• On TV.com: Julie is HOT (and so is TV in a FLASH)
June 14, 2009 2:58 AM PDT

'#CNNFail': Twitterverse slams network's Iran absence

by Daniel Terdiman

While word of riots in the streets of Tehran spread like wildfire on Twitter, CNN stayed largely silent on the story, surprising and dismaying many.

(Credit: Twitter)

As the Iranian election aftermath unfolded in Tehran--thousands of demonstrators took to the streets to express their anger at perceived electoral irregularities--an unexpected hashtag began to explode through the Twitterverse: "CNNFail."

Even as Twitter became the best source for rapid-fire news developments from the front lines of the riots in Tehran, a growing number of users of the microblogging service were incredulous at the near total lack of coverage of the story on CNN, a network that cut its teeth with on-the-spot reporting from the Middle East.

For most of Saturday, CNN.com had no stories about the massive protests on behalf of Mir Hossein Mousavi, who was reported by the Iranian government to have lost to the sitting president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The widespread street clashes--nearly unheard of in the tightly controlled Iran--reflected popular belief that the election had been rigged, a sentiment that was even echoed, to some extent, by the U.S. government Saturday.

"The Obama administration is determined to press on with efforts to engage the Iranian government," The New York Times cited senior officials as having said Saturday, "despite misgivings about irregularities in the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad."

Yet even as word of the urban strife, seemingly led by those posting to Twitter, spread next around the world on news networks like the BBC, NPR, and the Times, CNN remained mostly mute. Even when the network's Internet site finally posted a story late Saturday, the network's first "story highlight" was, "Ahmadinejad plans rally after winning second presidential term."

Increasingly, Twitter has become the go-to source for breaking news about any kind of notable event, be it an earthquake, terrorist attacks in Mumbai, or post-election riots in Tehran. Yet many Twitter users found CNN's lack of attention to what could end up being one of the biggest stories in years appalling.

"CNN just loops the same stories endlessly, while ignoring the biggest story," posted Twitter user MediaButcher.

"CNN needs to talk about the important things like Ms. California and who Paris Hilton is (sleeping with)," wrote Twitter user ArchivalQuality.

Others used the opportunity to applaud the work of other networks while indirectly criticizing CNN. "Might I point out to all of those tracking #CNNFail that there's a corresponding #NPRWin good coverage @ www.npr.org," opined Twitter user Nickbernstein, referring to the Twitter convention of using "hashtags," or pound-signs before keywords to indicate Twitter search terms, in this case a reference to the suggestion that NPR had done a good job covering the Iranian riots.

And it wasn't long before word of CNN's theoretical reporting failure began to make its way into more established media. Under the headline, "Dear CNN, Please Check Twitter for News About Iran," the popular blog ReadWriteWeb blasted the network for its failure to cover the clearly massive story in the Middle East.

"Hours after Iranian police began clashing with tens of thousands of people in the street," ReadWriteWeb wrote late Saturday night, "the top story on CNN.com remains peoples' confusion about the switch from analog TV signals."

It's odd that CNN would be so late to this story, especially given the criticism it's getting from the Twitterverse, and given how clued in the network is supposed to be to Twitter. It was, after all, only two months ago that CNN's Twitter account barely missed out--to actor Ashton Kutcher--on being the first to accumulate a million followers.

One would think, then, that when the idea began to percolate around Twitter that CNN was missing out on a major, historical story like the one developing in Iran, the network would have noted the discontent and done something about it.

But even as the sun prepared to rise in the eastern United States, CNN's Web site was still focusing on Ahmadinejad's victory and not the fact that massive riots in the streets of Tehran might be a world-changing moment, potentially on par with the failed 1991 coup in the Soviet Union that led to the collapse of the authoritarian government there.

To be sure, it's too early to tell if the events unfolding in Terhan will have such a lasting effect. But in Iran, there haven't been such vivid pictures of popular anger at the government since the revolution there in 1979 that toppled the Shah and led to the current religious fundamentalist leadership.

And to the thousands on Twitter posting to the #CNNFail thread, this story should be a no-brainer for the network that managed to have the only reporters on the ground when the United States began bombing Baghdad in 1991 at the beginning of the Gulf War.

Daniel Terdiman is a staff writer at CNET News covering games, Net culture, and everything in between. E-mail Daniel.
Recent posts from Webware
Hundreds of Facebook groups hijacked
Plan your wedding with these Web resources
Twitter, LinkedIn team up for self-promotion free-for-all
'Elf Yourself' returns with Facebook and Twitter power
Sneak peek: Xobni e-mail app for BlackBerry
More time needed for revised Google Books deal
With AdMob, Google seeks mobile-ad advantage
Closing chapter of Google Books saga near
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (54 Comments)
by rmva June 14, 2009 3:22 AM PDT
Hey! It's the weekend. US news media only work 4 1/2 day weeks. They're saving money.
Reply to this comment
by franfin June 18, 2009 3:07 PM PDT
I can't believe stuff like this happens I always thought CNN was a very serious news broadcaster and wouldn't leave news out you can read another great article about this at http://www.aircheese.com/article/cnnfails-to-report-news
by alflanagan June 14, 2009 3:28 AM PDT
I went to cnn.com to check their current coverage, and it was probably the first time in months. Not A Good Sign.
Reply to this comment
by bobmarleypeople June 14, 2009 3:33 AM PDT
I've watch CNN International as my primary TV news source...I didn't know any of these news stories. Oh well, back to BBC News then!
Reply to this comment
by Phil_Canyon June 14, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
Hey stupid, did you read the article? They also said bbc and npr didn't report on this.
by creanium June 14, 2009 10:12 AM PDT
Hey Phil_Canyon-

Be careful who you call stupid since you're completely wrong. Read the article again, especially this part:

"Yet even as word of the urban strife, seemingly led by those posting to Twitter, spread next around the world on news networks like the BBC, NPR, and the Times, CNN remained mostly mute."

Fail
by t8 June 14, 2009 6:14 PM PDT
Whenever someone calls someone stupid they inevitably end up being the stupid one.
God is having some fun at the expense of the arrogant.
by mbenedict June 14, 2009 4:06 AM PDT
Ahmadinejad's highly dubious "win" is very bad news for Obama, who wants to engage Iran regarding nuclear weapons. Suddenly the Iranian government is without credibility. How can Obama now have a "dialog" with Ahmadinejad, giving this dictator legitimacy?

As for CNN, anything that's bad for Obama must not be reported, for as long as possible. It's bad for CNN business and doesn't align with Mr. Turner's political philosophy. When the protests were at full swing in Iran, CNN was busy peddling a story about how health care was destroying small businesses and how Obama's plan would save the day.

But the biggest story that's missing from the Twitterverse is the fact that Iranian elections, at the end of the day, mean nothing. Iran has no democracy. The "Supreme Leader" (Ali Khamenei) pre-approves every candidate for every significant office in Iran, including the presidency and every single member of the parliament.

It's a stacked deck. Whether the winner is Ahmadinejad or Moussavi, both men were approved-by and subservient-to Ali Khamenei and his "Guardian Council". Khamenei controls the military, the Iranian media, all communication facilities, and has the final say over any matters of the parliament (including absolute veto power over any legislative bill.)

In Iran, democracy is an illusion. Choice is an illusion.
Reply to this comment
by RogParish June 14, 2009 11:42 AM PDT
Mr. (Ted) Turner hasn't had any affiliation with CNN for several years, as he sold out to Time-Warner. Thus began the decent of CNN. I don't bother to watch it anymore. If you want good coverage of Middle Eastern topics, watch Al-Jezeera in English. http://english.aljazeera.net/
by cosuna June 15, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
@mbenedict: As much as the U.S. hates Ahmadinejad and as much as Bush wanted to engulf Iran using his "Middle East" preemptive attacks, and created huge amount of FUD on Iran, there is still no way of knowing if Ahmadinejad's "nuclear weapons" are as strong and potent as Saddam Hussein's "Weapons of Mass Destruction". (Of course, I'm being sarcastic).

That aside, if Ahmadinejad rigged the elections should have nothing to do with his "evil nuclear plans". He is just another wanna be dictator like Chavez, Kim Jong-il and, yes, George W. Bush (remember the ballot problem in his brother's controlled state Florida).
by wutnot June 14, 2009 4:39 AM PDT
Meanwhile, BECAUSE MANY OF US DON'T TURN TO FOX FOR REAL NEWS, or expect much from Fox, barely anyone is commenting on the #FOXFAIL. When CNNFail was trending and no-one was turning against Fox, I turned on the tv and checked them out, assuming they must have been doing something right. They too were covering Miss USA , and had an extended interview with her lasting I don't know how many minutes.
Reply to this comment
by mbenedict June 14, 2009 4:51 AM PDT
The reason for no #FOXFAIL is because Fox is simply carrying the AP newsfeed on Iran. So yesterday for example Fox ran an article about Mousavi's claim of election fraud (since it was on the AP feed), while CNN was pretty much silent on the issue.
by Jack K1 June 14, 2009 6:25 AM PDT
CNN cut a deal with Saddam Hussein so that it could continue its bland reporting from Iraq.
No doubt CNN has cut the same deal in Iran.
Reply to this comment
by jarobusa June 14, 2009 6:45 AM PDT
Even the Wall Street Journal has been covering the chaos in Iran. No wonder CNN's ratings are falling.
Reply to this comment
by Kacela June 14, 2009 6:51 AM PDT
Probably one of the reasons that CNN was lax on their coverage was that they failed to get their copy of the script on time. Methinks the distortions of "widespread riots" are vastly over-rated; all the other "news" coverage have all shown the same "rioters" and "police" from the same intersection but from different angles. It's called a psyop folks. I wouldn't doubt we (Americans) are amassed at the border paying people to pose as rioters.
Reply to this comment
by dfevans-1 June 14, 2009 4:18 PM PDT
are you sure it is Psyops? Or are you really doing psyops with your comments?

OOOhhhhh....just leave it for Crescent News Network to tell us what to think. more psyops.

This sword (psyops) cuts both ways.
by czhang7363 June 14, 2009 6:55 AM PDT
That's weird...CNN International has been covering the story crazily here (in China). They even interrupt programs every 15 mins with "breaking news" to repeat the exact same information about the protests!
Reply to this comment
by jarobusa June 14, 2009 7:01 AM PDT
Right now Fox News has new video from Tehran. They have been covering this since it began.
Reply to this comment
by rmva June 14, 2009 7:24 AM PDT
Any country that has an official called "The Supreme Leader" doesn't have free elections. The election was a hoax. The Supreme Leader mailed in the results months ago. The people of Iran must now come to grips with that reality and decide for themselves what they are going to do. This will take time. The last thing they need is 'outside interference,' the stalking horse of all tyrants.
Reply to this comment
by cpopken June 14, 2009 7:31 AM PDT
That is what happens when news outlets become too politically involved. They start to censor their stories to not upset one side or the other. All sides need to start reporting NEWS and not trying to slant anything to one side or the other.
Reply to this comment
by pw1y June 14, 2009 8:29 AM PDT
Just erase CNN from you channel list and get rid of the bookmark in your browser. End of (inadequate and biased) story.
Reply to this comment
by Phil_Canyon June 14, 2009 9:40 AM PDT
Amen
by lurkedq June 14, 2009 8:40 AM PDT
Most any organization run as a religion is going to self-serve. Look at the Mormons, Scientology or the Catholic Church: Moribund, insular, massively self-protective and non-transparent. Iran is like a giant church to the owners (i.e. their Council of Supreme Commanders) - so of course they're going to rig the election in any way they choose. On the CNN coverage question? It's just humorous. You can get better news from the Daily show or Chelsea Lately (and they only run 4 x 22 minutes per week each).
Reply to this comment
by rmva June 14, 2009 8:46 AM PDT
We're getting into that sticky situation called Two Reliable Sources. It's the difference between news gathering and blogging. News organizations have to find a second, independent source before they can file their reports. Not as lightning quick, but more authoritative.
Reply to this comment
by SeizeCTRL June 14, 2009 8:54 AM PDT
But when you look at the Hudson River plane crash, all the information was coming in from twitter. The first image of the plane came from twitter... it took all the new agencies 10+ minutes to arrive on scene, but people who lived close by were tweeting the details in near real time. Don't underestimate the value of blogging en masse.

People on the scene blogging / tweeting about what they see can be just as valid as any official news source in this day and age. Heck, in some cases, even more valid because it's not haunted by network bias.
by SlimGem June 14, 2009 8:56 AM PDT
CNN started going downhill after Ted Turner sold out to Time Warner, an incompetent group of clods if there ever was one. I used to start the day with Headline News and then to CNN for more info, but those days are over. HLN is probably the worst, as it has evolved into a sleazy broadcast tabloid with the likes of Nancy Grace and Glenn Beck. I just wish cable was à la carte so I didn't have to help finance all of this crap.
Reply to this comment
by wayneepalmer June 15, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
Glenn Beck went over to the Fox News pundit pit months ago.

HLN is now "Serial predator / Psycho Spouse Central" pretty much 24/7.

They don't do any real news much after 12pm (gotta wait for Oprah and the rest of the clones to finish).
by dbargen June 14, 2009 9:19 AM PDT
CNN not covering news- is anyone surprised? After lord Obama's proclamation that his CAiro speech should foster "progressive" change in the Iranian election, of course CNN isn't going to cover a fail like that. They've got waaaay to much invested in the man to work to his detriment.

Duh.

Funny how so many just aren't buying the hype anymore. Whatever is the second-smallest big cable media outlet to do?
Reply to this comment
by SlimGem June 14, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
@ dbargen,

Thank goodness you have Fox News to give you the facts and truth.
by tclovescricket June 14, 2009 9:52 AM PDT
I love how you anti-Obama try and spin every story as showing his all-around evilness and proving there is a conspiracy to make him look good. If anyone benefits from corporate mainstream media NOT covering the fact that not all Iranians are America-hating nutcases who would do anything to destroy us all, it is the neocons. They are the ones who require a "boogeyman" Enemy of America to try and promote their failed worldview that everyone in the world hates America and we must kill anyone who disagrees with us before they destroy us. By covering the story of election protests in Iran, corporate media would actually be helping President Obama's cause by showing there are people wanting to engage with us. So go and try spinning your falsehoods someplace else, where we don't know what you're really up to.
Reply to this comment
by Kwasiowusu June 14, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
@ tclovescricket :"I love how you anti-Obama try and spin every story as showing his all-around evilness"

Obama IS evil. No question about that. His entire adust lufe was spent being mentored by America's biggest demestic terrorist ever, William Ayers, a guy who on the very morning of 9/11, did an interview in the New York times, saying his only regret was that he didn't bomb even more places, and kill even more Americans.

@ tclovescricket:" and proving there is a conspiracy to make him look good"

There IS a conspiray by the retarded mainstream meia to make the Obama empty suite, terrorist love,r look good. You got to be pretty naive if you can't even see that.
by Patcheeetroof June 15, 2009 2:11 PM PDT
Kwasiowusu is spot on. The left-wing mainstream media won't ever report this, but there's solid proof that terrorist Ayers visited Hawaii and Hussein Obama back when he was in high school: http://tinyurl.com/2w4apm

Not only did Ayers give an interview on Sept. 10, the day before the attacks, but he also was known to have met secretly several times with the hijackers like Mohammed Muretta. U libtards are gonna be sorry.
by fejerdk June 14, 2009 10:06 AM PDT
Why is CNN being criticized for not monitoring voting irregularities in Iran?

They did not care to monitor voting irregularities in the USA?
Reply to this comment
by jtothef June 14, 2009 12:05 PM PDT
"It's odd that CNN would be so late to this story, especially given the criticism it's getting from the Twitterverse, and given how clued in the network is supposed to be to Twitter..."

actually, it's odd that cnn would be so late to this story because they had built their brand expectation of "being there" over the years with a history of images of anchors reporting from balcony's atop well branded hotels near predetermined bombing areas for both gulf wars, so that now a generation expects them be everywhere that news happens. that at least shows that they understand the requirement of being there." not sure what happened to that strategy.

nevertheless, it turns out they're not really a news outlet - just a pr one (like most)

no worries - it's the new socialism/collectivsm - get over news brands - "the people" report the news now
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (54 Comments)
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right