• On GameFAQs: The top 10 strangest game bosses
December 17, 2008 8:15 AM PST

Yahoo idles Jumpcut, steers video users to Flickr

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments
Share
Jumpcut let people upload, combine, and share videos.

Jumpcut let people upload, combine, and share videos. Now it's in maintenance mode.

(Credit: Yahoo)

Yahoo's belt-tightening has led the company to shut down new uploads to its Jumpcut service for sharing and combining videos, steering people instead to its Flickr service.

"We're sorry to announce that we are no longer accepting uploads to Jumpcut," a note on the site said Wednesday. "It was a difficult decision that we wish we didn't have to make, but it was necessary in order to focus resources on other Yahoo sites."

Jumpcut now steers users to Yahoo's photo-sharing site Flickr, which got video abilities earlier this year. Jumpcut won't be shut down, and existing videos won't be deleted, but without the ability to upload new videos, it's clear the site doesn't have a shining future before it.

Yahoo acquired Jumpcut in 2006, but the service never made it out of beta testing.

Yahoo laid off 1,520 employees last week and is in the midst of a review of all its business units to see which should be preserved. The company is under fierce financial pressure that only got worse with the recession and increasingly gloomy forecasts for online advertising.

Jumpcut let people upload and share videos, but also combine them into larger works. This option is still available for existing videos, but people's remixed videos can't be downloaded.

"Jumpcut was built to assemble your movies in real-time so you wouldn't have to wait for rendering. The flip-side of this design means there's no single 'file to download,'" the site said. "There are third-party tools like http://www.clipnabber.com that you can use to get a partial download of your Jumpcut movies in .flv format, but the files created won't include any titles, transitions or effects that you added using the Jumpcut editor."

For video editing, the site steered people away from the cloud toward PC-based applications: Windows Movie Maker and Apple's iMovie.

(Via TechCrunch.)

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by sanenazok December 17, 2008 9:28 AM PST
How was Yahoo going to make any money from this EVER. I mean this has a pretty small market to begin with.
Reply to this comment
by skillingssucks December 17, 2008 4:13 PM PST
Yeah, I'm sure they get lots of takers by limiting videos to 90 seconds in length and 150MB in size. [rolls eyes]
Reply to this comment
by hiqutipie December 17, 2008 8:26 PM PST
It was actually one of the better ideas that yahoo had but like everything else yahoo has done in the past couple of years it gets dumped because of Stupidity...Lack of vision...Lets see... they let millions of photos go out of their great photo library instead of finding a way to incorporate the necessary features into it to combine it with flickr..
They had a great email app just developed that allowed you to send up to 300 photos at a time in email which was very amazing & easy to use...It got dumped because it was getting rid of the photo library...
Jumpcut was a great idea that worked...How many sites do you see where you can edit & post videos...
It just wasn't a finished product Again...It was too slow to upload but once there it worked fairly well.. But the concept was there...The developers are doing the job & coming up with the right ideas but management is failing them...You build it...They will come...Make it easy...make it fun...It will make you money on the social network...Yahoo only needs Vision...The tools are there...
Reply to this comment
by TedAvery December 17, 2008 9:23 PM PST
I didn't even know of this site till now. Unfortunate, it sounds like a pretty neat idea.
Reply to this comment
by terenceswee December 18, 2008 2:25 AM PST
Online user generated video is definitely a very challenging area to monetize. Most UGC that matters to you (home movies, personal memories) are just plain boring to others. (which also means limited eyeballs, no ad-revenue) Many of the ones that attract eyeballs are probably too risque for most advertisers.

Besides, home movies need editing to be even halfway watchable, but who has time for that?

We at muvee have been attacking this problem for over 8 years. We started www.shwup.com recently to allow users unlimited uploads of video and photos, collaborative remixing and keeping access absolutely personal. Only you and your invited guests can view and upload to the album. Invitees need not register to view, contribute or remix. We fund this by selling our PC sofware, which we develop and ship over 50MM copies of globally. It seems to be working. Wish us well! (and I hope you try it out!)

(Disclaimer: I am founder and CEO of muvee. I hope this does not count as advertisement, if it does, I apologize.)
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right