May 20, 2009 10:59 AM PDT

Facebook rolls out its revamped apps directory

by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

As anticipated from last week's Facebook company blog post, the company has rolled out a redesigned directory of applications that has been tweaked to better show off verified applications. The company has also trimmed the number of categories down to just seven from a list that had grown to 22.

Verified applications are those that have gone through Facebook's new annual verification program, which costs $375, or $175 for students. Facebook vets these apps to make sure they conform to the company's standards both in content and in API usage.

Apps that have been verified get a little green check mark next to their name, along with a large badge that goes on their description pages. With this move it also nets verified apps more exposure within the directory. They're now shown off in a new featured section that goes on top of all the other applications in each category.

While users can choose to only view verified apps in each category, one area where verified apps do not have as much importance is with Facebook's search. If you do a search for an app, it does not tell you whether it's been verified or not within the results, something that Facebook could change as an additional incentive for developers to pay up to get verified.

The new Facebook apps directory is a little more trimmed down, and highlights applications that have been verified with a little green check mark.

(Credit: CNET)
Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by PigSpigot May 20, 2009 1:30 PM PDT
What's weird to me about this is not that FB is basically blackmailing developers into paying them for "verification," but that this is part of their business model at all. Taxing content creators as opposed to consumers seems like a poor way to run a company.
-David
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn May 20, 2009 2:29 PM PDT
I don't know if I'd use "blackmail" here. It's not that they don't get to be in the directory if they don't pay up. If I were a developer I'd be a bit irked though; you're paying the company to do a policing job on the code and the content that it should be doing anyway. The promotional business in the directory should be another side of the business.
advertisement
Click Here

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right