What will Google's Chrome OS watch you do?
Google has a long history of tracking user activity, and the introduction of its Chrome operating system later this year is sure to follow suit. While we know that it's being built off of Linux, one big thing we don't know is how its terms of service will differ from those found in other Google products, and what kinds of user data it will be collecting. Based on the company's track record of watching and monetizing user data, it could be anything from which applications you're using, to all the information that's coming in and out of your computer.
To provide a better picture on what to expect, let's take a look at some of the ways Google is currently monitoring user activity in a handful of its products and how that may trickle down into the OS:
Google personalized Web search--Google's bread and butter business is its search engine, and its personalized search is a way to put a face on the data. When you're signed in with your Google account you can opt in to having your Web history tracked; Google archives all of the sites you've clicked on from search results, as well as what time of day you clicked on them.
For those who are not signed in, the company uses identifiers like cookies and IP addresses. But when you're signed in it can actually aggregate that data no matter what computer you're on. With a system-level log-in, it could theoretically do this no matter what browser you're using, giving Google a far richer set of data.
Chrome browser--When Chrome was first released, Google got in some hot water over its terms of service, which stated that Google had the rights to license any content that went through the browser. It quickly backtracked on the claim, citing that the terms heavily borrowed from other Google products and that it didn't make sense for Chrome. This would have given Google licensing control over things like user photos, videos, and words.
The one area where Google's Chrome can still access some of that information is with its reports system. This is an opt-in program for users to provide Google with crash reports and detailed information about what features they're using. Google has said this does not include any information from form fields, or from users' Google accounts. However, it does track what sites and search terms you've entered into the address bar.
Gmail--Google's Web mail service was one of the first Web mail services to provide contextual advertising, meaning it actually goes through your e-mail messages to give you advertisements that match up with a conversation you're having. Did you mention skiing in that last e-mail? Don't be surprised if you start seeing ads for local lift tickets or a new pair of ski boots.
Gmail also tracks what features users are using, including which settings are turned on and off, the themes they've chosen, and which ads they're clicking on. On the flip side, it does not share personal information with third parties; the only thing it gives to advertisers are the metrics on how many times their ads have been clicked.
Google Desktop--Google Desktop is sure to be a part of the Chrome OS. This software indexes all the content on your computer and makes it able to be searched and sorted, sometimes including Web search results from Google. It also indexes Web history, chats, e-mails, and information about your computer like what operating system you're using and the hardware configuration.
As far as usage goes, it can track which sites you're visiting in order to serve up personalized news. The software also has an opt-in "improvement" service that tracks crash reports, how many searches users are doing, and how long the software takes to pull them up.
Considering Google desktop is currently add-on software for Windows, Mac, and Linux (the latter of which the Chrome OS is being built off of), it will likely be more deeply integrated, and possibly something you cannot disable.
Google Checkout--Checkout is Google's online payment service. It lets customers pay for items using credit cards or bank accounts that are tied to their Google credentials. As far as collecting information goes, Google holds all of a customer's financial information on its servers including name, address, and account numbers. It also tracks how quickly they type in that information when making purchases, which account they used to pay for the good, and what that good was, giving the company a broad overview of a particular customer's purchasing habits.
For years Google has struggled to gain marketshare on incumbent PayPal, which has offered a similar Web payment system since the late 1990s. One area where PayPal has not ventured though is to the desktop. Google could easily ingrain Checkout into the OS, allowing users to make payments inside Chrome OS software, or to purchase applications in a similar fashion to how Apple has done it on the iPhone with its own app store.
Google Maps/Location--Google Maps and its related location-based services are one of the highest areas of interest for privacy advocates. Google Maps' Street View service provides 3D, street-level imagery of streets around the world, which is taken by camera-equipped vans that take photos of people and buildings. When Google rolled out its Street View service, faces were not blurred, however Google caved to privacy advocates and began doing so in early 2008.
The service can also locate where users are by obtaining information about what Wi-Fi routers or cell towers they're using to connect to the Web. This may be a standard part of the Chrome OS SDK, allowing applications that run on it to determine a user's location for various geographically-specific features. Many mobile applications are already doing this, including Evernote, which tags where each user note was created.
What to expect
Layers of data sharing. It's safe to assume that there will be many built-in ways to "share" some or all of your personal information with Google. Where the company's approach may differ from its other Web products is that it can get a far broader sense of what you're doing off its own properties, and even when offline.
Google typically has an all-or-nothing approach when it comes to what types of personal data it can harvest. When it comes to operating systems, however, a lot more of that information is localized. Google may offer a way to select certain parts of your application library, or hard disk that cannot be indexed or tracked in a similar fashion to what it does with its desktop search program.
Lots of toggles. To manage all these security and privacy options in one place it's likely there will be an extensive settings panel that lets users track what they are and are not sharing. Google may go so far as to make this more transparent with some sort of task bar that lets you change it on the fly, just like it's done with its privacy mode in the Chrome browser. Just imagine being able to open and use certain applications without the OS keeping track of you ever using them, the same way it treats visiting certain sites.
A deep usage tracking and reporting system. One of the most exciting (or potentially creepy) parts of this will be Google's approach to tracking how users are interacting with its OS. The company spends a considerable amount of time and resources on tracking user experience on its sites both with extended betas, and internal research studies. Having that same kind of tracking system baked into the OS can give Google a very simple way to see what's working and what's not.
As such, Google is likely to take a more extensive approach than Microsoft, which has a more limited system for tracking user activity on Windows. Users can opt in to a "customer experience improvement program" for Office, while Windows users have the option of sending information to Microsoft when applications or the entire operating system crashes. Google could go as far as keeping track of how long you keep your machine running at a time, or what times of day you use certain applications in order to create battery-saving hardware profiles.
More details about the Chrome OS, including privacy and licensing information are likely to be unveiled later this year when Google makes the code available as open source.
Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh. 



http://www.nowpublic.com/ex_agent_cia_seed_money_helped_launch_google
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/060906spyon.htm
What I would expect is there would be a replacement of Google Desktop ("Cloudtop"?). That would then be used to search all of your cloud-based data repositories for whatever you're looking for. Wow, now that's interesting and scary at the same time.
They also guarantee the data is only beign accessed by crawling mechanisms. Also, they really protect privacy as they do not share data with government. Brazilian law police tryied to get data from Orkut to watch criminals and criminal acts and Google denied to protect user privacy, only prividing after long law process to have a tool to search all orkut, again respecting user`s privacy.
As a consequence of data gathering, they provide very good service. I bet you use Google and like it, but you`re still complaining about their policies. Why don`t you use bing and maybe they access your PC throw ActiveX and install another MS app without even asking for confirmation. Now that`s a privacy breakng way to act...
I remember when everybody was really afraid of using Gmail and up untill the moment we never heard of a violation or any case of e-mail leaking, so I guess you should put a bit of trust on it and always use https (some e-mail clients do not even provide it, only in authentication!).
Cheers,
Lucas Arruda
Google's motto of 'do no evil' is hollow joke.
Why is Google successful? Too many people ignorant of a very old truth: there is NO free lunch. Period.
Personally i wouldn't care, especially if it still the same old targeted advertising i love.
If you read a previous post by me, i would rather have ads targeted at my interests than have them randomly throw up things i dislike or outright hate.
No thanks Google. I like your Search engine and Gmail account, but that's as far as i will go with you.
See for yourself:
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/
Yeah, everyone wants all their phone calls monitored and recorded. The same stupid people who were all over the government taping will be signing up for Google services without an care in the world.
Google is already very fat target for hackers, all these new services make them even more of a target since they store everything forever.
Casual usage is good, but business wants a head to roll when things don't go right.
As to what will come of it, time will tell. But there are responses to Google's product offerings.
One example is SRWare Iron, basically a 'gutted' version of Chrome. They took the browser and ripped out ALL of the tracking elements. The result: a stable [so far...], fast, simple version of Chrome.
If Google wants to release an OS, that's their business. And if somebody wants to mod their product, so be it.
Open source is what it is, for good or ill.
If there is one company in computing that could possibly compete with M$ it's, Google. This doesn't surprise me at all. There is little need for the desktop as most of consumer computing is done online and within applications. Here in is the rub ............... based on Linux perhaps in time, from this jumping off point they will develop there own software. Watch as M$'s market share shrinks and shrinks. It is possible their monopoly is near an end and their dynasty maybe coming to a close.This stone maybe kill two birds in one throw shrink M$ and perhaps replace that terribly OS called Linux, both being beneficial for consumers.
- by uabassguy July 10, 2009 10:40 PM PDT
- Personally, I have nothing to hide, so I could care less about privacy. In any event, it's linux, things can be blocked from a root level if one was so inclined. My opinion may be biased, though. Because when it comes to the bigger monster, M$ has and will always take the cake, and eat it too. If Google can bring open source to a larger community, I welcome it.
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- by blusky08 July 11, 2009 1:48 PM PDT
- No offense intended, but the relinquishing of privacy based on the "nothing to hide" argument is counter to everything that the USA stands for. Read the founding fathers--and not just the toned down, sanitized version about them. And let's not forget this lesson from world history: Whether or not you have nothing to hide or whether or not you are defined as a criminal all depends on who is making the rules and setting the definitions.
-
-
- by zyxxy July 24, 2009 7:59 AM PDT
- You have nothing to hide today, but some of what you are doing today may indicate criminal intent twenty years from now. Rules and rulers change. As blusky08 says, read John Adams, read Thomas Jefferson. Each would have been charged with treason if the colonies had lost the revolution. Each would have hung. Their views were radical in 1775 and their views are still radical today. Thomas Jefferson felt that revolution was required on a periodic basis in order to refresh The Republic.
-
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (38 Comments)