to appear on CNET's next news article, and I'm sure Google didn't appreciate this one. This just has "bad move" written all over it.
by xhable July 11, 2009 1:34 AM PDT
*changes my user agent string to match* :p
Reply to this comment
by erictbar July 11, 2009 6:12 AM PDT
"Open up the new Develop menu, select User Agent then go to other. Type whatever you want into the text box, like this..."

Yes, that, or an equivalent in another browser, is what I first thought when I read the summary in the RSS feed for this article. I just copied and pasted that User Agent and am running this page with it now :P
Reply to this comment
by adamtheriault July 11, 2009 7:43 AM PDT
It might also be pointed out that Picassa got a rather sizable Linux update in October of last year. These things don't just pop up overnight.
Reply to this comment
by michaelcizmar July 11, 2009 10:29 AM PDT
@cvaldes1831
Google's Chrome OS is going to be targeted at desktops which has significantly different needs than the server farms they have. The appliances run a version of CentOS.
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 July 11, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
That's odd, I thought I read that Chrome OS would likely be deployed on netbooks first (which indeed are different that their server farms for search), not desktops.

Anyhow, this discussion is moot since we've agreed that user agent spoofing is kiddie play.
by HashimWarren July 13, 2009 6:10 AM PDT
Why reveal so much about this user's browsing? I feel like that is a lapse in privacy for CNET.
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Rafe's Radar

Rafe Needleman has been reviewing technology products and businesses since 1988. Formerly editor-in-chief of Byte Magazine, and author of the Catch of the Day column for Red Herring, he's interviewed thousands of tech execs. For this blog he talks to entrepreneurs and start-up CEOs to explore the strategies behind new technologies.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Rafe's Radar topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right