• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
July 1, 2009 2:17 PM PDT

Yahoo's Delicious proves Chrome extensions real

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments

Yahoo has released a test version of a Delicious social bookmarking extension for Chrome, one of the strongest indications so far that the technology foundation is coming to fruition in Google's browser.

Extensions still must be specifically enabled through a command-line switch on the developer version of Chrome, and Google recently broke extensions compatibility through an update, so the technology clearly is immature. But Google is steadily addressing the concern that its browser lacks one of Firefox's notable features--called add-ons in the Mozilla browser.

"Delicious extension (alpha version) for Google Chrome is now available," said Amit Papnai of the Delicious team in a mailing list posting Tuesday. "This is a light version of the extension and allows you to sign in and post bookmarks to your Delicious account."

The Delicious extension for Chrome shows the logo in the address bar. Clicking it pops up a dialog box as a new miniature Web page.

The Delicious extension for Chrome shows the logo in the address bar. Clicking it pops up a dialog box as a new miniature Web page.

(Credit: Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)

Extensions can be powerful tools to customize a browser's interface or add significant features. In an effort to ease programming difficulties, Chrome's extensions technology uses the same interface techniques as Web pages, a method Mozilla as adopted for its Jetpack Firefox extensions project at Mozilla Labs.

Delicious lets people store, tag, describe, and share bookmarks, and the add-on simplifies use of the service directly through the browser.

In addition, Nick Baum released a Chrome-based Twitter extension called Chritter on Tuesday.

I found both the Delicious and Chritter extensions easy to download and install, though Chritter isn't terribly useful at this stage because it only flashes recent tweets in a status bar. Update 2:57 p.m. PDT: Google has added a rough but workable interface for managing Chrome extensions, including uninstalling them, by typing "chrome://extensions/" into the address bar.

Extensions compatibility can be tough to maintain, as the release of Firefox 3.5 Tuesday illustrated.

"We're working on pushing out a new Gears version that supports Firefox 3.5," Google programmer Aaron Boodman said Monday on a mailing list for Gears, a Firefox add-on that among other things can enable offline access to the Gmail Web application. "We typically wait until the official 'gold' release of Firefox is pushed, because otherwise, we keep having to do new builds every time a new release candidate is pushed."

One of Firefox's most popular add-ons is AdBlock Plus, which suppresses online advertisements. With Google's business dependent on advertising, skeptics have said they don't expect Chrome ever to support that technology.

However, in a December design document about Chrome extensions, Boodman highlighted AdBlock Plus as an example of an extensions use that Google would like to support. And discussion of ad blocking in Chrome has surfaced on the Chrome extensions mailing list.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by flickrz July 1, 2009 3:35 PM PDT
Wonder why google haven't build in bookmark sharing in chrome that syncs anywhere if you are logged in?
Reply to this comment
by Shankland July 1, 2009 6:30 PM PDT
Given that there are third-party extensions that already do this (I like and use Xmarks on Firefox, for example), Google likely is focusing its Chrome resources where they're more urgently needed. Bookmark management springs to mind--it doesn't even exist in the Mac version of Chrome yet, and there's little point to bookmark sync without bookmark management first.
by seven7dust July 1, 2009 7:22 PM PDT
that would be killer
by BlitzBoy1120 July 1, 2009 3:54 PM PDT
well if they were to design an ad-blocker for chrome, they could make it to specifically show only google ads
Reply to this comment
by Shankland July 1, 2009 6:19 PM PDT
But if somebody else were to design it, they could design it otherwise. There's nothing stopping others from developing extensions.
by Drummer16161616 July 1, 2009 4:54 PM PDT
No ad block....no care
Reply to this comment
by hankthedwarf July 1, 2009 5:50 PM PDT
I think most people object to image and flash-based ads. Google's lifeblood is text ads. They probably will allow adblock, but not the sister extension Element Hiding Helper, which can be used to block entire sections of pages.
Reply to this comment
by cp256 July 2, 2009 7:42 AM PDT
Stupid advertisers and advert enablers think that preventing ad blocking will in some way lead to ad haters paying attention to ads and blowing money up their wazoos? Blocking ad blockers just pisses people off while allowing them cause virtually no decline in the advertiser's sales revenue and may in fact increase the click per view ratio. Displaying an ad to someone who really doesn't want to see it is of negative true value. I use ADP on FF 3.5 and I love it. I have gone to great lengths in the past to block web spam, including building a unix proxy box to replace web page ads with my own random anti-spam messages. Do the persistent ad spammers really think jamming an ad in my face will lead to my purchasing something? Not bloody likely. Make it easy for me to block your ads and you gain a little good will.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland July 2, 2009 9:45 PM PDT
You say, "Make it easy for me to block your ads and you gain a little good will." If the ad is blocked, how do you know to whom you should direct your goodwill? I'm not sure many advertisers will find your offer terribly enticing. :)

I'm not sure overall how anxious advertisers are about ad-blocking technology. Though I can't imagine advertisers like it much, I think the vast majority of people don't go to the trouble to figure out how.
by manwalklikebear July 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
I hope they don't go crazy with extensions. I like Chrome for it's simplicity and i'd hate to see it get bogged down the way Firefox has.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right