• On TV.com: Sexy summer bodies photo gallery
March 25, 2008 5:55 PM PDT

Agree2 creates binding legal documents that won't hold up in court

by Rafe Needleman

Update: Agree2 CEO Pelle Braendgaard takes issue with my argument about the quality of the agreements on his service. Read his rebuttal here.

Agree2 is one part great service and one part really scary idea. It allows users to create, collaborate on, and digitally sign binding legal agreements. But it does nothing to ensure that the agreements are legally sound.

Good part first: with this service, you can either create a new agreement from scratch, or use a template on the service, and easily define the fields (such as the parties in the agreement or the monetary value of it) that can then be filled out by all parties to it. The "signing" is legally binding, CEO Pelle Braendgaard says, even in beta, in part because the service gathers a ton of "evidence" about users' interactions with an agreement.

Agreements can be modified before they are signed, and the service makes sure that all parties agree to edits (or edits of edits) before the contract is finalized.

Agree2 lets you legally agree to contracts online.

Technically, I have no beef with the service. I think it's pretty cool, actually. But although I'm not a lawyer and even though I hate trying to decipher legal agreements when I need to, the service's tacit encouragement to create my own non-lawyer-approved agreements scares the bejeezus out of me. Sure, I could write an agreement between me and someone I'm hiring to rewire my house. And if the contractor I'm working with were new, he or she might even sign it. But it would still, probably, be a crappy agreement. A court might agree that the electronic edits and signatures were binding, but that doesn't mean the agreement would be legally sound. Certainly it wouldn't be complete.

If you want to strike a less-formal agreement with someone--say a scope of work in the office, or a chore schedule in your family--Agree2 looks like good solution. For more serious agreements, get a lawyer. You can use Agree2 to iron out the details and collect the signatures, but for Pete's sake don't skimp on counsel at the start.

The service presents a chain of evidence for all edits and agreements made.

Bonus tidbit: The company eats its own dogfood. The terms of service, which you must sign before using the site, is built in Agree2, and you can modify it before you sign.

See also: Mumboe (Under the Radar coverage).

Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Webware
Firefox 3.5 and the potential of Web typography
Sites that help you lodge complaints
Google App Engine misfires
Microsoft: Bing needs to improve when news breaks
Google finally sued by makers of Finally Fast
Google Toolbar for IE speaks your language
Bing brings out the tweets
Google Search optimized for a mess of phones
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right