• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
September 24, 2009 2:34 PM PDT

Water detected on the moon, buried ice on Mars

by William Harwood
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 14 comments

Data from a comet-bound NASA probe, a robotic mission to Saturn, and a U.S. instrument aboard an Indian spacecraft have provided clear evidence that at least trace amounts of water exist on the moon's surface, researchers said Thursday.

While scientists have long suspected that water ice from comet impacts is trapped in cold, permanently shadowed craters near the moon's poles, the new data indicates that water molecules form and dissipate across broader areas, even in lunar daylight.

Data from a NASA instrument aboard India's Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft show evidence of water molecules on the surface of the moon. Areas in blue show relatively high concentrations of water near the moon's poles.

(Credit: NASA)

While the data represent a major surprise and a "really profound discovery," one scientist said, researchers cautioned that the moon remains an extremely dry place, by human standards.

"The observations presented here show a combination of hydroxyl, OH (oxygen hydrogen molecules), and H2O (water) that resides in the upper few millimeters of the lunar surface," said Jim Green, director of NASA's Planetary Science Division. "The average amount of water reported, if we were to extract it, is about a quart of water per ton (of surface soil)."

To put it another way, he said, about 16 ounces of water might be present for every 1,000 pounds of surface soil near the moon's poles. For soil near the equator, only about two tablespoons of water is believed to be present in every 1,000 pounds.

"Even the driest deserts on the Earth have more water than are at the poles and the surfaces of the moon," Green said.

But scientists agreed that the results open a new chapter in humanity's understanding of the moon and the processes at work across the entire solar system that could lead to water formation on other airless asteroids and moons.

"Having any water or hydroxyl in the sunlit areas of the moon is as surprising as it is intriguing," Bruce Betts, director of projects for the Planetary Society, said in a statement. "Will such results turn out to be the tip of the iceberg, or will the moon remain a dry desert with slightly more moisture than we thought?"

On a related front, NASA unveiled new findings from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on Thursday that show clear evidence of huge subsurface ice sheets extending from the poles of the Red Planet halfway to its equator.

The buried ice was spotted in debris thrown up in five recent northern hemisphere impact craters. The ice is surprisingly pure and easy to see in high-resolution pictures from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

Scientists believe that the ice is a remnant of a more humid period in Mars' recent history, when the planet's polar ice caps extended much farther toward the equator.

A recent impact crater on Mars, showing bright ice thrown up from a subsurface layer.

(Credit: NASA)

"Every indication is that this is forming a broad, continuous sheet beneath the surface," said Ken Edgett, a camera team member with Malin Space Science Systems of San Diego. "We have five separate impact sites, all showing more or less the same thing.

"I'd say the volume of water--and this is a guess--the volume of water is probably comparable to the volume we would have in, say, the Greenland ice sheet on the Earth, in the buried ice deposits (and the North Pole ice cap)."

Shane Byrne, a member of the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment team at the University of Arizona, said the ice sheet is probably about a yard or so thick.

"These buried ice sheets that extend from the poles all the way down to 45 degrees or so (north and south latitude) don't quite cover half of the planet, but (they) come close," he said. "So we're talking about maybe a (half) million cubic kilometers of ice in total."

Water ice is a critical resource for future space travelers, as well as a requirement for the development of life as it is currently known. The presence of ice on Mars is not a surprise, although the purity and extent of the buried ice sheets is. Water on the moon, however, is another matter.

Three spacecraft--India's Chandrayaan-1 lunar orbiter, NASA's Saturn-bound Cassini probe, and the agency's Deep Impact comet mission--all detected evidence of water molecules on the moon's surface. In a surprise, it appears that water molecules are present, even in the heat of direct sunlight.

"Finding water on the moon in daylight is a huge surprise, even if it is only a small amount of water and only in the form of molecules stuck to soil," Jessica Sunshine, an astronomer at the University of Maryland who helped analyze data from NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft, said in a statement. "In the Deep Impact data, we're essentially watching water molecules form and then dissipate right in front of our eyes."

What causes the water to form is not yet clear, but Sunshine said the mechanism might involve electrically charged hydrogen ions in the solar wind interacting with oxygen-rich minerals in the lunar soil to form water and hydroxyl molecules.

"We aren't certain yet how this happens," she said, "but our findings suggest a solar-driven cycle in which layers of water only a few molecules thick form, dissipate, and reform on the surface each lunar day.

"This water is formed in the morning, substantially lost by lunar midday, and reformed as the lunar surface cools towards evening."

Finding water on the moon has long been one of the holy grails of modern lunar exploration because solar power and ice deposits, assuming they are close enough to the surface, could provide a source of water, air, and rocket fuel for future moon explorers or colonists.

The discoveries announced this week don't necessarily mean that abundant water supplies are available across the moon's surface--the solar-driven cycle implied by Deep Impact would produce only trace amounts--but they show that the moon isn't the totally dry place scientists long thought it was.

Earlier data indicated possible ice deposits in permanently shadowed craters near the moon's poles, where water from comet impacts could have been trapped over the moon's long history.

In June, NASA launched two new spacecraft to the moon, the $504 million Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and the $79 million Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, or Lcross.

Orbiting the moon at an altitude of just 31 miles, the LRO spacecraft is designed to map the lunar surface in unprecedented detail to help identify possible landing sites for future manned missions. Lcross is focused specifically on water.

If all goes well, the spent second stage of the rocket that boosted LRO and Lcross to the moon will crash into a permanently shadowed crater on October 9, blasting presumably ice-bearing soil into sunlight for direct analysis by LRO, the Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based observatories. Lcross will fly through the plume, beaming back data before it, too, crashes to the surface.

William Harwood has been covering the U.S. space program full-time since 1984, first as Cape Canaveral bureau chief for United Press International and now as a consultant for CBS News. He has covered more than 115 shuttle missions, every interplanetary flight since Voyager 2's flyby of Neptune, and scores of commercial and military launches. Based at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, Harwood is a devoted amateur astronomer and co-author of "Comm Check: The Final Flight of Shuttle Columbia." You can follow his frequent status updates at the CBSNews.com Space Place, where this story was first published.
Recent posts from The Space Shot
Atlantis astronaut's wife gives birth 220 miles below
Shuttle Atlantis completes smooth station linkup
U.S. and China agree to explore space cooperation
Shuttle Atlantis takes off on station delivery mission
NASA spacecraft confirms water ice deposits on moon
NASA hopes to free Mars rover from 'sand trap'
Astronauts prep for not-so-close encounter with space debris
Parachute failure only blemish in successful Ares test flight
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by t8 September 24, 2009 4:30 PM PDT
I wonder who will be first to bottle the water and sell it?
Reply to this comment
by subsider34 September 24, 2009 7:58 PM PDT
I'll make a fortune!
by zmjman08 September 24, 2009 4:39 PM PDT
Oh boy, the trillions of tax dollars that the government wastes on the space program suddenly seems worth it.

NOT.
Reply to this comment
by BelkyB September 24, 2009 5:00 PM PDT
@zmjman08

Are you still watching Wayne's World?

Space discoveries are far more important than your government and your tax dollars.

Get your head out of the "game" that you call life!
by SactoGuy018 September 24, 2009 7:51 PM PDT
The discovery of water on the Moon AND Mars is important for one reason: water is -critical- for human habitation, and water can be used to convert into liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen for rocket fuel, which means no need to lug fuel from Earth for the return flight to Earth from the Moon and Mars in the future.
by zmjman08 September 25, 2009 10:55 AM PDT
@sactoguy
so... the reason we fly there is so we can make fuel to fly back? That's a brilliant idea.
by Dalkorian September 25, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
@BelkyB, well how do you expect someone of that mental capacity to deal with such complicated issues as "Party on, Wayne!", "Party on, Garth!"? That one alone blew his/her mind for 5 years!
by garf26 September 24, 2009 6:30 PM PDT
zmjman: consider this--it only took 40 years for the human population to double from 3 billion in 1960 to 6 billion in 2000. We're projecting to hit 10 billion by 2050. At this rate of population growth, the earth does not have the resources to sustain us indefinitely. Colonization of the moon and Mars can no longer be considered science fiction, but necessary for our future survival. This type of preliminary research is necessary for that, regardless of the cost.
Reply to this comment
by Naimo5577 September 24, 2009 9:21 PM PDT
Yeah, right...going into space will save us from population generated crisis.
Even the most complex and difficult earth-bound problems are a billion times easier to solve (and less expensive) than doing 'anything' in space. The extra-terrestrial realm is the most profoundly difficult place to reach and sustain ourselves, and does not offer any form of refuge or escape.
The bottom line is, if we can't can't survive as a species on this magnificent planet oasis called Earth, we don't have a hope of meeting the challenges of the dessicated, irradiated, frozen, broiling and lifeless environments existing in our solar system and beyond. And with the nearest star to ours being four light years away, interstellar travel isn't an option either. By the time we have evolved technologically and socialy where we can reach or exceed the speed of light and actually navigate in that mode, we won't much resemble the combative, superstitious and misanthropic carbon blobs we are now.
by DigitalFrog September 25, 2009 10:08 AM PDT
Overpopulation is a weaker argument. I'd be more inclined to use the eggs in more than one basket argument.
by YankeePoodle September 25, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
Colonization of other planets is going to be true science fiction, but exploitation of resources is going to be a think in next 50 years or so.
by tektaktyks September 24, 2009 8:48 PM PDT
so if we find that in the past mars was booming with plant life who will claim the right to oil deposits there?
Reply to this comment
by nixermac September 25, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
US instruments on indian spacecraft? Did I read it right? Now the outsourcing has really become Out of this world sourcing. LOL. I Kid.

Well I am really glad to hear that US and India are collaborating. Science knows no borders and the progress made by the global intellectuals prove that we are all human beings and share a common cause for the advancement of the peoples and knowledge.
Reply to this comment
by kel333 October 11, 2009 2:59 PM PDT
the human race is doomed! if they were my tax dollars, i'd be pretty annoyed that they were being spent on some nerds idea of 'space exploration' ***?? Get real NASA, if you can't solve the problems on Earth, what on Earth are you doing trying to mine the moon? Seriously, i 100% totally agree with t8, most likely coca cola..
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

E-tailers linked to 'scam' blame customers

Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

About The Space Shot

Timely coverage of breaking space news, from shuttle operations and assembly of the International Space Station to planetary exploration, space science, and development of the next generation of manned spacecraft. You can follow Bill Harwood's frequent status updates at the CBSNews.com Space Place.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Space Shot topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right