• On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
July 10, 2009 5:06 PM PDT

Ten issues I have with Twitter (and its community)

by Don Reisinger

We all know and love Twitter, but it's not perfect. A few months ago, I used these pages to tell you what I liked about Twitter and what I didn't.

Since then, Twitter has undergone some major changes. It has enjoyed worldwide acclaim. It has a new design. And its community is bigger than ever.

All those things are great. But I'm not as happy with it as I could be. Unfortunately, I've found some issues with Twitter and its community that need to be addressed.

Five Twitter issues

1. The "more" has to go Say what you will about Twitter's new design, but sifting through the stream is too difficult. In the previous design, I was able to click the "next" button to get to older tweets. From there, I could quickly change the URL in the address bar to get to the page I wanted. For example, if I wanted to refer back to a tweet that, by now, was on page three, all I needed to do was change the "page=1" command to "page=3." Once it loaded, I was on the right page.

But in Twitter's new design, it requires me to keep hitting "more" to see tweets. It's a real annoyance. Quickly getting to the tweet I want to find takes too long. And although it makes the site more "Web 2.0," I don't like it. Bring back the "next" option, Twitter.

Twitter

No more more, please.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

2. Down times are back For a while, Twitter was on its game. There were so few down times, it seemed the Fail Whale was finally in the past. But as of late, I've noticed many more down times on the service. Almost each day, it's down for a minute or two at a time. It's not nearly as bad as it used to be, but it's still present. Down times have been a problem with Twitter since the beginning. They need to be averted.

3. Search still sucks Sorry, but Twitter Search doesn't even compare to some of the third-party apps available on the Web. I've used it on numerous occasions and each time, I'm left wanting more. So, I followed CNET Editor Rafe Needleman's advice and tried out Twazzup. It's more robust than Twitter's search. It helps me find results more quickly. Don't waste your time with Twitter Search. I don't.

Twitter Search

Twitter Search isn't as good as it could be.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

4. Security is a problem Although I've yet to be affected by a Twitter security problem, it's starting to become a concern. In the past six months alone, Twitter has been affected by several security flaws. Some have been worse than others, but considering many of them have something to do with phishing attacks and malware, they're all worth being worried about.

Twitter needs to enhance security. It's not nearly as secure as it should be. It might still the "place to be" if you're a social-networking fanatic, but it's also attracting malicious hackers. And that's not good.

5. It still doesn't have groups I know I've complained about this for as long as I can remember, but it's still a major issue I have with Twitter. I think groups could transform the experience. It would help bloggers target their readers more effectively, it could help celebrities form communities around their talents, and it would help companies communicate with employees. It just seems like the next logical step for the service and so far, it hasn't delivered. That's too bad.

Five Twitter community issues

1. Ditch the spammers In recent months, there has been a severe upswing in the number of spammers targeting Twitter. Every day, I see some portion of my stream invaded by spammers trying to get me to click on links to all kinds that bring me to fake products and schemes. It used to be an annoyance, but now, it's getting ridiculous. Something needs to be done.

2. Enough with the special days Although #FollowFriday is a favorite of some, I've found that many users are starting to come up with days of their own. Tune Thursday comes to mind. So does Wacky Wednesday, where one of my followers asked users to share a "wacky moment with everybody else." Ugh. Just stop. Please.

First off, alliteration isn't that cool. Secondly, we don't need special days. Let's just stick to talking about interesting stuff. It's so much cooler that way.

Twitter

Enough with all the special days.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

3. Following promises need to go I'm sick and tired of people who use their Twitter accounts to tell you how to add "1,000 followers in a single day!" First off, it ruins the Twitter experience. Secondly, most of those techniques require you to follow people who follow everyone else. For the most part, that means you'll be following people who will spam you. These scams need to be actively eradicated.

4. There's too much linkage I'll be the first to admit that I engage in too much linking. Every article I write goes to Twitter. But at the same time, I don't like the community's reliance on links. I realize that Twitter is a great way to get news and I know it's a place to share cool stuff. But at the same time, I do want to hear what people have to say. I'm following you for a reason--I want to know what you think. Tell me, instead of regurgitating a news headline and sending a link along.

Twitter

Twitter and all that tracking needs to go.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

5. We need more celebrities to care Although I applaud some celebrities (like Ashton Kutcher) who use Twitter as a platform to communicate with fans, there are still far too many celebs who use their assistants to do the tweeting. Yes, it's nice to know that you have a concert coming up, but let's hear what you think about it. We want to know what your life is like. We want to understand more about you. Using an assistant to update your stream won't do that.

Oh, and while you're at it, follow me on Twitter.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Recent posts from Webware
Google launches Maps tool for finding flu vaccine
Get a $10 Restaurant.com gift certificate for 80 cents
Hundreds of Facebook groups hijacked
Plan your wedding with these Web resources
Twitter, LinkedIn team up for self-promotion free-for-all
'Elf Yourself' returns with Facebook and Twitter power
Sneak peek: Xobni e-mail app for BlackBerry
More time needed for revised Google Books deal
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (65 Comments)
by ikramerica--2008 July 10, 2009 5:16 PM PDT
"We all know and love Twitter."

One of the most self important statements ever printed at c.net. "Because I love it, you all must too."

Some of us really don't give a darn about Twitter.
Reply to this comment
by mihal1 July 12, 2009 5:11 PM PDT
So why did you read to the article, let alone reply to it?
by myles taylor July 12, 2009 9:15 PM PDT
I agree with you there. I still don't get the obsession with Twitter. I've tried using it, as I consider myself a trendy person when it comes to technology, but I just can't get a grasp on it. I get spammers and people who don't understand the meaning of TMI. Twitter is full of bad and has very little good and I can't wait until all the hyped up people like Don wake up and realize that.
by ca5ter July 10, 2009 5:19 PM PDT
Twitter is for retards.
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 July 10, 2009 6:07 PM PDT
It's good for following the daily lives of pornstars.

Perhaps you're right...
by flickrz July 10, 2009 7:21 PM PDT
Very true. It is shown to be more useful than it actually is.
by cvaldes1831 July 10, 2009 9:56 PM PDT
I'd just like to clarify my point, so there's no confusion.

If there is any retard, it's me for following pornstars. The pornstars themselves are friggin' geniuses! They rock!

Ahahahahahaha!!!!
by wratbatblue July 11, 2009 5:41 AM PDT
OMG. People who still use the word "retards" are....retarded.
by SIGHUP July 11, 2009 7:24 AM PDT
@wratbatblue

Perhaps, but it made the beer I was drinking come out my nose when I read it.
by casademike July 11, 2009 8:13 AM PDT
That explains Don Reisinger's presence there then!
by paulej July 11, 2009 4:51 PM PDT
@wratbatblue, and just what is wrong with the word "retard"? Does it help if people use the word idiot, dumb***, or any other alternative? To say one ought not use "retard" is similar to arguing that one ought not use the word "gay" to mean "strange" -- a popular usage in my son's school (and apparently all over the US). Words are words and new meanings are introduced all the time. And, I surely hope you're not suggesting that the use of the word "retard" is somehow offensive like some people used to say about the word "crippled". I find no offense in any of those words, though obviously any person would be rightfully offended if they are called any of these words out of spite.
by posco2k8 July 11, 2009 8:57 PM PDT
@paulej

Yes, words have an impact. We're human beings, we cling on to words and define our entire world with language. So, if I say "gay" to mean "strange", that's ok? Doesn't that imply that being gay is strange?

That may not be the intention of all those high schoolers, but that's the effect it has whether you like it or not.
by Cynical_Writer July 12, 2009 1:48 PM PDT
@posco2k8

And if you say "gay" to mean "homosexual", doesn't that imply that all happy people are gay?

As paulej said, words are words and new meanings are introduced all the time.
by rafacst July 10, 2009 5:38 PM PDT
More celebrities on twitter?! Are you crazy?! Their servers wouldn't take the heat and the failwhale would show up a lot more.
Reply to this comment
by Sporlo July 10, 2009 6:01 PM PDT
Next time, read more closely: "We need more celebrities to CARE" as in have the celebrities themselves tweet, not assistants. It says nothing about the NUMBER of celebrities.
by afthought July 10, 2009 5:53 PM PDT
I twitter but really don't give a dam about twitter - it's like Facebook - it could disappear tomorrow and only be missed by people like the author who somehow gain a measure of delusional self-realization from superfluous, often supercilious, commentary. @afthought
Reply to this comment
by Tom Krazit July 10, 2009 6:22 PM PDT
Don Reisinger, January 9, 2009: "Why you should follow everyone who follows you on Twitter."

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10138918-2.html?tag=mncol
Reply to this comment
by terminalblue July 10, 2009 9:37 PM PDT
its never a good sign when the staff writers start pointing out Don's constant hypocrisies.
by Random_Walk July 11, 2009 10:42 AM PDT
LOL! Tom, dude... that was just harsh :)
by Inconnux July 13, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
LOL now thats funny :)

harsh but funny :)
by VultureTX July 10, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
Twits really are self important. a step beyond bloggers it seems.
Reply to this comment
by flickrz July 10, 2009 7:22 PM PDT
Twitter is actually a paradise for narcissists who think they are somehow more important and everyone should know what they are up to.
Reply to this comment
by Sam Papelbon July 10, 2009 11:26 PM PDT
just read your comment. thought you'd like to know.
by spencermustbeking July 10, 2009 7:24 PM PDT
This truly scares me. Perhaps I will consider deleting my profile...I already have several....unknown users..."following" me. Creepy!!!!
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 July 10, 2009 7:42 PM PDT
I don't even remember signing up for Twitter. I must have done so at some point. Yet I still get emails telling me somebody is following me. Yippee!
by cvaldes1831 July 10, 2009 9:26 PM PDT
Those are spammers, dude.
by ikramerica--2008 July 11, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
Uh, yeah, I get that. Considering I never signed up for twitter...
by SergeM256 July 11, 2009 2:04 PM PDT
At least they are not following you in a real world.
by PC72 July 10, 2009 7:33 PM PDT
Twitter: this year's Second Life.
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 July 10, 2009 9:34 PM PDT
It's hard to compare Twitter with Second Life.

In some cases it's worse than Second Life because people are tweeting about their actual mundane lives ("I'm at the Embarcardero BART station!") rather than creating some sort of fictitious, marginally entertaining scenario ("I take off my robe and wizard hat...").

In other cases, there's some actual content. These are either thoughtful, carefully composed posts, or brash, realtime snippets from some attention wh*re's life. Sometimes there's even news (or newslike gossip).
by Don Key July 10, 2009 7:51 PM PDT
I'm in the hate on Twitter crowd. I already have 7 other ways to annoy my friends with mundane updates of my life, I don't need another.
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 July 10, 2009 8:59 PM PDT
In using Twitter, there is absolutely no requirement for you to tweet. You can just listen if you want.
by cidman2001 July 10, 2009 8:14 PM PDT
I too think the whole thing is stupid. The fact that there are people out there who think it's important or relevant to receive celebrity Tweets is scary. Get a life! How does this add anything to your life? Are these folks somehow uplifted from the doldrums of their mundane life by a Tweet that some celebrity just arrived at the airport or whatever it is they're doing? Social networking gets stranger and less profitable every day.
Reply to this comment
by compbry15 July 10, 2009 8:42 PM PDT
I partly agree with most of the comments here.

1. Yes, using twitter to make updates like "making breakfast" and other mundane things is quite a waste of time and self-fulfilling. The thought that others really care about such petty little things is funny. However, I think there is a much more useful and reasonable use of Twitter. That is, using it to pose questions, post comments on a certain topic, and otherwise network with those with similar interests. Being a web professional myself, it is very useful to be able to follow other web professionals. I have a constant stream from some of the brightest minds in my field, as well as organizations such as @smashingmag who post regular links to interesting and useful topics. With a large network of followers I can ask questions regarding a web design or development problem and expect a thoughtful answer from people who know what they are talking about. The value in this is indisputable.

2. I really hate how celebrities are bringing Twitter into the forefront like they are. It used to be a smaller network of people using it for the "right" reasons, as described above, with less spam and idiots. Ashton's "race to 1,000,000" was just pathetic and I think really helped to put a negative light on twitter for people not in-the-know. Now, when you mention Twitter at a party or something, you are overwhelmed with things like "ugh, who cares when you are taking a ****" and such, and have to spend an eternity trying to explain to people who don't "get" technology that there are other useful uses for twitter other than what has become stereotypical.
Reply to this comment
by Resvon July 11, 2009 8:03 AM PDT
There used to be a thing called "newsgroups" where people of similar interests would gather, share useful topics and interesting links. And could do so in more than 140 characters. Wow. Revolutionary.

What did it lack? That's right - the narcissistic notion of "followers".
by Proud_Geek July 11, 2009 10:01 AM PDT
Wait, you mean no one cares when I am taking a **** ???
by ofmyony July 10, 2009 10:36 PM PDT
Twitter is great. It is a useful communication tool and I don't ever want to go back to just email or instant messaging. Each tool is great in one way or another, I am glad to have options.

Twitter Search is going through it's growing pains now, but I still find it useful. I see a lot of potential for Twitter Search but we need better spam filters.
Reply to this comment
by MSSlayer July 13, 2009 9:10 AM PDT
As others have mentioned newsgroups does the same stuff without the restrictions.
by vamman July 10, 2009 11:40 PM PDT
Don you never fail to make me laugh. Do you actually get paid to write this stuff? You have the worst journalism style I have ever seen. First of all I hate Twitter. Looks like most of the people that have read this article also hate twitter. Second of all, I think one of the main reasons Don's news article stink so badly, is because hes stuck on Twitter all day reading about celebrity Teenage girls (which this article seems to imply that Don wants more of!). Don get a life!
Reply to this comment
by cnetzimbo July 11, 2009 5:48 AM PDT
2. Down times are back
"Almost each day, it's down for a minute or two at a time."

Perhaps you're 'twittering' too much of your life away if this is a real problem for you.
Reply to this comment
by wratbatblue July 11, 2009 5:52 AM PDT
Twitter seems to be, in the cases of the "mundane" tweets so often mentioned in these comments, an outlet for people badly in need of entertainment but too busy or broke or socially awkward to get it in other forms. Wow! All it takes is for me to tweet "Going to Walmart", then "Got to Walmart", then "Entering Walmart", and suddenly it's possible that there are thousands of people, or maybe only my husband and boyfriend, who really give a care what I'm doing or thinking. The service also has legitimate uses, of course, since clever people will always find a way to vent their cleverness. Overall, it's an open forum, so one must accept the negative with the positive, or stop complaining and don't participate (or read about those who do).
Reply to this comment
by labanjohnson July 11, 2009 6:35 AM PDT
Quit yer *******. It's a free service, take it or leave it, or develop your own apps via the api to customize it to your tastes
Reply to this comment
by JJouni July 11, 2009 6:48 AM PDT
We all know and love Twitter,
You may love, but not we. We do not love any software, nor hardware. People and animals we love...
Maybe I did like the code I wrote early days,, but never loved. And will not love any s/w or h/w or suc!
JJ
Reply to this comment
by BtmnHatesRbn July 11, 2009 7:04 AM PDT
Don't have any gripes on Twitter, and I've read many good articles posted by people I follow or people who follow me. Strangely, this dart-board list of "problems" never happened to me, and I've been using the service for two years.

I think this is editorialism trying to be a news story when there's no news at all to cover.
Reply to this comment
by scottlholmes July 13, 2009 4:45 AM PDT
Groups of followers would be nice. I have moments when I want to learn about new techs and other moments when I want to be entertained. Having it all jumbled together is annoying.

As for spamming, it is not an issue for me. I never follow anyone automatically. If a follower profile indicates a spammer, I block them. If a follower's profile and recent tweets are interesting, they get a reciprocal follower.

I can easily read all the tweets from anybody without following them but usually I just dont have the desire to follow a celeb on Twitter. That's what Facebook is for.
by MSSlayer July 13, 2009 9:13 AM PDT
I think you don't know what an editorial is.

It obviously is one, at least to thinking people.
by fjpoblam July 11, 2009 7:16 AM PDT
My favorite gripe is still, celebs who either (1) post inane tweets including linkages to articles in their area of "expertise" every three seconds...filling up my wall, or (2) post at a reasonable rate, say once per three hours or so, but NEVER respond to @ replies even though THEY HAVE FOLLOWED YOU.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (65 Comments)
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right