• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
June 4, 2009 12:54 PM PDT

Microsoft gives Bing stronger search filter option

by Tom Krazit

Bing's smart motion preview lets you hover over video search results and play a clip, but not if your network administrator plans to use Microsoft's new tweak.

(Credit: Screenshot by Tom Krazit/CNET)

Microsoft has tweaked the search filters on its new Bing search engine following criticism that its smart motion video feature allowed Web surfers to watch porn without visiting adult Web sites.

The company announced the change in a blog post Thursday, as it also defended its approach to adult content in search results as a "more conservative approach than others in the industry." Bing does not show any video results for queries such as "porn" until the searcher disables a safe search filter, but following that click searchers can watch a small clip of adult content in the browser while still on the Bing site.

Bing's video preview feature--known as smart motion preview--is one of the selling points Microsoft has used to try to get momentum behind its revamped search engine. But the company acknowledged that corporate customers had expressed a desire to enforce stronger search filters within their networks, and so it is giving those network administrators as well as individual users on a home network the ability to add a string of text to Bing queries that automatically enforces the strictest search settings regardless of the user's individual setting.

This is "a short-term workaround" that will be finalized later, according to Microsoft, but no further details were provided. A Microsoft representative was looking into the details of how home users could implement this on their own networks.

Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom.
Recent posts from Webware
Popular iPhone movie app flops on BlackBerry
Opera Mobile 10 beta browser: First Look video
Google trying not to cross 'the creepy line'
Integrated retweet on its way to Twitter
Mozilla's e-mail group looks toward the cloud
Facebook: We're going after scammy ads, too
Alterna-browsers Firefox, Chrome get quick fixes
Offerpal Media mess gets stickier
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by monkeyfun14 June 4, 2009 1:04 PM PDT
"Bing's smart motion preview lets you hover over video search results and play a clip, but not if your network adminstrator plans to use Microsoft's new tweak."

I believe the word you were looking for is "administrator"

Isn't there some sort of spell checker that points these things out before you post?
Reply to this comment
by spiffy1001 June 4, 2009 1:27 PM PDT
Some people may think you are really smart for pointing out a spelling mistake in a blog.

I think it makes you a jerk.
by michael_j_x June 4, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
Nevertheless, you expect someone writing an article for a news site, to at least run a spell-checker before publishing.
by lennie22 June 4, 2009 2:37 PM PDT
@spiffy1001:

it really doesn't make him a jerk actually, who turns out to be a jerk is actually you. this is not a site where someone is posting a blog out of his/her parents basement, this is a prominent news site. Cnet news....freakin news.com. mistakes like these should not be tolerated...in the same regard, I doubt you would overlook a spelling mistake in a magazine or news paper, it gives the effect to the reader like the writer doesn't care of his work or readers.

it makes me wonder what the hell some bloggers are using to post their blogs, I mean would it be so hard to use MSFT word which spellcheck by default? or even windows live writer which is easy to link it to your blog so you can publish your blog posting right from the writer itself and it does come with spellcheck/grammer-check by default and its free. I mean, what the hell was he using to post his blog?.....seriously, you need to take pride in your work. it would be nice if you actually thank the guy who saw the mistake, there's nothing wrong with a little humility.
by BogusBasin June 4, 2009 2:59 PM PDT
Let's say Microsoft's new search takes off and becomes the Google of tomorrow. How long until they start tailoring the results to favor their own products or those of the companies that are willing to pay them a fee? This is the Microsoft I have learned to despise. I will never use any of their products ever.

Amen
by t8 June 4, 2009 3:01 PM PDT
Do you feel better now that you picked up a mistake that you would never make?
by slecalvez June 4, 2009 3:24 PM PDT
@lennie - Do you pay for reading news.com or what's your problem???? Who cares!
by Tom Krazit June 4, 2009 4:15 PM PDT
Thanks for your diligent copy editing. We post our stories using a Firefox-optimized tool, which has a built-in spell-checker, but this is one I must have missed since it's in the caption not the story body.
by kojacked June 5, 2009 1:29 PM PDT
"I think it makes you a jerk."

+1

Applicable to all anal rententive subsequent posts. There are bigger problems in the world that need more attention.
by lazycat202 June 4, 2009 1:39 PM PDT
nice quote.
Reply to this comment
by tm_anon June 4, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
The point for home users is still valid, unless a parent becomes an armed guard for their childs searching, they can still find porn. That's true of any search engine.

Bing makes it easier for finding porn by not only giving the child the option to turn off the filtering but also by providing the link to the search filter change dialogue and then enabling playback of porn clips without ever going to the site.

Like I posted in another article, that's the cyber equivalent of "are you sure your parents aren't home?".

At least with the other search engines, you have to actively go search for the filter dialogue, turn it off, then repeat the search query.
Reply to this comment
by dhavleak June 4, 2009 3:28 PM PDT
FUD.

Do an image or video search on google and you get the exact same link at the top.

Text of the link is "Moderate SafeSearch is on" in google.

tm_anon -- are you so blinded by your MS hate that you will say just about anything negative that comes to your mind? Facts, etc. be damned??
by tm_anon June 4, 2009 6:34 PM PDT
@dhavleak

Just did a Google search for the same terms I checked Bing with, no extra link popping up from it.

The "Moderate SafeSearch is on" link is there no matter what terms you put in, nothing pops up as it does with Bing and it still navigates you away from the page in order to turn it on or off, just like it always has.

Maybe you're not getting it, Bing actually adds a new link specifically for you to turn off the filtering process. It's not a permalink like Google has, it's a specific pop-up style link that only appears when there's content "missing" from your search.

Maybe you're just too blinded from your anti-me campaign that you're not quite getting that MS did a very bad thing here. The basic search is fine, it's actually pretty fast. The problem comes in when MS puts the option to turn off the search filter directly on the page as a very obvious link that only appears when there is content missing and then they play the video direct from the search results, nothing shows in the browsers history because of that.

Get over yourself, I'm not spreading FUD, I'm telling the truth. Go check it.
by tm_anon June 4, 2009 10:40 PM PDT
Did a video search on Google, no pop ups came up telling me there was a filter in place, the only link available was the "Moderate SaveSearch is on" which was jumbled with the other links as it always is.

I had written a much longer, more involved response but CNet took it down, not sure why since it involved nothing but the truth.
by dhavleak June 7, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
More FUD

1. Safe search / filtering is the default for both Bing and Google.
2. It can be turned off for both Bing and Google.

Claiming anything else is simply FUD. If you stand by what you're saying - post the exact search term you're using and let us all see the difference.
by steamyJoint June 4, 2009 2:54 PM PDT
This is just another try by Microsoft to look cool, and they do try hard. This seems like just like a bunch of hype and graphics in an attempt to look cool to a world that has experienced countless MS based OS failures. Bing. Maybe they don't know it but most the marijuana using world knows what a Bing is.
Reply to this comment
by edentifier2 June 4, 2009 3:55 PM PDT
Ah yes, so many OS failures -yet Microsoft rules the OS market...

... and that must be true, as all the Linux and Apple people are still chanting the 'MS is an evil monopoly' mantra.

Well, living in Amsterdam (and that's in Europe by the way, for some of our readers), personally I don't really care what names people associate with either an MS search engine, or weed. Apparently, back in the olden days, to 'googlinge' meant the same as the modern day 'felching', in some Norse dialects. Now that could make an interesting icon-of-the-day on a certain website...
by Dalkorian June 5, 2009 10:01 AM PDT
Uh, Steamy, you misspelled "bong". You haven't smoked enough wacky tobacky, or you have smoked to much. The point is you haven't smoked just the right amount.
8-)
by shellcodes_coder June 4, 2009 6:59 PM PDT
Bing is good but still not better than Google when search for online books for students like myself
Reply to this comment
by SnowCrash8 June 5, 2009 5:52 AM PDT
I am now using Bing on a trial basis exclusively for my search needs. So far it seems to work acceptably. I like Bing?s video search feature too.

I will make a decision in a couple of weeks whether to stick with Bing, but so far I like it.

According to this blogged metric, Bing may have surpassed Yahoo Search, primarily by reducing the market leader's share: http://bit.ly/bCLLy
Reply to this comment
by fearghail June 5, 2009 7:10 AM PDT
If it's Microsoft it's not on my computer, Bills boys haven't done anything in the past decade that amounts to a hill of beans, why should Bing be any different, and where do they come up with the crappy names for their crappy products? Zune, XBox, XP, Longhorn, Vista, crap names all. Starting your new product out with a stupid name is a 2 steps back one forward mentality, handicaps a product before it gets off the ground.
Reply to this comment
by kojacked June 5, 2009 1:32 PM PDT
"Fear", yep that fits you.
by flickrz June 5, 2009 1:30 PM PDT
wasn't it the adult content that made google successful initially? I remember seeing numbers like 33% of all queries on google were adult content related in early days (99-03).
Reply to this comment
by tommyg562000 June 5, 2009 3:36 PM PDT
Why are all these reporters looking at porn? That's really the first thing they did when Bing went live? Maybe all you who are complaining about this need to get some help with your porn addiction!
Reply to this comment
(24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

Most Popular

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right