• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
August 26, 2008 3:33 PM PDT

Marvel forces Twitter takedown of fan account

by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 3 comments

If you've been thinking about starting a Twitter account under the pretense of being someone else you might want to think twice if it has anything to do with someone else's intellectual property.

In the past few weeks users, who have been trying their best to emulate characters from AMC's television series Mad Men have apparently had their accounts wiped clear and de-authorized by the microblogging start-up at the request of AMC's lawyers.

That's not the only instance, though.

More troubling is the story of Rich Johnston, a columnist for ComicBookResources.com. Johnston had gotten his hands on an advanced copy of a script for an upcoming graphic novel from publisher Marvel where Twitter was being used by one of the characters. Seeing the username unclaimed Johnston registered it, and began posting messages, essentially creating his own storyline.

Shortly thereafter, his comic-inspired Twitter account was wiped clear. In a response as to why it was no longer there, Johnston said he received a note from a Twitter representative telling him "I'd rather resolve this issue without getting Marvel's legal department involved because we are a very small start-up and lack a legal department."

For his troubles Johnston was given a Twitter T-shirt.

Going forward, the possible lack of a legal team at Twitter may be a more subtle problem than some of the service's growing pains that have affected a larger contingent of users. Say you've created an account using a brand name or posing as a public figure. Without proper protection for users, not only as part of the terms of service but also with people at Twitter willing to lay down the law, you're out of luck if a company decides to draft a takedown notice.

It's also not the first time Twitter's terms of service have gone under the microscope. Back in May, Ariel Waldman, Pownce.com's community manager, had trouble getting Twitter to take action on ongoing harassment. Waldman had jumped through nearly all the hoops usually needed for a company to take action, however, Twitter failed to even issue a warning to the harassing user despite a deluge of message history Waldman had presented.

While Johnston's early crack at the Twitter username might have been ill-willed, you can't fault the guy for thinking ahead--unlike Marvel. In the case of the Mad Men takedown, the real loser is AMC. If anything, the fake accounts were a source of fan enthusiasm that marketers would dream of achieving with cash-infused viral campaigns.

Note: Twitter did not respond to a request for comment on the Marvel matter.

Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by tikal2k August 26, 2008 4:17 PM PDT
That headline is awfully misleading.

Marvel didn't force anything, Twitter instead wisely avoided the entire fracas.
Reply to this comment
by weeklywishingwell August 27, 2008 3:02 AM PDT
Thats really strange since intellectual patient or identity i.e. copy write infringement is a new law to the net. I have been making fake myspace accounts for years with my friends, for people like Alex Trabec, Hitler, Bob Saget, and many others. We were never threatened with account closure. I guess Hollywood has started to ruin the last frontier of media. They did it with music and mp3, and now we cant even joke around online because they might deface or make fictional characters look bad? BIG AD MONEY "MAD MEN".... Just think if it was another show that was less popular would they expect this response? They would welcome it most likely provided it helped boost ratings and did not make them look bad.

As a loyal viewer of Mad Men since the first scene I must say you just lost me after reading this.

View more on this topic at www.weeklywishingwell.org Also win free gas through fuellinks.

Regards,
weeklywishingwell.org
Reply to this comment
by alex_mayorga August 27, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
No wonder they've started to crackdown on "Spidey" piņatas this side of the Rio Grande =P
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/Crackdown_on_licensed_items_could_wallop_pinata_makers.html
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right