• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
June 4, 2008 9:00 AM PDT

Yahoo opens address book interface

by Stephen Shankland

Fulfilling a second major part of its promise to make the internal workings of its Web site more extroverted, Yahoo is opening the interface for its address book for outside use.

The move could mean that Yahoo, struggling under business pressures but still a stronghold of Web activity, could become more tightly tied to others' Web services. For example, a programmer starting up a social networking site could use the interface to send invitations to a member's list of contacts stored at Yahoo.

Yahoo address book image

"Our address book has for a long time been one of the top things developers wanted access to," said Chris Yeh, head of the Yahoo Developer Network. That's because, over the years, Yahoo users have filled it with billions of individual records.

Yahoo users have stored more than 500 million address books, and the service is used by more than 150 million unique users each month, Yeh said. "A lot of our address books (are) constantly being updated. It's one of the biggest sources of contact information on the Web," he said.

Opening the address book API (application programming interface) is the second major step taken so far in executing the Yahoo Open Strategy that Chief Technology Officer Ari Balogh announced in April. The first step, in May, was opening the SearchMonkey project so outside coders could make more creative use of Yahoo search results.

"The address book is the second proof point. This year, we'll show proof point after proof point," Yeh said.

Yahoo Open Strategy is an attempt to link the company more with other Internet activities rather than remain a sealed-off, if sprawling, Internet domain. Through its open strategy, the company envisions outside programmers building Web applications on Yahoo's site, Yahoo services being incorporated into outside applications, and social connection information within Yahoo being used more widely.

Whether Yahoo will succeed in capturing developer attention and becoming a more dynamic part of new developments remains to be seen. A lot of action--some complementary but much of it competitive--also is taking place at rivals such as Facebook, Google, and any number of small Web 2.0 start-ups.

From the outside looking in
The address book move means outside Web sites will be able to read and write address book information--if a user grants permission through a Yahoo authorization process.

A site with a gift registry could piggyback on the address book so that a person could tell contacts about a wish list of presents, for example, Yeh said. Or a site shipping packages to others could auto-complete the address fields on a Web form.

(And something I'd like to see happen: somebody please endow the address book with an interface that doesn't look like it dates from 1998. I have a lot of contacts stored away in the Yahoo address book, and I find it excruciating to update addresses, scrub out obsolete e-mail addresses, or update mailing lists.)

Explicitly opening the service is more secure than one alternative today, in which a third-party site asks a user for Yahoo log-in credentials so it can access the site and scrape the contact information.

"There's no control over what happens after a user gives that (username and password). The third party could use it to log in to mail or any other part of Yahoo," Yeh said. "It's not a real secure method."

Yahoo isn't opening up the interface for an address book creation, though, which means it won't at least for now be usable as a generic back end for a Web site's address book needs.

Social graph theft?
One interesting possibility raised by the openness is whether an outside company might use it to steal, in effect, a user's social graph--the collection of connections each user often must laboriously reproduce as he or she joins a new site. Social graphs are a key asset of Web sites with a social element, in part because it's hard to reproduce them elsewhere. So once a user constructs one, there's a strong incentive to remain loyal to a site.

Yahoo isn't concerned about that, in part because opening the interface will mean other sites will be able not only to extract contact information from Yahoo, but also to synchronize changes on their sites back with Yahoo, Yeh said.

"I don't think we're worried about losing control over our social graph. All the things we're doing now are trying to break down some of the traditional walls Yahoo has had to the outside world," he said. "Yes, absolutely some of our data will get pulled out and be used for benefit of other systems. (But) when people use our system address book APIs, there's just as much a chance somebody will load something back into our network."

One company making use of the Yahoo address book interface is Plaxo, which hosts 40 million users' address books already.

Yahoo itself maintains multiple social graphs--for example, the address book, the Yahoo Messenger buddy lists, and the Flickr lists of contacts, friends, and family.

"Not all this data is combined yet," Yeh said, though one key part of Yahoo Open Strategy is to unify these contact lists and the related user profile pages. "The goal of the next half year is to make sure we bring that together."

The Yahoo address book is the "place we like people to store all their contact information," he said, but it's not a terribly rich social graph. For example, it doesn't currently have a good way to distinguish which contacts would be appropriate to invite to a new social service or to receive gift registry notifications.

"One of the things that we have to do is give users and opportunity to activate their social graph a little bit--essentially, to make sure they can classify the people they're most interested in communicating with on a regular basis so we know how to create a social environment around them," Yeh said.

"Going forward, we'll have to have a better solution for people so we can classify inside our address book who we're closest to and who are at further distance from us," he added. "That's a function of the social work we're doing."

Originally posted at News Blog
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Webware
Hundreds of Facebook groups hijacked
Plan your wedding with these Web resources
Twitter, LinkedIn team up for self-promotion free-for-all
'Elf Yourself' returns with Facebook and Twitter power
Sneak peek: Xobni e-mail app for BlackBerry
More time needed for revised Google Books deal
With AdMob, Google seeks mobile-ad advantage
Closing chapter of Google Books saga near
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by WeCanDoBIZ June 5, 2008 3:31 AM PDT
Whether these guys consider their APIs to be open or not, grabbing your contacts from any of the webmail providers, including LinkedIn, AOL and Yahoo!, has been a possibility for sometime. We do it on our own site.

For an example take a look at the below (you'll need to register):

https://www.wecando.biz/pilot/my_contacts.php?page=2

Any registered user to our site can display their contacts and send them mail from our site, with the contacts imported from any of the major webmail vendors. What they think they are announcing that's special or new I have no idea.

And I find the notion of social graphn "theft" curious given that surely the social graph belongs to the user who is thus entitled to use it how they wish.

Ian Hendry
WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
Reply to this comment
by Shankland June 10, 2008 7:13 AM PDT
Does the user really own his or her social graph? I think it's debatable. I agree that I "own" my list of contacts, but what about the next level out, my contacts' contacts? I don't own those. Quickly it becomes an exercise in collective ownership when looking at the value of interconnectedness. Whether that means Yahoo or some corporate entity that maintains the graph owns them is another matter, but I don't think I own my graph beyond the first level out.

For the record, Yahoo's Yeh said he believes the users own their social graphs: "We think the user owns the data, not Microsoft or Yahoo or Google."
Reply to this comment
by benjaminstraight July 28, 2008 3:42 AM PDT
This should make certain apps easier.
Reply to this comment
by Username8365 September 9, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
I wouldn't trust Yahoo! or Google to store the list of my contacts. The best solution I found is the Breesko Address Book. That's where I store my contacts and I know they are stored on my disk, so non of ad companies have access to that.
Reply to this comment
by WeCanDoBIZ October 8, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
I just wanted to update the link I mentioned above as it has changed since. You can now find our address book grabber which works with Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail, Google Mail and LinkedIn at

https://www.wecando.biz/my_contacts.php?page=2

It takes 30 seconds to register so you can see how it works.

Thanks all for your interest!

Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right