• On ZDNet: The Windows 7 upgrade survival guide
November 11, 2009 9:28 AM PST

Google lets parents lock in SafeSearch

by Larry Magid
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments
Share

Google's new SafeSearch page

(Credit: Google)

Google has long allowed parents a SafeSearch filtering setting that keeps kids from using the search engine to find inappropriate sites like those with explicit sexual images or text.

The problem was that kids could easily change those settings.

Starting Wednesday, however, the company is allowing parents to lock those settings to make it harder (though not impossible) for kids to bypass the settings.

To change the settings, the parent will have to log into his or her Google account and enter a password. Once the settings have been changed, the Google search engine will change in appearance to indicate that it's locked. The new page will have large balls in the upper right corner so that parents can see from across the room that their kids are on the safe search page.

The settings, which places a cookie on the machine, must be configured for each browser the child uses. If you set them only for Internet Explorer, for example, they won't restrict access from Firefox, Chrome, or other browsers. Also, according to a Google representative, the child can get around the settings by using the private browsing feature that is now built into the latest versions of Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Chrome. So, while this will keep kids from accidentally using Google for inappropriate searches, it will not deter tech-savvy kids who are determined to bypass the filters.

As I've said in other posts, filters are never a foolproof way to keep "tweens" and teenagers from inappropriate content. There are always ways to get around them, including using a different machine or mobile phone. Filters are effective for keeping young children from stumbling onto disturbing Web sites and they can be a deterrent to somewhat older kids who might have a momentary or casual interest in looking at material that their parents wish to block.

With all filters and controls, it's important for parents to think about how you use them to help teach your child to exercise self-control and critical thinking so that, eventually, they can safely use the Web without filters or adult supervision. Also, for very young children, say 5 and under, its remains a good idea to be with the child while he or she is online. Tools like Google's SafeSearch are helpful, but they are no substitute for close parental supervision, especially with young children.

Listen to Larry's interview about Google SafeSearch with Google's Scott Rubin

Larry Magid is a technology journalist and an Internet safety advocate. He's been writing and speaking about Internet safety since he wrote Internet safety guide "Child Safety on the Information Highway" in 1994. He is co-director of ConnectSafely.org, founder of SafeKids.com and SafeTeens.com, and a board member of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Larry's technology analysis and commentary can be heard on CBS News and CBS affiliates, and read on CBSNews.com. He also writes a personal-tech column for the San Jose Mercury News. You can e-mail Larry or follow him on Twitter @larrymagid.
Recent posts from Safe and Secure
Youth using phones to harass and spy on partners
Study: 'Digital abuse' hits half of youth
Facebook and MySpace delete N.Y. sex offenders
Tips for safe online shopping
McAfee warns about '12 Scams of Christmas'
Google lets parents lock in SafeSearch
A child porn-planting virus: Threat or bad defense?
Net safety conference to call for digital citizenship
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Super2online November 11, 2009 9:41 AM PST
I like the idea of showing large colored balls that can be seen from afar. This is a good first step on Googles part.
Reply to this comment
by Stormspace November 11, 2009 9:51 AM PST
I'd like it if they'd do it by IP so I can set it for all the PC's in the house. I've tried openDNS but it interferes with the wifes VPN...
Reply to this comment
by biffhenerson November 11, 2009 11:03 AM PST
Why would a good parent expose their children to the internet? It seems like some form of child abuse. If a parent purchased books on how to make bombs, and steal without getting caught, and also provided stacks of porn, some child and some adult, and some with animals and a nice thick stack of copies of term papers to cheat and call your own and gave them to their young daughter. Then lets throw in a camera and have her take some bad pictures of herself and share them with the boys gym teacher. How soon before the parent gets arrested and the kids taken away? Yet a parent can park a computer and webcam in the house and let the daughter surf the net freely and society seems to think thats its no big deal. Its educational. Why the double standard? Is that stuff bad or good? Im confused. Parents and the media are lazy and foolish on the topic of kids and the internet.
Reply to this comment
by JustSomeParent November 11, 2009 11:51 AM PST
I think that filtering software is a little outdated anyway. It seems that no matter how many times these questionable sites are blocked, there is another equally bad web site replacing it. It?s almost like a never ending battle between smut peddlers and filtering software. I gave up on that a few years ago and moved to monitoring software. I use Spector Pro and it works very well. It records everything my kids do and when I combine Spector Pro with routine open discussions with my children, I have found the online experience with my children to be much easier to understand what, and why they choose to do the things they do. Sure, they know I am watching them, but I share those recordings with them so they can object or disagree with what I am trying to teach my children.
Thanks
Reply to this comment
by dirkrandal1 November 11, 2009 9:33 PM PST
I would think that kids shouldn't be looking at large balls either. Come on, Google. That's just sick.
Reply to this comment
by Ergates_the_Ant November 12, 2009 7:21 AM PST
I think a better way to lock the safe search is to use K9 Web Protection. This will then apply to all users and all browsers on that computer.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Safe and Secure

As founder of SafeKids.com and co-director of ConnectSafely.org, Larry Magid has a special interest in Internet safety, including debunking myths like a predator behind every screen and messages like "be afraid, very afraid."

Add this feed to your online news reader

Safe and Secure topics

More on Safe and Secure
Larry's For the Record podcast
Safekids.com
Connectsafely.org
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right