March 10, 2009 2:55 PM PDT

Google stomps dozens of Chrome bugs

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 20 comments

Google released a new developer preview version of Chrome Friday that fixed more than 150 bugs--then another version Monday that fixed about a dozen more.

Chrome 2.0.169.0 is a version of the browser geared for people who want the latest builds and are willing to put up with bugs and crashes. It's also a preview of things to come in the more reliable "stable" and "beta" versions.

When using predecessors, I have been annoyed chiefly with long periods of unresponsiveness, but I can hardly complain given that they've been only developer preview versions. Perhaps, though, this spate of fixes indicates an effort to stabilize things a bit for a new beta version based on the 2.x code.

One hint that might be the case is in the removal of the user profiles feature, a technology that could let you browse the Web with different electronic personas but that caused problems on the Mac version of Chrome that's in the works.

"We have decided not to support the current profile implementation in Beta or Stable," said Chrome Program Manager Mark Larson in a note on the Chromium developer site. And Jonathan Conradt, engineering program manager, added in a blog post, "We want to take this feature back to the drawing board before releasing it."

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by goodspeed8701 March 10, 2009 3:26 PM PDT
chrome sux anyway
Reply to this comment
by streamline35 March 11, 2009 8:31 PM PDT
I don't use it at home because of its lack of features and such, but after using firefox, chrome, and opera on my msi wind for a couple weeks, chrome is the clear winner just in terms of speediness and screen real estate - both of which are top priority on a netbook
by mark_925 March 10, 2009 3:49 PM PDT
I had that same unresponsiveness problem when chrome was first released, but it went away with whatever version they released after about two weeks. I'm using the 'stable' version.
Reply to this comment
by eluv72 March 10, 2009 4:23 PM PDT
I tried chrome for about 3 weeks when it first came out. Then decided that it was a pile of steaming doo doo. I prefer just to use igoogle..red sox scores, cnet news, wired news, weather, gmail, facebook, thats all the feeds I need.....who wants to spend that much time looking through the web browser functions and tabs anyway? doesent matter what they fix...its still too much junk ******** on the pages...
Reply to this comment
by vamman March 10, 2009 4:43 PM PDT
Junk browser. Not adhering to standards, shame on Google!
Reply to this comment
by Shankland March 10, 2009 5:09 PM PDT
Which standards do you wish they'd comply with that they're not? Can you be specific?
by darthstupid March 10, 2009 7:24 PM PDT
Unless you are referring to standards Microsoft wrote for IE you are full of crap. Go look up your facts.

Chrome is WebKit which is the foundation for half a dozen different major browsers. It's ilk is second in popularity only to Firefox based browsers.
by Business1980 March 10, 2009 7:06 PM PDT
Of course Chrome doesn't suck, but im disappointed about the not too early update releases, they are taking too long to improve a version, which bothers me, Firefox is taking the right road to the closest to "perfection" via feedback (so to speak), but i like a simpler look like Chrome, however being late in the updates i dont know where to go, im using safari 4 too, but the new designs kinda "hybrid" loses its personality somehow, how well, choosing a browser when using a lot the internet (specially for work) it takes observation and known opinions.
Reply to this comment
by slzb March 10, 2009 7:06 PM PDT
Chrome uses way less memory than any of the other browsers and the rendering and script performance absolutely trumps them too. The user interface is clean and maximizes screen space.

Not adhering to standards? what standards would you be talking about? It's based on WebKit, which is the most standards-compliant browser code base there is.

As for unresponsiveness, I think the chrome's design (isolating each tab as a separate copy) definitely favors multiple core CPUs. If you are running an out of date machine this may be a problem.
Reply to this comment
by planetjeffy March 11, 2009 10:25 AM PDT
I added chrome to my mom's very slow notebook and it is very quick and uses much less proccesor / memory. Sometimes less is more - especially for cranky older machines.
by George_Marenco March 10, 2009 7:07 PM PDT
I like Firefox better.
Reply to this comment
by nopinktoday March 11, 2009 5:48 AM PDT
Yes sir, but this article is about "Google Chrome".
by NicholasTuck March 10, 2009 9:12 PM PDT
I would love to really give Chrome a chance to shine, however being a web developer just doesn't give me that option. Takes quite a bit of knowledge to figure out the different interpretations between firefox and IE, and don't have the time to waste to develop via Chrome. However a final test passing in firefox normally renders the same, or close enough in Chrome due to similar web kit implementation. However the debugging process and rendering differences for faulty code would be like starting from square one again, though the built in tools in Chrome are great and replace many firefox extentions, I just can't foresee a lot of developers risk time wasted for chrome interpreting a fault differently than their familiar firefox and IE.

Until Chrome is out for a while longer I am sticking to firefox just to keep sanity. Add a few numbers before and after that version dot though the chance of switching increases.
Reply to this comment
by exactlyy March 11, 2009 1:13 AM PDT
well.. i tried every single browser available, safari 4 is too hybrid, Chrome is too naked ,IE is too stupid and bugged,opera is fine i just cant get along with it, my choice is FF ,and whocares about memory leak, when u have 4 or 6 GB of RAM ,what if FF uses 100 mb or even 500 MB ?? and get ur browser to look and work the way u want!
Reply to this comment
by firtvid20 March 11, 2009 1:25 AM PDT
I use Chrome and I like it. It is fast.
Reply to this comment
by aaronbucks March 11, 2009 8:40 AM PDT
Chrome is a fantastic browser, easy to use.....its brought a new standard in speed and in the future reliability to web browsing. And for all you Chrome haters....I use all major web browsers and they all have hickups, crashes now and then, good/bad features. but most features are being adopted by all of them. so to one browser users, you need some diversity in your life and try new things.....last thing i have to say is..Chrome does need to fix there Sound....i have no sound on any web pages..just in chrome..chrome...thats one bug you might want to look into...thanks
Reply to this comment
by ProzacJM March 11, 2009 12:42 PM PDT
My big problem with chrome is doesn't work flawless with a lot of forums -doesn't show some buttons, you can't quote etc- love how fast it is.
Reply to this comment
by knowles2 March 11, 2009 4:49 PM PDT
I had that problem for sometime with chrome on various borders it disappeared a couple of days after it appeared, it was either a update to the browser or to the forums. Do not know but it was nothing I knowingly did through.
by March 11, 2009 2:35 PM PDT
I like browsers.
Reply to this comment
by AndrewRich March 11, 2009 10:02 PM PDT
Chrome is now my browser of choice on the sad occasions when I have to use Windows. My backups are Opera and Safari.
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right