• On GameFAQs: The top 10 strangest game bosses
August 6, 2008 11:25 AM PDT

Just what's so 'dynamic' about contrast ratio anyway?

by Eric Franklin

We test monitor contrast ratio in a secret, undisclosed location.

(Credit: Eric Franklin/CNET Networks)

Vendors want to sell you stuff! There, it's finally been said. Don't believe me? Well, you wouldn't be the first, but thankfully, I have evidence.

Within the last year I've seen a new spec, called dynamic contrast ratio (DCR), tossed around for computer displays. If you didn't know before, contrast ratio is simply the difference between the darkest blacks and the brightest whites a given display can produce.

Typically, computer displays have a contrast ratio of about 1000:1. However with DCR, you'll see numbers like 4000:1, 10,000:1, and higher. Basically, it's just a way for Company A to proclaim, "Don't buy Company B's monitor because it has a much lower DCR than our monitor." Since more and more vendors have been pushing this, I want to delve further into how they're getting these numbers. I also covered this topic in less detail (but with a sexy voice thrown in) in episode 2 of the Inside CNET Labs podcast.

Before a monitor is released to the public it goes through a bunch of testing in the vendor's own lab. These tests produce the specs that the vendor will then publish with the release. Specs like maximum brightness, pixel pitch, pixel response time, contrast ratio, and dynamic contrast ratio are all determined in the vendor's own lab.

When testing normal contrast ratio, vendors use a device that measures light to determine how much light is emanating from a display while it's showing both a completely black and a completely white screen. They then take each number, do a bit of math, and come up with the contrast ratio.

Now, aside from a relatively low number of LCDs that use newer LED backlighting technology, all LCDs have a lamp built in to their screens. When you turn your brightness setting down, you're actually just dimming the lamp in the back. When the vendors dim the backlight to get the contrast ratio score, they dim it to a point, but do not turn it off. When they test to get the readings for DCR, however, they turn on the DCR feature and put up a black screen. When the video signal is black or near black, this triggers the backlight to go into standby mode.

Once this is triggered, the darkness of the black level increases by a factor of 10 or more. At this point the vendor takes its reading for the dark screen and compares it with the white screen reading it got before. Since this new dark screen level is so dark, it increases the contrast ratio. The problem is that the screen only gets this dark when the video signal is black or near black--not very useful when you're watching a movie, or playing a game, or doing pretty much anything. The primary reason for including this feature is that the contrast ratio goes from 1000:1 to 10,000:1, and even 20,000:1 for computer displays and even higher for televisions.

When vendors push DCR as a spec for LCDs that use LED backlighting technology, however, it may be more appropriate. Direct contrast ratio works differently here than with lamp-based LCDs. When a portion of an image in a movie is relatively dark, the LEDs in that local area of the screen are dimmed. This occurs on a frame-by-frame basis and lowers the black level in that dark area only. Unfortunately, this implementation has its weaknesses, as well, as there can be some noticeable visual glitches in the areas that darken.

So, after the testing is done, the vendor publishes its super-high number, and Joe Consumer (not you, of course, loyal reader, but someone else) goes into the local Best Buy, looking to get a new monitor for his 5-year-old Compaq desktop that was handed down to him by his younger, more tech-savvy brother. He looks at the specs and sees that monitor A has a 10,000:1 DCR, while monitor B has a contrast ratio of 1000:1. Well, bigger numbers mean better, right? So, he goes for the display with DCR. And that's fine if A does everything else you want it to do.

If a display looks good with the type of content you plan to use on it, has the connections you want, is the right size and price, then by all means get it. Don't get it, however, just because of some spec that means jack when you're actually using the display (or has not been implemented well enough for the glitches not to distract, as is the case with LED-based DCR).

Originally posted at Inside CNET Labs Podcast
Eric Franklin refused to write a bio, saying, "Why are you bothering me about this bio business again? If I wanted people to know more about me, I'd send them to the Inside CNET Labs Podcast" (shameless plug). E-mail Eric.
Recent posts from Crave
Walkman versus the rest--Ask the Editors
The 411: Pre vs. iPhone, Limited Bluetooth, Amazon deals
Yamaha YHT-791BL: Big home theater sound from an all-in-one HTIB
Ghost Pigeon masks your supersecret identity
Make your own batteries (out of other batteries)
Samsung Omnia photo gallery
EzCube FM Transmitter: Super tiny, works great
Do new PS3 bundles mean Slim is coming soon?
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by Alan Sobel August 7, 2008 1:42 PM PDT
This "dynamic contrast ratio" scam is similar to the old techniques of quoting max luminance with the brightness control turned all the way up and the minimum with the device practically off. ANSI luminance and contrast values should obviate this nonsense.
IF the LED backlight arrangement uses multiple LEDs for different areas of the display and IF the software can take account of the image content, THEN the contrast can indeed be improved, but there is, of course, considerable additional cost involved.
Contrast in general is a function of the ambient light. If there's a lot of light impinging on the screen, the minimum luminance is increased and the contrast reduced. Somehow, vendors never talk about this. I have tried to introduce the term "intrinsic contrast" to describe the display contrast ratio in the total absence of ambient light, but this locution has never caught on.
Reply to this comment
by dewesh7665 September 24, 2008 9:47 AM PDT
wow..................u saved me.............thanks a lot....
with regards....
Reply to this comment
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Look before leaping to short URLs

Fueled by Twitter's rise, services that scrunch Web addresses are taking off. They bring a host of problems, but some are working to fix them.

In Utah desert, it's bombs away

road trip At the massive Utah Test & Training Range, the Air Force runs 15,000 sorties a year to ensure that pilots and weapons are on the mark.
• Photos: Training and testing

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right