• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
June 30, 2008 5:12 PM PDT

Viewsonic offers affordable 26-inch display

by Eric Franklin

Birds, flowers, and geometric shapes. Oh, my!

(Credit: Viewsonic)

Twnety-six-inch displays are not the most common size of monitor out there, but Viewsonic is doing their part in changing that. Today they announced the Viewsonic VA2626mw for a price of $530. This price makes it cheaper than Dell's 24-inch model, but still more expensive than some of the others we've reviewed. I mean you are getting two extra inches here, though...

You're also getting a DVI, VGA, and HDMI input for your video connection needs and two built-in 2.5-watt stereo speakers.

Viewsonic claims a native resolution of 1920x1200 and a dynamic contrast ratio of 6,000:1, which is a very high number. However there are reasons why you should not put too much stock into it. If I can get one in for testing, however, we'll see how close our contrast ratio test can come to that.

The display releases in July for $530.

Eric Franklin refused to write a bio, saying, "Why are you bothering me about this bio business again? If I wanted people to know more about me, I'd send them to the Inside CNET Labs Podcast" (shameless plug). E-mail Eric.
Recent posts from Crave
Poll: Why don't you have an iPod or MP3 player?
Oppo's affordabe high-end Blu-ray player is here
iPhone 3GS jailbreak, 'purplera1n,' hits Web
Apple patents point to haptics, fingerprints, RFID
Friday Poll: We the ppl--imagining a digital 1776
Gadgettes 144: The Childhood Nostalgia Episode
Duet D8 is no iPhone clone
Rocking out with stereo Bluetooth
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Scopip June 30, 2008 9:55 PM PDT
It would go perfect with the ASUS Ebox or MSI Wind PC's that are coming out. I would never leave my couch unless I had to use my printer in my computer room.
Reply to this comment
by The Noble Robot July 1, 2008 7:21 AM PDT
Uh, what's the resolution??? That is far more important than contrast ratio...

Man, who cares what size the physical screen size is if it's only 900 pixels tall??

I'd expect a screen that large to be 1900x1200-ish, but then again, the lack of a number is very suspicious and makes this post totally useless without outside research.

Thanks, Crave, once again giving us *almost* the whole story... :-(
Reply to this comment
by scythie July 1, 2008 7:45 AM PDT
Probably 1680x1050
by nwkurzrep July 2, 2008 1:34 PM PDT
Dude, you blind? Pull your foot out of your mouth before bashing...it specifically says 1920x1200 in the last paragraph.
by Spartanic July 5, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
Your right the resolution will be 1900x1200, in fact it was mentioned on the same sentence as the contrast ratio. Hard to miss.
by blabtech July 5, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
I believe I would purchase this monitor...

http://blabtech.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by dmarie50 July 5, 2008 10:37 AM PDT
I have a ViewSonic VX2255wm monitor that has a nice picture, but the sound leaves much to be desired. The volume is set to low and you cannot adjust it higher. I have my music on my pc and it is so disappointing not to be able to hear it any where else but right at the computer. A real disappointment. Make sure you try it out before you buy!
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right