• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
June 29, 2009 4:00 AM PDT

Ch-ch-ch-changes: A visual history of Firefox

by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 40 comments
Share

The official release of Mozilla Firefox 3.5 is due this week. It's a significant milestone in the open-source browser's history. Putting pure features aside, let's take a look at some of the big design changes Mozilla has made over the years, beginning with version 0.8 when Mozilla renamed it from Firebird to Firefox.

For the sake of simplicity we're keeping it limited to just the Windows and Mac versions. And for certain features where there is little, if any, difference between the platforms--we're sticking to the Windows version.

The four things we're comparing are navigation, tabs, bookmarks, and the settings menu:


Navigation

Navigation has experienced subtle changes over the years, with the exception of version 3. This brought the increased size of the back button, and noticeable shrinking of the rest of the controls. Mozilla also made it easier to bookmark pages, by adding a star button right into the address bar, which users can click, avoiding having to use keyboard shortcuts or on-screen menus to save a page.

Note: To see the full-size versions of these images just click on them.

(Credit: CNET)

Tabs

Tabs are a very important part of Firefox. Version 3.5 adds a new plus button that users can click on to create a new tab. Previously this required a keyboard shortcut or selecting the option from a menu.

Version 3.5 is also getting "tab tearing," which lets users pull away tabs from one window to add to another, or break off into an entirely new window. Early versions of the browser wouldn't even let you re-order them without a third-party extension, and up until Firefox 2, the controls to close individual tabs were kept on the far right side. Version 2 also introduced a new way to view a list of all your tabs by clicking the arrow on the right side of the browser. This let you pick any one of your tabs without having to hunt for ones that could be off the screen.

(Credit: CNET)

Bookmarks

Bookmark management saw its biggest change in Firefox 3. This version had a completely overhauled tool, which included things like tags and navigation controls that let you surf around your bookmarks as if you were visiting Web pages.

Firefox 3 also did a better job of letting users import and export their bookmarks right from the manager. It included simple controls for reverting back to previous versions of bookmark history, and merging multiple libraries of bookmarks into one master file.


(Credit: CNET)

Settings menus

The options menu is the least sexy thing on this list, but one that most easily shows the changes in the way people are using Web browsers. Besides a total reduction in size, logo changes, and a swap in navigation from the side to the top, later versions simply moved things around. They also gave users more control over what the browser displayed when it started up, and where downloads went when finished.

(Credit: CNET)

The next Firefox

Visual alterations are easy to track, but some of the biggest changes to Firefox have been under the hood. As browsers begin to borrow features from one another, the underlying differentiation becomes what they're built on. Rendering engines and resource management are becoming big selling points as users begin to care less about what their browser looks like (see Google Chrome's and Apple Safari 4's understated looks), and more about how fast pages load and recover from crashes.

So what will the next version of Firefox bring? We're still a long way off from version 4.0, but Mozilla has been quite open about where the browser is going. The company has already published its road map of intended features for version 3.6, which is due sometime next year.

One of the most exciting features that's planned for 3.6 is what Mozilla is calling "task bar navigation." It's described as a way for a user to "organize tabs, history, downloaded files, and other resources according to the task they were attempting to accomplish," which means you're going to spend less time tracking around menus or third-party sites, and more time simply typing a few letters into Firefox's address bar to do tasks. Other features include a way to search through open tabs, and more easily open up sets of tabs you had open in an earlier session.

Until then, the easiest way to stay on the cutting edge of Firefox (and other browsers) is to use the beta versions, which are released to brave users weeks and sometimes months before the general public. These may come with a few bugs, but the risk is often outweighed by the reward.

Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (40 Comments)
by dascha1 June 29, 2009 4:32 AM PDT
I'm 99.999% correct that the "Ch-Ch-" part of your title comes from the song performed (and written) by UK-based music artist David Bowie. He is married to super-model Iman though status unknown if he is still performing.

I'm sorry Josh, but thought it fair to clarify for your viewers and listeners who may be too young to know this.
Reply to this comment
by Special(e) June 29, 2009 5:25 AM PDT
David Bowie huh? Thanks for clearing that up...i had never heard of him.
by dascha1 June 29, 2009 6:37 AM PDT
You're welcome, thanks for listening.
by tech_crazy June 29, 2009 8:30 AM PDT
What song are you referring to - China Girl?
by lil_ryry7 June 29, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
Is it the song changes or something like that. Im 15 and I listen to all the music like that. My favorite though are the Beatles
by traxx09 June 30, 2009 7:11 AM PDT
Seriously? We're having this conversation?
by ColinABQ June 29, 2009 4:39 AM PDT
I caught myself singing the song and counting the ch-'s in the article title, as though the number of ch-'s would either qualify or discredit the content. Sad.

I think I preferred the pre-1.x navigation toolbar buttons. Smaller was better.
Reply to this comment
by Gonzie June 29, 2009 4:40 AM PDT
Re: Firefox navigation

oh so the Mac nav bar has always been a waste of space. They should simply use GrApple themes from the start rather than waste their time
Reply to this comment
by Hunnter2k3 June 29, 2009 4:41 AM PDT
I hate the navigation toolbars in 3+, too stupid looking and has more emphasis on "cooool" instead of using as little space as possible.
Get flashy graphics to hell, keep it within themes PLEASE.

But who am i kidding? Mozilla have ruined Firefox now. So much for the "modular browser".
Reply to this comment
by ElArZ June 29, 2009 5:14 AM PDT
WOW! So you couldn't just right-click on the toolbar, choose Customize and then check "Use small icons"?

No, i guess not. Whining is a lot easier.
by Endbringer June 29, 2009 6:18 AM PDT
Who made Firefox so great in the first place before Mozilla "ruined" it?

lol
by Daguin25 June 29, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
Yea, there's really not that much on the nav bar there buddy.... nothing wrong with updating the look either. Whining will get you nowhere
by LoudHeart June 29, 2009 4:43 AM PDT
I have been using FireFox 3.5 RC since last Monday to test out the new video element in the HTML5. It's beautiful. If Javascript in enabled, the video element comes with default control buttons (ie. play, pause, etc). Fun to program.
Reply to this comment
by frederico88 June 29, 2009 5:52 AM PDT
How come no one compares the daily use of RSS feeds between the browsers? It is a most useful tool and yet no comments but speed, buttons, add ons and so on. I would appreciate a comparaison analysis between Fox 3.5, IE8 and Opera 10 presentations and deliveries of RSS feeds.
Reply to this comment
by MojavePython June 29, 2009 5:55 AM PDT
All Firefox has done over the years is emulate Opera's features. The "new" plus button for the tabs is a perfect example. If it wasn't for the vast collection of extensions and add-ons, Firefox would be just as useful as the Big Blue E.
Reply to this comment
by USAF_22 June 29, 2009 5:55 AM PDT
I want 1.0 navigation, 3.0 tabs, 3.5 bookmarks, and 3.0 settings. How can I make that happen?
Reply to this comment
by LoudHeart June 29, 2009 6:02 AM PDT
You need to pay $10.50 USD (1.0+3.0+3.5+3.0) for that kind of customization. :)
by Freedomstarfox June 29, 2009 6:15 AM PDT
You can try to design your own extensions and themes to fit your needs :)
by Johncuepublic June 29, 2009 5:58 AM PDT
I certainly hope you have prior consent from the artist for copying those unmistakable lyrics. <grin>
Reply to this comment
by srixion June 29, 2009 7:40 AM PDT
Firefox 3.5 is a good back up browser, but if you want better performance switch to Google Chrome. I have tried all the new browsers with Windows 7 and Vista and Firefox still hangs all the time. You would be better off with IE 8 instead of firefox.
Reply to this comment
by FF2009 June 30, 2009 5:08 AM PDT
Sorry to burst yer bubble but Chrome is plain dull as of this moment...lacks many features of Firefox not to mention the add-ons. Maybe in a few years Chrome might catch up with the major player Browsers...and that's a fact!
by sanjayb June 30, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
Better off with IE8 instead of Firefox. Ok. Whatever.
by monster_eater123 June 30, 2009 7:28 PM PDT
Look here I'm stuck with a 512 kps connection and IE8 is SLOW! Firefox 3 is about the best web browser that I have found all around. I'll admit that Firefox is a power user in terms of resources, but it does take a lot of power to run all those fancy add-ons and things. Don't even get me started on Opera. Opera runs slower on my connection than IE8! And that's sad! The only good thing I can say about Chrome is at least it's faster than IE. Now, I'll admit that I did like what Safari 4 had to offer, but it still has a long way to go. The Interface for Safari 4 is clean-cut and I like that. But, the web browser was slow loading heavy web pages. The good side of Safari 4 is that it did load flash games and videos almost instantaneously, even on my connection speed. Over all I find that Firefox is the best web browser out there it's customizable, stable, and fairly quick.
by griffinme June 29, 2009 7:48 AM PDT
"All Firefox has done over the years is emulate Opera's features. The "new" plus button for the tabs is a perfect example. If it wasn't for the vast collection of extensions and add-ons, Firefox would be just as useful as the Big Blue E."

"It is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make their appearance in the world."
Aristotle

Since when is it a bad thing to take a look around and go "Hey, they got that right and over here, that over here looks good too. We should be doing that."? Some might even consider that research. Besides, the computer world is filled with people building off other peoples ideas. Even the guys at Xerox borrowed ideas they had seen else where and expanded off them. Also, extensions, add-ons and themes are some of the main reasons to use FF. It makes the browser amazingly customizable. My FF is nothing like my wife's, yours or the person's down the street and I like it that way. When other browsers build up a similar collection I will think about using them.
Reply to this comment
by interinc June 29, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
Interesting ideas you put out there. I guess its most interesting that you quote Aristotle then forget the evolution of technology itself.

The wheel was first made from stone. Someone borrowed that idea and crafted one out of wood. Someone else borrowed that idea and made it lighter by using timber spokes.......eventually we ended up with tires.

That's just how technology evolves no matter if its the wheel or if its a piece of software. Isn't that what technology is? The evolution of ideas built upon previous ideas, built upon previous idea. I think I made my point. ;)
by sans8812 June 29, 2009 11:38 AM PDT
@internic:

Just nitpicking, but the first wheel was made out of wood, not stone. The image of cave men carving a wheel out of stone comes from pop culture. The idea for the wheel most likely came from using felled logs as rollers to move heavy pieces of stone.
by BtmnHatesRbn June 29, 2009 8:29 AM PDT
Why just use "Firefox"? It's the continuation of Netscape. So why not show everything changing from MOSIAC until now?

This is like people who talk about video game history. They forget there are other systems besides the PlayStation line out there.
Reply to this comment
by exactlyy June 29, 2009 9:39 AM PDT
ie is slow, stupid and unsecure , chrome is naked.. give it sometimes when it gets a lil more features and its performance w'll drop badly , they even needed a year to add FeedBack and its taking them forever to add a master password so noone can see ur saved passwords . its just incomplete browser that can only be used by kids who wanna play yahoo games.
Reply to this comment
by hawkeyeaz1 June 29, 2009 2:12 PM PDT
In reference to Google Chrome, they aren't really trying to make a browser by what IE or Firefox or Safari or Opera look(ed) like, they are just getting the technology out there to get it working and tested.

Why?
Because Chrome isn't a 'browser' as much as it is a platform for running NaCL programs as if they were Windows/OSX/Linux/etc pograms installed on the computer. It's VMWare but a lot faster, smaller and more efficient.
by joelFiser June 29, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
Firefox crashes daily for me.

I didn't read where they added the ability to crash every day at least twice. That's what's been happening to me for the past couple of months.

I'm slowly switching to Opera. I just need Google Bookmarks and Bye Bye Firefox.
Reply to this comment
by hawkeyeaz1 June 29, 2009 2:13 PM PDT
It sounds like one of your plugins has an issue, as I have been using most versions out there for years (on differing platforms) w/o (many) crashes for years. I can run it work weeks at time before a crash occurs, and I keep dozens of tabs open at any given time.
by slumbergod June 29, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
i was hoping to see some pics of FF's evolution on Linux.
Reply to this comment
by abcd9009 June 29, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
As Josh points out some of the new features to look for in 3.6 "Other features include a way to search through open tabs..."

I am curious to know if there is any browser out there (Chrome, FF, IE, Safari, Opera, ...) which would allow me to search for a text through all open tabs? If not built-in, is there any extension or Add-on which would accomplish this? Thanks

Surprised even Chrome doesn't have this functionality yet!
Reply to this comment
by setjeff15081947 June 29, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
Josh Lowensohn, I suggest you go back and play with your Finger-Painting set, because you don't know squat about this Impossible-To-Navigate browser constructed by the "Keystone Kops" at Mozilla. I despise that name ---Mozilla. Internet Explorer, Version 0.0, with its thousands of flaws over the years, is less frustrating than Mozilla's Firefox. If Firefox was paper, I'd use it to wipe my ... .
[Chuckle ... Neither a Mozilla fan here, nor an I.E. advocate; my vote, if you can spring for the price, is Apple's Safari. It's elegant.]
...
Reply to this comment
by SX10 IS July 12, 2009 11:14 AM PDT
Eww... (lol)
by TV James June 29, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
All these changes and the settings for what (tabs) to open when the browser starts and/or the user clicks "Home" is still a really poor UI.
Reply to this comment
by 123yik June 29, 2009 4:24 PM PDT
Firefox is an awsome browser, its plug-ins and all make it so customizable. But i always get inclined to use Google Chrome. It is something about its easy to use interface and speed which makes it feel like home. Although i have a ton of plugins and themes installed on firefox, they arent something i cant live without. I fact i barely find a use for them all. In Chrome i especially like the new tab page which shows my bookmarks, recent visited. Bcz of my frequent shorts visits on the computer, in the end i prefer speed over features, basically all i want to do is check my mail, gizmodo, cnet, and facebook.
Reply to this comment
by sural98 June 30, 2009 1:05 AM PDT
Opera has a small handy button at the bottom to hide/show images.
FF can borrow this feature from Opera.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (40 Comments)
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right