Google offers better-tested Chrome version
Google released a new beta version of Chrome Tuesday, offering a better balance between software that's stable but out of date on the one hand and cutting-edge but crash-prone on the other.
The new version offers a number of new features, including zooming that increases or decreases the graphics as well as text; autofill to ease the chore of re-entering information in Web site forms; and new tab-dragging features that let you dock browser windows to the sides of the screen. The new beta version is essentially the same as Chrome 2.0.169.1 that was released last week to the Chrome developer preview channel for less-tested versions of the browser, Google said.
The feature Google chose to spotlight in a blog post announcing the new Chrome beta, though, is better JavaScript performance from a new version of the browser's V8 engine. "It's 25 percent faster on our V8 benchmark and 35 percent faster on the Sunspider benchmark than the current stable channel version and almost twice as fast when compared to our original beta version," Chrome product manager Brian Rakowski said in the blog post.
JavaScript is used to power elaborate Web applications such as Google Docs and refinements on countless more ordinary Web sites, and Google, Mozilla, Apple, and Opera all are racing to improve how well their browsers handle it.
Since releasing Chrome 1.0 in December, Google has essentially offered only two of the three promised versions of its browser: that stable version, which has received only minor tweaks, and the very rough-around-the-edges developer preview version where Google tries out new features. The beta version just tracked the stable version.
I've been using the developer preview version for the most part, despite the fact that several earlier incarnations were prone to becoming unresponsive and the latest one triggers an objection from Flickr's Organizr tool. Recent Chrome developer preview bug fixes have helped, but it's still not for most folks.
The better-tested beta, though, means many of the new features will be available to those with a lower tolerance for flakiness.
New how-to document for extensions
One big advantage
Firefox has over Chrome is its ability to accommodate extensions that endow the browser with new features. Google is working on the extensions for Chrome, though, and on Monday Google programmer Aaron Boodman published a how-to document for writing Chrome extensions.
"Right now extensions can only really contain content scripts, so that is all this doc covers. But we'll be expanding it over time as more features develop," Boodman said in an e-mail announcement of the how-to document.
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 



You can use it on OS other than Windows :/
Still waiting for the mac version... Ho hum...
I love the browser, not saying it's the best! as it has a way to go yet. But I find it a joy to use most of the time.
While Firefox has all the add on's and things but I don't really miss a thing, apart from Adblock plus.
Keep it up Google,
I've been using Chrome ever since it was first released as a beta, and although initially it was very crash-prone, I am very satisfied with using it. Once Chrome gets extensions I think Google will give Mozilla a run for their money.
P.S.
I still use and like Firefox at school via my USB (it gets around my school's proxy :D).
- by jpmccloud01 March 18, 2009 7:25 PM PDT
- here is my theory about chrome. It's a great browser to a point; granted I have the first release. It has some flaws like not always loading pages correctly or not giving me full control of my hotmail account or causing where things with in hotmail. Again their is the fact that it is fast and the gui is easy and comfortable to use which is why I'm using it as I type my comment on this cite and can't wait for the next version to release. One thing of note though is their are somethings that still seem to work better through IE7 which is why I have that browser as well as firefox and safari on my 6 yr old computer. If one gets messed up I have more choices
- Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)