• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
July 8, 2009 1:08 PM PDT

What will Google's Chrome OS watch you do?

by Josh Lowensohn

Google has a long history of tracking user activity, and the introduction of its Chrome operating system later this year is sure to follow suit. While we know that it's being built off of Linux, one big thing we don't know is how its terms of service will differ from those found in other Google products, and what kinds of user data it will be collecting. Based on the company's track record of watching and monetizing user data, it could be anything from which applications you're using, to all the information that's coming in and out of your computer.

To provide a better picture on what to expect, let's take a look at some of the ways Google is currently monitoring user activity in a handful of its products and how that may trickle down into the OS:

Google personalized Web search--Google's bread and butter business is its search engine, and its personalized search is a way to put a face on the data. When you're signed in with your Google account you can opt in to having your Web history tracked; Google archives all of the sites you've clicked on from search results, as well as what time of day you clicked on them.

For those who are not signed in, the company uses identifiers like cookies and IP addresses. But when you're signed in it can actually aggregate that data no matter what computer you're on. With a system-level log-in, it could theoretically do this no matter what browser you're using, giving Google a far richer set of data.

Chrome browser--When Chrome was first released, Google got in some hot water over its terms of service, which stated that Google had the rights to license any content that went through the browser. It quickly backtracked on the claim, citing that the terms heavily borrowed from other Google products and that it didn't make sense for Chrome. This would have given Google licensing control over things like user photos, videos, and words.

The one area where Google's Chrome can still access some of that information is with its reports system. This is an opt-in program for users to provide Google with crash reports and detailed information about what features they're using. Google has said this does not include any information from form fields, or from users' Google accounts. However, it does track what sites and search terms you've entered into the address bar.

Gmail--Google's Web mail service was one of the first Web mail services to provide contextual advertising, meaning it actually goes through your e-mail messages to give you advertisements that match up with a conversation you're having. Did you mention skiing in that last e-mail? Don't be surprised if you start seeing ads for local lift tickets or a new pair of ski boots.

Gmail also tracks what features users are using, including which settings are turned on and off, the themes they've chosen, and which ads they're clicking on. On the flip side, it does not share personal information with third parties; the only thing it gives to advertisers are the metrics on how many times their ads have been clicked.

Google Desktop--Google Desktop is sure to be a part of the Chrome OS. This software indexes all the content on your computer and makes it able to be searched and sorted, sometimes including Web search results from Google. It also indexes Web history, chats, e-mails, and information about your computer like what operating system you're using and the hardware configuration.

As far as usage goes, it can track which sites you're visiting in order to serve up personalized news. The software also has an opt-in "improvement" service that tracks crash reports, how many searches users are doing, and how long the software takes to pull them up.

Considering Google desktop is currently add-on software for Windows, Mac, and Linux (the latter of which the Chrome OS is being built off of), it will likely be more deeply integrated, and possibly something you cannot disable.

Google Checkout--Checkout is Google's online payment service. It lets customers pay for items using credit cards or bank accounts that are tied to their Google credentials. As far as collecting information goes, Google holds all of a customer's financial information on its servers including name, address, and account numbers. It also tracks how quickly they type in that information when making purchases, which account they used to pay for the good, and what that good was, giving the company a broad overview of a particular customer's purchasing habits.

For years Google has struggled to gain marketshare on incumbent PayPal, which has offered a similar Web payment system since the late 1990s. One area where PayPal has not ventured though is to the desktop. Google could easily ingrain Checkout into the OS, allowing users to make payments inside Chrome OS software, or to purchase applications in a similar fashion to how Apple has done it on the iPhone with its own app store.

Google Maps/Location--Google Maps and its related location-based services are one of the highest areas of interest for privacy advocates. Google Maps' Street View service provides 3D, street-level imagery of streets around the world, which is taken by camera-equipped vans that take photos of people and buildings. When Google rolled out its Street View service, faces were not blurred, however Google caved to privacy advocates and began doing so in early 2008.

The service can also locate where users are by obtaining information about what Wi-Fi routers or cell towers they're using to connect to the Web. This may be a standard part of the Chrome OS SDK, allowing applications that run on it to determine a user's location for various geographically-specific features. Many mobile applications are already doing this, including Evernote, which tags where each user note was created.


What to expect

Layers of data sharing. It's safe to assume that there will be many built-in ways to "share" some or all of your personal information with Google. Where the company's approach may differ from its other Web products is that it can get a far broader sense of what you're doing off its own properties, and even when offline.

Google typically has an all-or-nothing approach when it comes to what types of personal data it can harvest. When it comes to operating systems, however, a lot more of that information is localized. Google may offer a way to select certain parts of your application library, or hard disk that cannot be indexed or tracked in a similar fashion to what it does with its desktop search program.

Lots of toggles. To manage all these security and privacy options in one place it's likely there will be an extensive settings panel that lets users track what they are and are not sharing. Google may go so far as to make this more transparent with some sort of task bar that lets you change it on the fly, just like it's done with its privacy mode in the Chrome browser. Just imagine being able to open and use certain applications without the OS keeping track of you ever using them, the same way it treats visiting certain sites.

A deep usage tracking and reporting system. One of the most exciting (or potentially creepy) parts of this will be Google's approach to tracking how users are interacting with its OS. The company spends a considerable amount of time and resources on tracking user experience on its sites both with extended betas, and internal research studies. Having that same kind of tracking system baked into the OS can give Google a very simple way to see what's working and what's not.

As such, Google is likely to take a more extensive approach than Microsoft, which has a more limited system for tracking user activity on Windows. Users can opt in to a "customer experience improvement program" for Office, while Windows users have the option of sending information to Microsoft when applications or the entire operating system crashes. Google could go as far as keeping track of how long you keep your machine running at a time, or what times of day you use certain applications in order to create battery-saving hardware profiles.

More details about the Chrome OS, including privacy and licensing information are likely to be unveiled later this year when Google makes the code available as open source.

Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Recent posts from Webware
Closing chapter of Google Books saga near
Google to acquire AdMob for $750 million
After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges
Review redux: Flixster movie app for BlackBerry
Popular iPhone movie app flops on BlackBerry
Opera Mobile 10 beta browser: First Look video
Google trying not to cross 'the creepy line'
Integrated retweet on its way to Twitter
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (38 Comments)
by rogerpack2005 July 8, 2009 1:33 PM PDT
google's bread and butter is adwords, I believe
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 July 9, 2009 7:57 AM PDT
Okay, take this for what you will. There have been many rumours about the true intent of Google's unprecedented policies and technology for mining data on people. It does give one pause to at least consider the possibility that the accusations about Google's true founding and purpose have roots within the intelligence community. Here are two of many articles documenting this:

http://www.nowpublic.com/ex_agent_cia_seed_money_helped_launch_google
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/060906spyon.htm
by paulej July 8, 2009 2:04 PM PDT
Having my head buried in work all day, this was the first article I saw on this topic. But, why would an OS designed around a browser -- effectively making it nothing more than an Internet access device -- even need something like Google Desktop? Would there even be a "desktop"?

What I would expect is there would be a replacement of Google Desktop ("Cloudtop"?). That would then be used to search all of your cloud-based data repositories for whatever you're looking for. Wow, now that's interesting and scary at the same time.
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn July 8, 2009 3:50 PM PDT
I think you're onto something there. I just can't imagine the Chrome OS not having a way to save some files locally. And if so, not including its product that lets you sort through them.
by lucasarruda July 8, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
Google Chrome asks if you want to share browsing data that is being gathered for helping browsing experience, so you don`t have to accept it if you don`t agree.
They also guarantee the data is only beign accessed by crawling mechanisms. Also, they really protect privacy as they do not share data with government. Brazilian law police tryied to get data from Orkut to watch criminals and criminal acts and Google denied to protect user privacy, only prividing after long law process to have a tool to search all orkut, again respecting user`s privacy.

As a consequence of data gathering, they provide very good service. I bet you use Google and like it, but you`re still complaining about their policies. Why don`t you use bing and maybe they access your PC throw ActiveX and install another MS app without even asking for confirmation. Now that`s a privacy breakng way to act...

I remember when everybody was really afraid of using Gmail and up untill the moment we never heard of a violation or any case of e-mail leaking, so I guess you should put a bit of trust on it and always use https (some e-mail clients do not even provide it, only in authentication!).

Cheers,
Lucas Arruda
Reply to this comment
by Ironwolfx July 9, 2009 7:00 AM PDT
As true as your facts may be, there are some Chinese democracy activists who aren't quite as sanguine about Google's 'benevolence'. They had a choice: freedom or 'market share', they chose $$$$$ over 'human rights'.

Google's motto of 'do no evil' is hollow joke.

Why is Google successful? Too many people ignorant of a very old truth: there is NO free lunch. Period.
by Hunnter2k3 July 8, 2009 2:36 PM PDT
Considering this is Linux, and i HIGHLY doubt they will completely lock you out from using the core OS if you wanted to, wouldn't it be fairly trivial to monitor network activity and block it?

Personally i wouldn't care, especially if it still the same old targeted advertising i love.
If you read a previous post by me, i would rather have ads targeted at my interests than have them randomly throw up things i dislike or outright hate.
Reply to this comment
by FF2009 July 8, 2009 2:42 PM PDT
This is exactly what GoogleOS will do...nothing but track it's users browsing habits and feed you with it's content.

No thanks Google. I like your Search engine and Gmail account, but that's as far as i will go with you.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk July 8, 2009 3:05 PM PDT
LOL! This reminds me of the big fat "NSA Key" brouhaha that Microsoft had to put up with in Windows NT, ME, and 2000...

See for yourself:
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/
Reply to this comment
by kuraimauri July 8, 2009 3:30 PM PDT
I prefer to have my personal data and execute my applications on my desktop where I have control over them. so, I have to say: no thanks, big brother google.
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn July 8, 2009 3:51 PM PDT
On the flip side, since you're not paying for a Windows License you may simply be able to roll your own OS on there after you buy a machine with it pre-installed.
by davep_f1 July 8, 2009 3:37 PM PDT
Google is "The Evil", I hate it
Reply to this comment
by DrKevorkian July 9, 2009 1:34 AM PDT
I agree totally with you, Google is the real "Big Brother" and I do not use anything they offer. Also, Jason did not detail the new Google Phone that they intend to rollout where all of the conversations are transcribed and stored.

Yeah, everyone wants all their phone calls monitored and recorded. The same stupid people who were all over the government taping will be signing up for Google services without an care in the world.

Google is already very fat target for hackers, all these new services make them even more of a target since they store everything forever.
by DrKevorkian July 9, 2009 1:38 AM PDT
Whoops, I meant Josh instead of Jason.
by simonjoker July 8, 2009 5:19 PM PDT
http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/02/22/google-in-bed-with-us-intelligence/
Reply to this comment
by rgor July 9, 2009 5:39 AM PDT
The real issue is corporations and closed networks. How does Google convince a closed system that their web based applications can achieve the same level of ownership, customization, and accountability? You may be able to run a calculator online but running major applications will be limited to the desktop. The third issue is the web. If you don't have internet access, what happens to your work? Local applications will never go away. In fact, I would venture that Google will eventually HAVE to local self contained installs to compete in the corporate world. All it takes is a couple of internet leaks, attacks, or privacy issues to surface and the whole stack of cards will fall. The key factor here is how much of what you do should be done through google and to what extent do you trust them?
Casual usage is good, but business wants a head to roll when things don't go right.
Reply to this comment
by OldGrumpy July 9, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
If its OS is as frustrating to use as I found Google's browser Chrome to be, it won't be going anywhere; it will be dead on arrival.
Reply to this comment
by wieser100 July 9, 2009 7:00 AM PDT
Google is going to fall flat on its face on this one. i doubt any computer makers are going to offer it installed on a new computer,so there goes most of the chances to get new users plus it will be useless for anyone who games because there wont be any games for it ,just like all the other linux distros.Plus who is going to fool around with a brand new operating system when we dont have any indication of how good it is and there are lots of other Linux distros that wont have Google tracking your every move.This cloud computing crap will just add more layers of stuff to go wrong,not only your computer but the net and someone elses machines that you don't have any control over!!What happens when net goes down.Construction work ers accidently tearing up lines anyone
Reply to this comment
by lavern July 9, 2009 7:36 AM PDT
This will be about as useful as google docs....what a gem that is
Reply to this comment
by Ironwolfx July 9, 2009 7:37 AM PDT
Not content with peeking over your shoulder, Google wants you sit on their lap. No thanks.

As to what will come of it, time will tell. But there are responses to Google's product offerings.

One example is SRWare Iron, basically a 'gutted' version of Chrome. They took the browser and ripped out ALL of the tracking elements. The result: a stable [so far...], fast, simple version of Chrome.

If Google wants to release an OS, that's their business. And if somebody wants to mod their product, so be it.

Open source is what it is, for good or ill.
Reply to this comment
by jjuujj July 9, 2009 9:05 AM PDT
Big Brother in sheep's clothing, I think..........
Reply to this comment
by joshdeboer July 11, 2009 1:55 PM PDT
Well said!
by DMBoricua July 9, 2009 12:31 PM PDT
Sure Google keeps track of the websites you visit, the private information you input on pages, the keys you type, when, where, what, why, how, but its for the benefit of Google to know what its users do to help them improve their software and such. I'm sure they would never use your private information against you or track you down for using their software excessively, just use Google products like any other. Its nothing bad.
Reply to this comment
by Dango517 July 10, 2009 4:08 AM PDT
Bingo! M$'s contender has arrived.

If there is one company in computing that could possibly compete with M$ it's, Google. This doesn't surprise me at all. There is little need for the desktop as most of consumer computing is done online and within applications. Here in is the rub ............... based on Linux perhaps in time, from this jumping off point they will develop there own software. Watch as M$'s market share shrinks and shrinks. It is possible their monopoly is near an end and their dynasty maybe coming to a close.This stone maybe kill two birds in one throw shrink M$ and perhaps replace that terribly OS called Linux, both being beneficial for consumers.
Reply to this comment
by Lucky___D July 10, 2009 8:54 AM PDT
I'm annoyed by google's data collection. I downloaded chrome and since I'm stuck with this spyware that only spybot S&D seems to be able to detect but can't flush out. How much personal data is being collected and who has access to it ? It bothers me not being able to decide who I can share or not datas with and seriously makes me reconsider using any google products at all.
Reply to this comment
by FF2009 July 10, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
Good luck getting rid of it. It's imposable! You need to reformat your hard drive.
by fidoogle July 10, 2009 10:13 AM PDT
Josh, I really like your thoughts. I think they are very enlightening. I started a conversation on a smaller set of possibilities than the ones you talk about. Please check them out at http://mytechneeds.wordpress.com
Reply to this comment
by uabassguy July 10, 2009 10:40 PM PDT
Personally, I have nothing to hide, so I could care less about privacy. In any event, it's linux, things can be blocked from a root level if one was so inclined. My opinion may be biased, though. Because when it comes to the bigger monster, M$ has and will always take the cake, and eat it too. If Google can bring open source to a larger community, I welcome it.
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 July 11, 2009 1:48 PM PDT
No offense intended, but the relinquishing of privacy based on the "nothing to hide" argument is counter to everything that the USA stands for. Read the founding fathers--and not just the toned down, sanitized version about them. And let's not forget this lesson from world history: Whether or not you have nothing to hide or whether or not you are defined as a criminal all depends on who is making the rules and setting the definitions.
by zyxxy July 24, 2009 7:59 AM PDT
You have nothing to hide today, but some of what you are doing today may indicate criminal intent twenty years from now. Rules and rulers change. As blusky08 says, read John Adams, read Thomas Jefferson. Each would have been charged with treason if the colonies had lost the revolution. Each would have hung. Their views were radical in 1775 and their views are still radical today. Thomas Jefferson felt that revolution was required on a periodic basis in order to refresh The Republic.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (38 Comments)
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right